The role of identification in frontline employee decision-making

Rita Di Mascio, Johra FATIMA

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Literature claims that frontline employees (FLEs) who identify strongly with brands and organizations are more likely to make decisions that are aligned with the objectives of brand (Kimpakorn and Tocquer, 2009) and organization (Smidts et al., 2001). This claim is based on studies of general FLE identification and behaviors, and coheres with an implicit assumption in marketing literature that FLE identification levels are stable, with predictable behavioral outcomes. However, it is unknown whether the claim applies to specific instances of decisionmaking. This article is a first step toward testing that claim. A self-report survey was used that asked retail FLEs to think of a difficult situation they faced recently while serving a customer, and the factors they considered in resolving the situation; and then asked about general levels of brand- and organizational-identification. The stated likelihood of considering brand- and organization-factors was unrelated to general brand- and organizational- identification, but was related to service experience. This study suggests that: (a) FLE brand- and organizational- identification should be viewed as less stable (or more labile) than currently assumed in marketing literature, and that general levels of identification may not transfer to some specific situations of decisionmaking; (b) employees can distinguish between organization and brand identities; and (c) researchers studying retail FLE identification using survey methods should incorporate robustness checks to deal with lability of identification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-138
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Volume43
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Decision making
Frontline employees
Brand identification
Organizational identification
Retail
Factors
Marketing
Testing
Brand identity
Employees
Self-report
Robustness
Service experience

Cite this

@article{bdd79533e9624c899d447d0a6c1a85b4,
title = "The role of identification in frontline employee decision-making",
abstract = "Literature claims that frontline employees (FLEs) who identify strongly with brands and organizations are more likely to make decisions that are aligned with the objectives of brand (Kimpakorn and Tocquer, 2009) and organization (Smidts et al., 2001). This claim is based on studies of general FLE identification and behaviors, and coheres with an implicit assumption in marketing literature that FLE identification levels are stable, with predictable behavioral outcomes. However, it is unknown whether the claim applies to specific instances of decisionmaking. This article is a first step toward testing that claim. A self-report survey was used that asked retail FLEs to think of a difficult situation they faced recently while serving a customer, and the factors they considered in resolving the situation; and then asked about general levels of brand- and organizational-identification. The stated likelihood of considering brand- and organization-factors was unrelated to general brand- and organizational- identification, but was related to service experience. This study suggests that: (a) FLE brand- and organizational- identification should be viewed as less stable (or more labile) than currently assumed in marketing literature, and that general levels of identification may not transfer to some specific situations of decisionmaking; (b) employees can distinguish between organization and brand identities; and (c) researchers studying retail FLE identification using survey methods should incorporate robustness checks to deal with lability of identification.",
keywords = "Organization identification, Brand identification, Retail frontline employee, Decision-making, Cognitive load",
author = "{Di Mascio}, Rita and Johra FATIMA",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.008",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "131--138",
journal = "Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services",
issn = "0969-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

The role of identification in frontline employee decision-making. / Di Mascio, Rita; FATIMA, Johra.

In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 43, 07.2018, p. 131-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of identification in frontline employee decision-making

AU - Di Mascio, Rita

AU - FATIMA, Johra

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Literature claims that frontline employees (FLEs) who identify strongly with brands and organizations are more likely to make decisions that are aligned with the objectives of brand (Kimpakorn and Tocquer, 2009) and organization (Smidts et al., 2001). This claim is based on studies of general FLE identification and behaviors, and coheres with an implicit assumption in marketing literature that FLE identification levels are stable, with predictable behavioral outcomes. However, it is unknown whether the claim applies to specific instances of decisionmaking. This article is a first step toward testing that claim. A self-report survey was used that asked retail FLEs to think of a difficult situation they faced recently while serving a customer, and the factors they considered in resolving the situation; and then asked about general levels of brand- and organizational-identification. The stated likelihood of considering brand- and organization-factors was unrelated to general brand- and organizational- identification, but was related to service experience. This study suggests that: (a) FLE brand- and organizational- identification should be viewed as less stable (or more labile) than currently assumed in marketing literature, and that general levels of identification may not transfer to some specific situations of decisionmaking; (b) employees can distinguish between organization and brand identities; and (c) researchers studying retail FLE identification using survey methods should incorporate robustness checks to deal with lability of identification.

AB - Literature claims that frontline employees (FLEs) who identify strongly with brands and organizations are more likely to make decisions that are aligned with the objectives of brand (Kimpakorn and Tocquer, 2009) and organization (Smidts et al., 2001). This claim is based on studies of general FLE identification and behaviors, and coheres with an implicit assumption in marketing literature that FLE identification levels are stable, with predictable behavioral outcomes. However, it is unknown whether the claim applies to specific instances of decisionmaking. This article is a first step toward testing that claim. A self-report survey was used that asked retail FLEs to think of a difficult situation they faced recently while serving a customer, and the factors they considered in resolving the situation; and then asked about general levels of brand- and organizational-identification. The stated likelihood of considering brand- and organization-factors was unrelated to general brand- and organizational- identification, but was related to service experience. This study suggests that: (a) FLE brand- and organizational- identification should be viewed as less stable (or more labile) than currently assumed in marketing literature, and that general levels of identification may not transfer to some specific situations of decisionmaking; (b) employees can distinguish between organization and brand identities; and (c) researchers studying retail FLE identification using survey methods should incorporate robustness checks to deal with lability of identification.

KW - Organization identification

KW - Brand identification

KW - Retail frontline employee

KW - Decision-making

KW - Cognitive load

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044483264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/role-identification-frontline-employee-decisionmaking

U2 - 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 131

EP - 138

JO - Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

JF - Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

SN - 0969-6989

ER -