The role of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as science-policy interface

Thomas Koetz, Peter Bridgewater, Sybille van den Hove, Bernd Siebenhüner

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has become the centre of heated debates concerning its function as the science-policy interface of the Convention. Based on explorations of the role, nature, and organisation of scientific advice mechanisms for multilateral environmental agreements in general, we give reasons for SBSTTA's inherently political role in the current governance process of the CBD, and then explore ways to enhance SBSTTA's effectiveness as a science-policy interface, going beyond the usual view that it should merely be "more scientific". As the quality of SBSTTA's work depends primarily on the processes that guide the discussions during its meetings and on the material on which these discussions are based, we suggest that SBSTTA (a) improves its scientific foundation by systematically strengthening its relations to more scientific institutions outside the formal CBD regime, and (b) focuses on providing for a more substantive political debate to resolve alternative policy choices during its meetings. For this approach to succeed there is a need for a mechanism that provides SBSTTA with timely, salient, legitimate, and credible advice-a role that an International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB) could well provide.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)505-516
    Number of pages12
    JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
    Volume11
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2008

    Fingerprint

    science policy
    scientific institution
    biodiversity
    expertise
    regime
    governance
    convention
    policy
    science
    advice

    Cite this

    Koetz, Thomas ; Bridgewater, Peter ; van den Hove, Sybille ; Siebenhüner, Bernd. / The role of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as science-policy interface. In: Environmental Science and Policy. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 505-516.
    @article{afe2a08335ec4478b69a0605d325e827,
    title = "The role of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as science-policy interface",
    abstract = "The Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has become the centre of heated debates concerning its function as the science-policy interface of the Convention. Based on explorations of the role, nature, and organisation of scientific advice mechanisms for multilateral environmental agreements in general, we give reasons for SBSTTA's inherently political role in the current governance process of the CBD, and then explore ways to enhance SBSTTA's effectiveness as a science-policy interface, going beyond the usual view that it should merely be {"}more scientific{"}. As the quality of SBSTTA's work depends primarily on the processes that guide the discussions during its meetings and on the material on which these discussions are based, we suggest that SBSTTA (a) improves its scientific foundation by systematically strengthening its relations to more scientific institutions outside the formal CBD regime, and (b) focuses on providing for a more substantive political debate to resolve alternative policy choices during its meetings. For this approach to succeed there is a need for a mechanism that provides SBSTTA with timely, salient, legitimate, and credible advice-a role that an International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB) could well provide.",
    keywords = "Biodiversity governance, Convention on Biological Diversity, IMoSEB, SBSTTA, Science-policy interface, Scientific advice",
    author = "Thomas Koetz and Peter Bridgewater and {van den Hove}, Sybille and Bernd Siebenh{\"u}ner",
    year = "2008",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2008.05.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "505--516",
    journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
    issn = "1462-9011",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",
    number = "6",

    }

    The role of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as science-policy interface. / Koetz, Thomas; Bridgewater, Peter; van den Hove, Sybille; Siebenhüner, Bernd.

    In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.10.2008, p. 505-516.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The role of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as science-policy interface

    AU - Koetz, Thomas

    AU - Bridgewater, Peter

    AU - van den Hove, Sybille

    AU - Siebenhüner, Bernd

    PY - 2008/10/1

    Y1 - 2008/10/1

    N2 - The Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has become the centre of heated debates concerning its function as the science-policy interface of the Convention. Based on explorations of the role, nature, and organisation of scientific advice mechanisms for multilateral environmental agreements in general, we give reasons for SBSTTA's inherently political role in the current governance process of the CBD, and then explore ways to enhance SBSTTA's effectiveness as a science-policy interface, going beyond the usual view that it should merely be "more scientific". As the quality of SBSTTA's work depends primarily on the processes that guide the discussions during its meetings and on the material on which these discussions are based, we suggest that SBSTTA (a) improves its scientific foundation by systematically strengthening its relations to more scientific institutions outside the formal CBD regime, and (b) focuses on providing for a more substantive political debate to resolve alternative policy choices during its meetings. For this approach to succeed there is a need for a mechanism that provides SBSTTA with timely, salient, legitimate, and credible advice-a role that an International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB) could well provide.

    AB - The Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has become the centre of heated debates concerning its function as the science-policy interface of the Convention. Based on explorations of the role, nature, and organisation of scientific advice mechanisms for multilateral environmental agreements in general, we give reasons for SBSTTA's inherently political role in the current governance process of the CBD, and then explore ways to enhance SBSTTA's effectiveness as a science-policy interface, going beyond the usual view that it should merely be "more scientific". As the quality of SBSTTA's work depends primarily on the processes that guide the discussions during its meetings and on the material on which these discussions are based, we suggest that SBSTTA (a) improves its scientific foundation by systematically strengthening its relations to more scientific institutions outside the formal CBD regime, and (b) focuses on providing for a more substantive political debate to resolve alternative policy choices during its meetings. For this approach to succeed there is a need for a mechanism that provides SBSTTA with timely, salient, legitimate, and credible advice-a role that an International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB) could well provide.

    KW - Biodiversity governance

    KW - Convention on Biological Diversity

    KW - IMoSEB

    KW - SBSTTA

    KW - Science-policy interface

    KW - Scientific advice

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48749085149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.05.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.05.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 505

    EP - 516

    JO - Environmental Science and Policy

    JF - Environmental Science and Policy

    SN - 1462-9011

    IS - 6

    ER -