The spatial thinking workbook

A research-validated spatial skills curriculum for geology majors

Carol J. Ormand, Thomas F. Shipley, Basil Tikoff, Barbara Dutrow, Laurel B. Goodwin, Thomas Hickson, Kinnari Atit, Kristin Gagnier, Ilyse Resnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial visualization is an essential prerequisite for understanding geological features at all scales, such as the atomic structures of minerals, the geometry of a complex fault system, or the architecture of sedimentary deposits. Undergraduate geoscience majors bring a range of spatial skill levels to upper-level courses. Fortunately, spatial thinking improves with practice, and students benefit from intentional training. Several promising teaching strategies have emerged from recent cognitive science research into spatial thinking: gesturing, predictive sketching, and comparison, including analogy and alignment. Geoscience educators have traditionally incorporated many of these tools in their teaching, though not always consciously, intentionally, and in the most effective ways. Our research team, composed of geoscientists and cognitive psychologists, has collaborated to develop curricular materials for mineralogy, structural geology, and sedimentology and stratigraphy courses that incorporate these strategies intentionally and purposefully, supporting student understanding of the spatially challenging concepts and skills in these courses. Collectively, these two dozen learning activities comprise the Spatial Thinking Workbook (http://serc.carleton.edu/spatialworkbook/index.html). Pre- to posttest gains on a suite of assessment instruments, as well as embedded assessments, show that these curricular materials boost students’ spatial thinking skills and strengthen their ability to solve geological problems with a spatial component.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-434
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Geoscience Education
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

curriculum
student
geology
teaching
structural geology
geological feature
sedimentology
visualization
mineralogy
stratigraphy
teaching strategy
learning
psychologist
geometry
mathematics
mineral
educator
ability
Teaching
science

Cite this

Ormand, Carol J. ; Shipley, Thomas F. ; Tikoff, Basil ; Dutrow, Barbara ; Goodwin, Laurel B. ; Hickson, Thomas ; Atit, Kinnari ; Gagnier, Kristin ; Resnick, Ilyse. / The spatial thinking workbook : A research-validated spatial skills curriculum for geology majors. In: Journal of Geoscience Education. 2017 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 423-434.
@article{378aefe8aa6b4a82a79a1ee71ff6ccd0,
title = "The spatial thinking workbook: A research-validated spatial skills curriculum for geology majors",
abstract = "Spatial visualization is an essential prerequisite for understanding geological features at all scales, such as the atomic structures of minerals, the geometry of a complex fault system, or the architecture of sedimentary deposits. Undergraduate geoscience majors bring a range of spatial skill levels to upper-level courses. Fortunately, spatial thinking improves with practice, and students benefit from intentional training. Several promising teaching strategies have emerged from recent cognitive science research into spatial thinking: gesturing, predictive sketching, and comparison, including analogy and alignment. Geoscience educators have traditionally incorporated many of these tools in their teaching, though not always consciously, intentionally, and in the most effective ways. Our research team, composed of geoscientists and cognitive psychologists, has collaborated to develop curricular materials for mineralogy, structural geology, and sedimentology and stratigraphy courses that incorporate these strategies intentionally and purposefully, supporting student understanding of the spatially challenging concepts and skills in these courses. Collectively, these two dozen learning activities comprise the Spatial Thinking Workbook (http://serc.carleton.edu/spatialworkbook/index.html). Pre- to posttest gains on a suite of assessment instruments, as well as embedded assessments, show that these curricular materials boost students’ spatial thinking skills and strengthen their ability to solve geological problems with a spatial component.",
keywords = "Analogy, Gesture, Progressive alignment, Sketching, Spatial thinking",
author = "Ormand, {Carol J.} and Shipley, {Thomas F.} and Basil Tikoff and Barbara Dutrow and Goodwin, {Laurel B.} and Thomas Hickson and Kinnari Atit and Kristin Gagnier and Ilyse Resnick",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5408/16-210.1",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "423--434",
journal = "Journal of Geological Education",
issn = "0022-1368",
publisher = "National Association of Geoscience Teachers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Ormand, CJ, Shipley, TF, Tikoff, B, Dutrow, B, Goodwin, LB, Hickson, T, Atit, K, Gagnier, K & Resnick, I 2017, 'The spatial thinking workbook: A research-validated spatial skills curriculum for geology majors', Journal of Geoscience Education, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 423-434. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-210.1

