The rise of defensive engineering: How personal liability considerations impact decision-making

Jan Hayes, Sarah MASLEN, Christina Scott-Young, Janice Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on a survey of Australian engineers (n = 275) this paper examines the impact of personal liability considerations on engineering decision-making. Almost all respondents who make high-stakes decisions saw questions of liability as having both positive (90%) and negative (87%) impacts. Our analysis shows that awareness of personal liability acts to focus the attention of many engineers on the moral dimension of their work. However, it also encourages more expensive decision-making, inhibition of innovation and professional paralysis. We argue that while personal legal liability is a legitimate way to focus engineers’ attention on the potential impact of their work, a problem arises when decision-makers are held responsible for disasters over which they had little control. The focus then shifts to ‘defensive engineering’ practices that are aimed at limiting individual liability rather than disaster prevention. Legal processes that are seen to unfairly allocate blame do not encourage practices that support future disaster prevention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1131-1145
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

liability
Disaster prevention
Decision making
engineering
decision making
Engineers
engineer
disaster
Disasters
Innovation
legal process
decision maker
Liability
innovation

Cite this

Hayes, Jan ; MASLEN, Sarah ; Scott-Young, Christina ; Wong, Janice. / The rise of defensive engineering: How personal liability considerations impact decision-making. In: Journal of Risk Research. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 1131-1145.
@article{772c0ead5f7e4420b5285c6ab481b719,
title = "The rise of defensive engineering: How personal liability considerations impact decision-making",
abstract = "Based on a survey of Australian engineers (n = 275) this paper examines the impact of personal liability considerations on engineering decision-making. Almost all respondents who make high-stakes decisions saw questions of liability as having both positive (90{\%}) and negative (87{\%}) impacts. Our analysis shows that awareness of personal liability acts to focus the attention of many engineers on the moral dimension of their work. However, it also encourages more expensive decision-making, inhibition of innovation and professional paralysis. We argue that while personal legal liability is a legitimate way to focus engineers’ attention on the potential impact of their work, a problem arises when decision-makers are held responsible for disasters over which they had little control. The focus then shifts to ‘defensive engineering’ practices that are aimed at limiting individual liability rather than disaster prevention. Legal processes that are seen to unfairly allocate blame do not encourage practices that support future disaster prevention.",
keywords = "accident investigation, blame, expertise, professional practice, Safety",
author = "Jan Hayes and Sarah MASLEN and Christina Scott-Young and Janice Wong",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2017.1391319",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1131--1145",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "9",

}

The rise of defensive engineering: How personal liability considerations impact decision-making. / Hayes, Jan; MASLEN, Sarah; Scott-Young, Christina; Wong, Janice.

In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2018, p. 1131-1145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rise of defensive engineering: How personal liability considerations impact decision-making

AU - Hayes, Jan

AU - MASLEN, Sarah

AU - Scott-Young, Christina

AU - Wong, Janice

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Based on a survey of Australian engineers (n = 275) this paper examines the impact of personal liability considerations on engineering decision-making. Almost all respondents who make high-stakes decisions saw questions of liability as having both positive (90%) and negative (87%) impacts. Our analysis shows that awareness of personal liability acts to focus the attention of many engineers on the moral dimension of their work. However, it also encourages more expensive decision-making, inhibition of innovation and professional paralysis. We argue that while personal legal liability is a legitimate way to focus engineers’ attention on the potential impact of their work, a problem arises when decision-makers are held responsible for disasters over which they had little control. The focus then shifts to ‘defensive engineering’ practices that are aimed at limiting individual liability rather than disaster prevention. Legal processes that are seen to unfairly allocate blame do not encourage practices that support future disaster prevention.

AB - Based on a survey of Australian engineers (n = 275) this paper examines the impact of personal liability considerations on engineering decision-making. Almost all respondents who make high-stakes decisions saw questions of liability as having both positive (90%) and negative (87%) impacts. Our analysis shows that awareness of personal liability acts to focus the attention of many engineers on the moral dimension of their work. However, it also encourages more expensive decision-making, inhibition of innovation and professional paralysis. We argue that while personal legal liability is a legitimate way to focus engineers’ attention on the potential impact of their work, a problem arises when decision-makers are held responsible for disasters over which they had little control. The focus then shifts to ‘defensive engineering’ practices that are aimed at limiting individual liability rather than disaster prevention. Legal processes that are seen to unfairly allocate blame do not encourage practices that support future disaster prevention.

KW - accident investigation

KW - blame

KW - expertise

KW - professional practice

KW - Safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032373728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/rise-defensive-engineering-personal-liability-considerations-impact-decisionmaking

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2017.1391319

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2017.1391319

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1131

EP - 1145

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 9

ER -