The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education

Matthew Ricketson

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

Abstract

Much of the debate about educating young journalists in Australia lurches between impassioned advocacy for practical experience over theory or vice versa. Both groups of advocates are worshipping the false god of dichotomy. It is more fruitful for the news media industry and the academy to acknowledge their respective strengths and limitations and to work accordingly. Journalism schools cannot replicate a newsroom and newsrooms provide precious little time for the kind of reading, thinking and debating that is essential for the development of reflective practitioners. The benefits of reading, thinking and debating are not as immediately apparent as mastering the inverted pyramid but, like slow-release fertiliser, their value is appreciated over time
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRefereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005
Place of PublicationAustralia
PublisherSchool of Arts, Griffith University
Pages1-8
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)1920952551
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes
EventJournalism Education Association Conference - Surfers Paradise, Australia
Duration: 29 Nov 20052 Dec 2005

Conference

ConferenceJournalism Education Association Conference
CountryAustralia
CitySurfers Paradise
Period29/11/052/12/05

Fingerprint

Debating
Education
Journalism
News Media
Practical Experience
Journalists
Dichotomy
Media Industry
Advocacy
Deity
Reflective

Cite this

Ricketson, M. (2005). The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education. In Refereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005 (pp. 1-8). Australia: School of Arts, Griffith University.
Ricketson, Matthew. / The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education. Refereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005. Australia : School of Arts, Griffith University, 2005. pp. 1-8
@inproceedings{d16e76227a89491e94cc641fba1aa40f,
title = "The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education",
abstract = "Much of the debate about educating young journalists in Australia lurches between impassioned advocacy for practical experience over theory or vice versa. Both groups of advocates are worshipping the false god of dichotomy. It is more fruitful for the news media industry and the academy to acknowledge their respective strengths and limitations and to work accordingly. Journalism schools cannot replicate a newsroom and newsrooms provide precious little time for the kind of reading, thinking and debating that is essential for the development of reflective practitioners. The benefits of reading, thinking and debating are not as immediately apparent as mastering the inverted pyramid but, like slow-release fertiliser, their value is appreciated over time",
author = "Matthew Ricketson",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "1920952551",
pages = "1--8",
booktitle = "Refereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005",
publisher = "School of Arts, Griffith University",

}

Ricketson, M 2005, The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education. in Refereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005. School of Arts, Griffith University, Australia, pp. 1-8, Journalism Education Association Conference, Surfers Paradise, Australia, 29/11/05.

The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education. / Ricketson, Matthew.

Refereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005. Australia : School of Arts, Griffith University, 2005. p. 1-8.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education

AU - Ricketson, Matthew

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Much of the debate about educating young journalists in Australia lurches between impassioned advocacy for practical experience over theory or vice versa. Both groups of advocates are worshipping the false god of dichotomy. It is more fruitful for the news media industry and the academy to acknowledge their respective strengths and limitations and to work accordingly. Journalism schools cannot replicate a newsroom and newsrooms provide precious little time for the kind of reading, thinking and debating that is essential for the development of reflective practitioners. The benefits of reading, thinking and debating are not as immediately apparent as mastering the inverted pyramid but, like slow-release fertiliser, their value is appreciated over time

AB - Much of the debate about educating young journalists in Australia lurches between impassioned advocacy for practical experience over theory or vice versa. Both groups of advocates are worshipping the false god of dichotomy. It is more fruitful for the news media industry and the academy to acknowledge their respective strengths and limitations and to work accordingly. Journalism schools cannot replicate a newsroom and newsrooms provide precious little time for the kind of reading, thinking and debating that is essential for the development of reflective practitioners. The benefits of reading, thinking and debating are not as immediately apparent as mastering the inverted pyramid but, like slow-release fertiliser, their value is appreciated over time

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1920952551

SP - 1

EP - 8

BT - Refereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005

PB - School of Arts, Griffith University

CY - Australia

ER -

Ricketson M. The slow-release fertiliser theory of journalism education. In Refereed paper presented to the Journalism Education Conference, Griffith University, 29 November ¿ 2 December 2005. Australia: School of Arts, Griffith University. 2005. p. 1-8