The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military

C. McDonald, P. Newman, J. Witchalls

Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Injury in the military can be experienced in up to 25% of men and 50% of women. This poses a significant threat to a soldier's health and readiness for deployment, and accounts for significant expenditure of money and resources. The physical fitness of military personnel is regularly measured with aerobic running tests despite the fact that higher running distances in training increases the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching Cinahl, Scopus and Medline (via Web of Science) databases for primary research that analysed the relationship between injury incidence and physical fitness tests in any military population. Results: Twenty-two studies were included that assessed the relationship between physical fitness and injury in the military. All but one of these studies assessed the links between aerobic fitness testing and injury with running measures, 2 of which identified progressive running test formats and another 2 papers studied non-running aerobic fitness tests. The papers that analysed running tests (from 1.6 km to 3.2 km) found significant (p = 0.03–0.05) risk ratios for injury between 1.43 and 2.8 for those who were in the slowest quartile of run times. The progressive endurance runs showed significant (p = 0.000) risk ratios between 2.2 and 2.58 in poorly performing groups, while those who failed non-running aerobic tests were up to 1.31 times more likely to experience an injury (95% CI = 1.20–1.44). Discussion: Running tests are an estimate of maximal aerobic capacity and the results of this review suggest that low aerobic fitness, irrespective of the test type, is a risk factor for injury in the military. Running may have value for lower limb conditioning for military specificity, but the significance in terms of injury prevention appears to relate to improving aerobic fitness. If increasing aerobic fitness and decreasing soldiers’ running mileage reduces the risk of injury, then the current practice of high-load running training should be reconsidered. A more varied aerobic training program could be implemented to mitigate these risk factors. A future randomised control trial would be effective to test the benefits of non-running aerobic conditioning to meet the requirements for physical conditioning in the military, while reducing the risk of injury
Original languageEnglish
Pages60-60
Number of pages1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017
Event4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance - Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Duration: 28 Nov 20171 Dec 2017
https://www.icspp-australia2017.org/program-tuesday-28-november.php

Conference

Conference4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance
Abbreviated titleICSPP
CountryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period28/11/171/12/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Physical Fitness
Military Personnel
Odds Ratio
Health Expenditures
Exercise Test
Lower Extremity
Databases
Education
Incidence
Health
Research
Population

Cite this

McDonald, C., Newman, P., & Witchalls, J. (2017). The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military. 60-60. Abstract from 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance, Melbourne, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.160
McDonald, C. ; Newman, P. ; Witchalls, J. / The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military. Abstract from 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance, Melbourne, Australia.1 p.
@conference{76ecae071158453aba8a47a3999111d5,
title = "The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military",
abstract = "Introduction: Injury in the military can be experienced in up to 25{\%} of men and 50{\%} of women. This poses a significant threat to a soldier's health and readiness for deployment, and accounts for significant expenditure of money and resources. The physical fitness of military personnel is regularly measured with aerobic running tests despite the fact that higher running distances in training increases the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching Cinahl, Scopus and Medline (via Web of Science) databases for primary research that analysed the relationship between injury incidence and physical fitness tests in any military population. Results: Twenty-two studies were included that assessed the relationship between physical fitness and injury in the military. All but one of these studies assessed the links between aerobic fitness testing and injury with running measures, 2 of which identified progressive running test formats and another 2 papers studied non-running aerobic fitness tests. The papers that analysed running tests (from 1.6 km to 3.2 km) found significant (p = 0.03–0.05) risk ratios for injury between 1.43 and 2.8 for those who were in the slowest quartile of run times. The progressive endurance runs showed significant (p = 0.000) risk ratios between 2.2 and 2.58 in poorly performing groups, while those who failed non-running aerobic tests were up to 1.31 times more likely to experience an injury (95{\%} CI = 1.20–1.44). Discussion: Running tests are an estimate of maximal aerobic capacity and the results of this review suggest that low aerobic fitness, irrespective of the test type, is a risk factor for injury in the military. Running may have value for lower limb conditioning for military specificity, but the significance in terms of injury prevention appears to relate to improving aerobic fitness. If increasing aerobic fitness and decreasing soldiers’ running mileage reduces the risk of injury, then the current practice of high-load running training should be reconsidered. A more varied aerobic training program could be implemented to mitigate these risk factors. A future randomised control trial would be effective to test the benefits of non-running aerobic conditioning to meet the requirements for physical conditioning in the military, while reducing the risk of injury",
author = "C. McDonald and P. Newman and J. Witchalls",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.160",
language = "English",
pages = "60--60",
note = "4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance, ICSPP ; Conference date: 28-11-2017 Through 01-12-2017",
url = "https://www.icspp-australia2017.org/program-tuesday-28-november.php",

}

McDonald, C, Newman, P & Witchalls, J 2017, 'The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military' 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance, Melbourne, Australia, 28/11/17 - 1/12/17, pp. 60-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.160

The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military. / McDonald, C.; Newman, P.; Witchalls, J.

