The reliability and validity of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping

Rocco Cavaleri, Siobhan M Schabrun, Lucy S Chipchase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND: Traditional transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping involves systematically delivering stimuli over a predefined grid. The pseudorandom walk method seeks to improve map acquisition times by abandoning the grid in favour of delivering stimuli randomly over a given area.

OBJECTIVES: To i) determine the minimum interstimulus interval (ISI) required for reliable mapping outcomes within and between sessions using the pseudorandom walk method and ii) assess the validity of the pseudorandom walk method by testing its equivalence with traditional mapping.

METHODS: Maps collected using the pseudorandom walk method at four ISIs (4, 3, 2, and 1s) were compared to maps collected using traditional mapping in twenty healthy individuals. Outcomes included map area, volume, centre of gravity, mean MEP amplitude, and number of discrete peaks.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The pseudorandom walk method was valid and reliable with a 2-second ISI for all outcomes except number of discrete peaks, which was less reliable than other measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1291-1295
Number of pages5
JournalBrain Stimulation
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'The reliability and validity of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this