The 'smaller' the school, the better? The Smaller Learning Communities (SLC) program in US high schools

Moosung Lee, Tom Friedrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the widening achievement gap between whites and students of color in US schools, Small Learning Communities have emerged as a reform measure claimed to boost achievement in general and among racial minorities. This article examines this claim by reviewing the major policy documents and literature on SLC and analyzing SLC using Frank's (1972) policy assessment criteria. The SLC program was found to be theoretically grounded in social capital theory, to be feasible politically and financially given strong federal and private foundations' support, and to have strong ethical merit given its aims of raising achievement, closing the racial achievement gap and personalizing learning. Analysis of multiple standardized data sets on 193 SLC schools showed that despite modest achievement gains, the racial gap was found to still be wide, although SLC schools located in large cities where students of color predominated made consistent gains, and Hispanic students showed significant yearly gains. Implications for research and policy are reviewed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-282
Number of pages22
JournalImproving Schools
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

school
learning
community
assessment criteria
student
large city
social capital
minority
reform

Cite this

@article{5f807c3c03d44d5ea7fa90e0678ffc03,
title = "The 'smaller' the school, the better? The Smaller Learning Communities (SLC) program in US high schools",
abstract = "Given the widening achievement gap between whites and students of color in US schools, Small Learning Communities have emerged as a reform measure claimed to boost achievement in general and among racial minorities. This article examines this claim by reviewing the major policy documents and literature on SLC and analyzing SLC using Frank's (1972) policy assessment criteria. The SLC program was found to be theoretically grounded in social capital theory, to be feasible politically and financially given strong federal and private foundations' support, and to have strong ethical merit given its aims of raising achievement, closing the racial achievement gap and personalizing learning. Analysis of multiple standardized data sets on 193 SLC schools showed that despite modest achievement gains, the racial gap was found to still be wide, although SLC schools located in large cities where students of color predominated made consistent gains, and Hispanic students showed significant yearly gains. Implications for research and policy are reviewed.",
keywords = "Achievement gap, Empirical validity, Ethical merit, Policy feasibility, Smaller learning communities program, Theoretical adequacy",
author = "Moosung Lee and Tom Friedrich",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1365480207078217",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "261--282",
journal = "Improving Schools Improving Schools",
issn = "1365-4802",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

The 'smaller' the school, the better? The Smaller Learning Communities (SLC) program in US high schools. / Lee, Moosung; Friedrich, Tom.

In: Improving Schools, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.11.2007, p. 261-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 'smaller' the school, the better? The Smaller Learning Communities (SLC) program in US high schools

AU - Lee, Moosung

AU - Friedrich, Tom

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Given the widening achievement gap between whites and students of color in US schools, Small Learning Communities have emerged as a reform measure claimed to boost achievement in general and among racial minorities. This article examines this claim by reviewing the major policy documents and literature on SLC and analyzing SLC using Frank's (1972) policy assessment criteria. The SLC program was found to be theoretically grounded in social capital theory, to be feasible politically and financially given strong federal and private foundations' support, and to have strong ethical merit given its aims of raising achievement, closing the racial achievement gap and personalizing learning. Analysis of multiple standardized data sets on 193 SLC schools showed that despite modest achievement gains, the racial gap was found to still be wide, although SLC schools located in large cities where students of color predominated made consistent gains, and Hispanic students showed significant yearly gains. Implications for research and policy are reviewed.

AB - Given the widening achievement gap between whites and students of color in US schools, Small Learning Communities have emerged as a reform measure claimed to boost achievement in general and among racial minorities. This article examines this claim by reviewing the major policy documents and literature on SLC and analyzing SLC using Frank's (1972) policy assessment criteria. The SLC program was found to be theoretically grounded in social capital theory, to be feasible politically and financially given strong federal and private foundations' support, and to have strong ethical merit given its aims of raising achievement, closing the racial achievement gap and personalizing learning. Analysis of multiple standardized data sets on 193 SLC schools showed that despite modest achievement gains, the racial gap was found to still be wide, although SLC schools located in large cities where students of color predominated made consistent gains, and Hispanic students showed significant yearly gains. Implications for research and policy are reviewed.

KW - Achievement gap

KW - Empirical validity

KW - Ethical merit

KW - Policy feasibility

KW - Smaller learning communities program

KW - Theoretical adequacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35848940012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1365480207078217

DO - 10.1177/1365480207078217

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 261

EP - 282

JO - Improving Schools Improving Schools

JF - Improving Schools Improving Schools

SN - 1365-4802

IS - 3

ER -