The spatial thinking workbook : A research-validated spatial skills curriculum for geology majors. / Ormand, Carol J.; Shipley, Thomas F.; Tikoff, Basil; Dutrow, Barbara; Goodwin, Laurel B.; Hickson, Thomas; Atit, Kinnari; Gagnier, Kristin; Resnick, Ilyse.

In: Journal of Geoscience Education, Vol. 65, No. 4, 01.11.2017, p. 423-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The spatial thinking workbook

T2 - A research-validated spatial skills curriculum for geology majors

AU - Ormand, Carol J.

AU - Shipley, Thomas F.

AU - Tikoff, Basil

AU - Dutrow, Barbara

AU - Goodwin, Laurel B.

AU - Hickson, Thomas

AU - Atit, Kinnari

AU - Gagnier, Kristin

AU - Resnick, Ilyse

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Spatial visualization is an essential prerequisite for understanding geological features at all scales, such as the atomic structures of minerals, the geometry of a complex fault system, or the architecture of sedimentary deposits. Undergraduate geoscience majors bring a range of spatial skill levels to upper-level courses. Fortunately, spatial thinking improves with practice, and students benefit from intentional training. Several promising teaching strategies have emerged from recent cognitive science research into spatial thinking: gesturing, predictive sketching, and comparison, including analogy and alignment. Geoscience educators have traditionally incorporated many of these tools in their teaching, though not always consciously, intentionally, and in the most effective ways. Our research team, composed of geoscientists and cognitive psychologists, has collaborated to develop curricular materials for mineralogy, structural geology, and sedimentology and stratigraphy courses that incorporate these strategies intentionally and purposefully, supporting student understanding of the spatially challenging concepts and skills in these courses. Collectively, these two dozen learning activities comprise the Spatial Thinking Workbook (http://serc.carleton.edu/spatialworkbook/index.html). Pre- to posttest gains on a suite of assessment instruments, as well as embedded assessments, show that these curricular materials boost students’ spatial thinking skills and strengthen their ability to solve geological problems with a spatial component.

AB - Spatial visualization is an essential prerequisite for understanding geological features at all scales, such as the atomic structures of minerals, the geometry of a complex fault system, or the architecture of sedimentary deposits. Undergraduate geoscience majors bring a range of spatial skill levels to upper-level courses. Fortunately, spatial thinking improves with practice, and students benefit from intentional training. Several promising teaching strategies have emerged from recent cognitive science research into spatial thinking: gesturing, predictive sketching, and comparison, including analogy and alignment. Geoscience educators have traditionally incorporated many of these tools in their teaching, though not always consciously, intentionally, and in the most effective ways. Our research team, composed of geoscientists and cognitive psychologists, has collaborated to develop curricular materials for mineralogy, structural geology, and sedimentology and stratigraphy courses that incorporate these strategies intentionally and purposefully, supporting student understanding of the spatially challenging concepts and skills in these courses. Collectively, these two dozen learning activities comprise the Spatial Thinking Workbook (http://serc.carleton.edu/spatialworkbook/index.html). Pre- to posttest gains on a suite of assessment instruments, as well as embedded assessments, show that these curricular materials boost students’ spatial thinking skills and strengthen their ability to solve geological problems with a spatial component.

KW - Analogy

KW - Gesture

KW - Progressive alignment

KW - Sketching

KW - Spatial thinking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035042066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5408/16-210.1

DO - 10.5408/16-210.1

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 423

EP - 434

JO - Journal of Geological Education

JF - Journal of Geological Education

SN - 0022-1368

IS - 4

ER -