The Role of Culture, Workgroup Membership, and Organizational Status on Cooperation and Trust: An Experimental Investigation

Jennifer Loh, Joanne R. Smith, Simon Lloyd D. Restubog

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined how interactions among participants' cultural backgrounds (e.g., Australian vs. Singaporean) and multiple subgroups (e.g., cultural group membership, workgroup membership, organizational status) affect trust and cooperation in the workplace. University students (120 Australians, 120 Singaporeans) responded to hypothetical scenarios of cooperation and trust in the workplace. The results indicated that, for both Australians and Singaporeans, trust and cooperation were more strongly influenced by workgroup membership and organizational status than by cultural group membership. Participants trusted and cooperated more with work in-group members than with work out-group members, and trusted and cooperated more with superiors than with peers. Theoretical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2947-2968
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume40
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Workplace
Students

Cite this

@article{fcf340b334b74d8d8686dc5930c24c52,
title = "The Role of Culture, Workgroup Membership, and Organizational Status on Cooperation and Trust: An Experimental Investigation",
abstract = "We examined how interactions among participants' cultural backgrounds (e.g., Australian vs. Singaporean) and multiple subgroups (e.g., cultural group membership, workgroup membership, organizational status) affect trust and cooperation in the workplace. University students (120 Australians, 120 Singaporeans) responded to hypothetical scenarios of cooperation and trust in the workplace. The results indicated that, for both Australians and Singaporeans, trust and cooperation were more strongly influenced by workgroup membership and organizational status than by cultural group membership. Participants trusted and cooperated more with work in-group members than with work out-group members, and trusted and cooperated more with superiors than with peers. Theoretical implications are discussed.",
author = "Jennifer Loh and Smith, {Joanne R.} and Restubog, {Simon Lloyd D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00688.x",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "2947--2968",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

The Role of Culture, Workgroup Membership, and Organizational Status on Cooperation and Trust: An Experimental Investigation. / Loh, Jennifer; Smith, Joanne R.; Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 2947-2968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Culture, Workgroup Membership, and Organizational Status on Cooperation and Trust: An Experimental Investigation

AU - Loh, Jennifer

AU - Smith, Joanne R.

AU - Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - We examined how interactions among participants' cultural backgrounds (e.g., Australian vs. Singaporean) and multiple subgroups (e.g., cultural group membership, workgroup membership, organizational status) affect trust and cooperation in the workplace. University students (120 Australians, 120 Singaporeans) responded to hypothetical scenarios of cooperation and trust in the workplace. The results indicated that, for both Australians and Singaporeans, trust and cooperation were more strongly influenced by workgroup membership and organizational status than by cultural group membership. Participants trusted and cooperated more with work in-group members than with work out-group members, and trusted and cooperated more with superiors than with peers. Theoretical implications are discussed.

AB - We examined how interactions among participants' cultural backgrounds (e.g., Australian vs. Singaporean) and multiple subgroups (e.g., cultural group membership, workgroup membership, organizational status) affect trust and cooperation in the workplace. University students (120 Australians, 120 Singaporeans) responded to hypothetical scenarios of cooperation and trust in the workplace. The results indicated that, for both Australians and Singaporeans, trust and cooperation were more strongly influenced by workgroup membership and organizational status than by cultural group membership. Participants trusted and cooperated more with work in-group members than with work out-group members, and trusted and cooperated more with superiors than with peers. Theoretical implications are discussed.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00688.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00688.x

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 2947

EP - 2968

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 12

ER -