The renewal of quality assurance in Australian higher education: the challenge of balancing academic rigour, equity and quality outcomes

Mahsood Shah, IONE LEWIS, Robert FITZGERALD

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)
    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The renewal of quality in Australian higher education comes at a time of significant change in the external policy framework. Such changes are timely due to the growth of higher education and the emergence of the quality and equity agenda in the context of ongoing decline in public funding. The article provides an overview of current quality assurance arrangements and the outcome of the recent review of higher education. The dilemma faced by Australian universities in improving quality outcomes and maintaining high standards, while meeting the government's aspiration to increase the enrolment of students from targeted equity groups, is outlined. The article critiques past inequity in rewarding universities based on measures of student satisfaction, rather than using measures of access, participation and retention of students from diverse equity groups. The challenges facing universities in meeting the government's 2020 equity targets without compromising academic rigour, standards and quality outcomes are presented
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)265-278
    Number of pages14
    JournalQuality in Higher Education
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    quality assurance
    equity
    university
    education
    student
    Group
    funding
    participation

    Cite this

    @article{f0fe90ef830e4bf59a78c4486bffb95d,
    title = "The renewal of quality assurance in Australian higher education: the challenge of balancing academic rigour, equity and quality outcomes",
    abstract = "The renewal of quality in Australian higher education comes at a time of significant change in the external policy framework. Such changes are timely due to the growth of higher education and the emergence of the quality and equity agenda in the context of ongoing decline in public funding. The article provides an overview of current quality assurance arrangements and the outcome of the recent review of higher education. The dilemma faced by Australian universities in improving quality outcomes and maintaining high standards, while meeting the government's aspiration to increase the enrolment of students from targeted equity groups, is outlined. The article critiques past inequity in rewarding universities based on measures of student satisfaction, rather than using measures of access, participation and retention of students from diverse equity groups. The challenges facing universities in meeting the government's 2020 equity targets without compromising academic rigour, standards and quality outcomes are presented",
    keywords = "academic rigour, equity, quality outcomes, higher education, funding, student satisfaction, standards",
    author = "Mahsood Shah and IONE LEWIS and Robert FITZGERALD",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1080/13538322.2011.614474",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "265--278",
    journal = "Quality in Higher Education",
    issn = "1353-8322",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    The renewal of quality assurance in Australian higher education: the challenge of balancing academic rigour, equity and quality outcomes. / Shah, Mahsood; LEWIS, IONE; FITZGERALD, Robert.

    In: Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2011, p. 265-278.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The renewal of quality assurance in Australian higher education: the challenge of balancing academic rigour, equity and quality outcomes

    AU - Shah, Mahsood

    AU - LEWIS, IONE

    AU - FITZGERALD, Robert

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - The renewal of quality in Australian higher education comes at a time of significant change in the external policy framework. Such changes are timely due to the growth of higher education and the emergence of the quality and equity agenda in the context of ongoing decline in public funding. The article provides an overview of current quality assurance arrangements and the outcome of the recent review of higher education. The dilemma faced by Australian universities in improving quality outcomes and maintaining high standards, while meeting the government's aspiration to increase the enrolment of students from targeted equity groups, is outlined. The article critiques past inequity in rewarding universities based on measures of student satisfaction, rather than using measures of access, participation and retention of students from diverse equity groups. The challenges facing universities in meeting the government's 2020 equity targets without compromising academic rigour, standards and quality outcomes are presented

    AB - The renewal of quality in Australian higher education comes at a time of significant change in the external policy framework. Such changes are timely due to the growth of higher education and the emergence of the quality and equity agenda in the context of ongoing decline in public funding. The article provides an overview of current quality assurance arrangements and the outcome of the recent review of higher education. The dilemma faced by Australian universities in improving quality outcomes and maintaining high standards, while meeting the government's aspiration to increase the enrolment of students from targeted equity groups, is outlined. The article critiques past inequity in rewarding universities based on measures of student satisfaction, rather than using measures of access, participation and retention of students from diverse equity groups. The challenges facing universities in meeting the government's 2020 equity targets without compromising academic rigour, standards and quality outcomes are presented

    KW - academic rigour

    KW - equity

    KW - quality outcomes

    KW - higher education

    KW - funding

    KW - student satisfaction

    KW - standards

    U2 - 10.1080/13538322.2011.614474

    DO - 10.1080/13538322.2011.614474

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 265

    EP - 278

    JO - Quality in Higher Education

    JF - Quality in Higher Education

    SN - 1353-8322

    IS - 3

    ER -