2017. 60-60 Abstract from 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance, Melbourne, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Abstract

TY - CONF

T1 - The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military

AU - McDonald, C.

AU - Newman, P.

AU - Witchalls, J.

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Introduction: Injury in the military can be experienced in up to 25% of men and 50% of women. This poses a significant threat to a soldier's health and readiness for deployment, and accounts for significant expenditure of money and resources. The physical fitness of military personnel is regularly measured with aerobic running tests despite the fact that higher running distances in training increases the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching Cinahl, Scopus and Medline (via Web of Science) databases for primary research that analysed the relationship between injury incidence and physical fitness tests in any military population. Results: Twenty-two studies were included that assessed the relationship between physical fitness and injury in the military. All but one of these studies assessed the links between aerobic fitness testing and injury with running measures, 2 of which identified progressive running test formats and another 2 papers studied non-running aerobic fitness tests. The papers that analysed running tests (from 1.6 km to 3.2 km) found significant (p = 0.03–0.05) risk ratios for injury between 1.43 and 2.8 for those who were in the slowest quartile of run times. The progressive endurance runs showed significant (p = 0.000) risk ratios between 2.2 and 2.58 in poorly performing groups, while those who failed non-running aerobic tests were up to 1.31 times more likely to experience an injury (95% CI = 1.20–1.44). Discussion: Running tests are an estimate of maximal aerobic capacity and the results of this review suggest that low aerobic fitness, irrespective of the test type, is a risk factor for injury in the military. Running may have value for lower limb conditioning for military specificity, but the significance in terms of injury prevention appears to relate to improving aerobic fitness. If increasing aerobic fitness and decreasing soldiers’ running mileage reduces the risk of injury, then the current practice of high-load running training should be reconsidered. A more varied aerobic training program could be implemented to mitigate these risk factors. A future randomised control trial would be effective to test the benefits of non-running aerobic conditioning to meet the requirements for physical conditioning in the military, while reducing the risk of injury

AB - Introduction: Injury in the military can be experienced in up to 25% of men and 50% of women. This poses a significant threat to a soldier's health and readiness for deployment, and accounts for significant expenditure of money and resources. The physical fitness of military personnel is regularly measured with aerobic running tests despite the fact that higher running distances in training increases the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching Cinahl, Scopus and Medline (via Web of Science) databases for primary research that analysed the relationship between injury incidence and physical fitness tests in any military population. Results: Twenty-two studies were included that assessed the relationship between physical fitness and injury in the military. All but one of these studies assessed the links between aerobic fitness testing and injury with running measures, 2 of which identified progressive running test formats and another 2 papers studied non-running aerobic fitness tests. The papers that analysed running tests (from 1.6 km to 3.2 km) found significant (p = 0.03–0.05) risk ratios for injury between 1.43 and 2.8 for those who were in the slowest quartile of run times. The progressive endurance runs showed significant (p = 0.000) risk ratios between 2.2 and 2.58 in poorly performing groups, while those who failed non-running aerobic tests were up to 1.31 times more likely to experience an injury (95% CI = 1.20–1.44). Discussion: Running tests are an estimate of maximal aerobic capacity and the results of this review suggest that low aerobic fitness, irrespective of the test type, is a risk factor for injury in the military. Running may have value for lower limb conditioning for military specificity, but the significance in terms of injury prevention appears to relate to improving aerobic fitness. If increasing aerobic fitness and decreasing soldiers’ running mileage reduces the risk of injury, then the current practice of high-load running training should be reconsidered. A more varied aerobic training program could be implemented to mitigate these risk factors. A future randomised control trial would be effective to test the benefits of non-running aerobic conditioning to meet the requirements for physical conditioning in the military, while reducing the risk of injury

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/relationship-between-low-aerobic-fitness-injury-military

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.160

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.160

M3 - Abstract

SP - 60

EP - 60

ER -

McDonald C, Newman P, Witchalls J. The relationship between low aerobic fitness and injury in the military. 2017. Abstract from 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance, Melbourne, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.160