TY - JOUR
T1 - The spatial thinking workbook
T2 - A research-validated spatial skills curriculum for geology majors
AU - Ormand, Carol J.
AU - Shipley, Thomas F.
AU - Tikoff, Basil
AU - Dutrow, Barbara
AU - Goodwin, Laurel B.
AU - Hickson, Thomas
AU - Atit, Kinnari
AU - Gagnier, Kristin
AU - Resnick, Ilyse
N1 - Funding Information:
Knowing that spatial skills are essential for success, underdeveloped in many undergraduate geoscience majors, and malleable, and being aware of the cognitive science research supporting the teaching strategies described above, we obtained funding from the National Science Foundation to develop curricular materials designed to improve students’ spatial thinking skills. These materials focus on helping students understand challenging spatial concepts and master challenging spatial skills in three courses common in undergraduate geology curricula: Mineralogy, Structural Geology, and Sedimentology & Stratigraphy. We designed these curricular materials to help students in these courses develop both their domain-general spatial thinking skills (i.e., skills such as mental rotation) and their domain-specific spatial thinking skills (i.e., the ability to solve geological problems that require mental rotation, such as deducing the paleocurrent direction from cross-bed sets that have been rotated by folding or faulting). Our data show these materials to be effective at improving both domain-general and domain-specific spatial skills.
Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation’s Division of Undergraduate Education under grant numbers DUE-1044245, SBE-0541957, and SBE-1041707. We are grateful to the Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center for supporting the development of the Geologic Block Cross-Sectioning Test and the Crystal Slicing Test. We are also indebted to all students who agreed to participate in this study and to the teaching assistants who helped us to implement and assess the Spatial Thinking Workbook exercises.
Publisher Copyright:
© Nat. Assoc. Geosci. Teachers.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1/31
Y1 - 2018/1/31
N2 - Spatial visualization is an essential prerequisite for understanding geological features at all scales, such as the atomic structures of minerals, the geometry of a complex fault system, or the architecture of sedimentary deposits. Undergraduate geoscience majors bring a range of spatial skill levels to upper-level courses. Fortunately, spatial thinking improves with practice, and students benefit from intentional training. Several promising teaching strategies have emerged from recent cognitive science research into spatial thinking: gesturing, predictive sketching, and comparison, including analogy and alignment. Geoscience educators have traditionally incorporated many of these tools in their teaching, though not always consciously, intentionally, and in the most effective ways. Our research team, composed of geoscientists and cognitive psychologists, has collaborated to develop curricular materials for mineralogy, structural geology, and sedimentology and stratigraphy courses that incorporate these strategies intentionally and purposefully, supporting student understanding of the spatially challenging concepts and skills in these courses. Collectively, these two dozen learning activities comprise the Spatial Thinking Workbook (http://serc.carleton.edu/spatialworkbook/index.html). Pre- to posttest gains on a suite of assessment instruments, as well as embedded assessments, show that these curricular materials boost students’ spatial thinking skills and strengthen their ability to solve geological problems with a spatial component.
AB - Spatial visualization is an essential prerequisite for understanding geological features at all scales, such as the atomic structures of minerals, the geometry of a complex fault system, or the architecture of sedimentary deposits. Undergraduate geoscience majors bring a range of spatial skill levels to upper-level courses. Fortunately, spatial thinking improves with practice, and students benefit from intentional training. Several promising teaching strategies have emerged from recent cognitive science research into spatial thinking: gesturing, predictive sketching, and comparison, including analogy and alignment. Geoscience educators have traditionally incorporated many of these tools in their teaching, though not always consciously, intentionally, and in the most effective ways. Our research team, composed of geoscientists and cognitive psychologists, has collaborated to develop curricular materials for mineralogy, structural geology, and sedimentology and stratigraphy courses that incorporate these strategies intentionally and purposefully, supporting student understanding of the spatially challenging concepts and skills in these courses. Collectively, these two dozen learning activities comprise the Spatial Thinking Workbook (http://serc.carleton.edu/spatialworkbook/index.html). Pre- to posttest gains on a suite of assessment instruments, as well as embedded assessments, show that these curricular materials boost students’ spatial thinking skills and strengthen their ability to solve geological problems with a spatial component.
KW - Analogy
KW - Gesture
KW - Progressive alignment
KW - Sketching
KW - Spatial thinking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035042066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5408/16-210.1
DO - 10.5408/16-210.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85035042066
SN - 1089-9995
VL - 65
SP - 423
EP - 434
JO - Journal of Geoscience Education
JF - Journal of Geoscience Education
IS - 4
ER -