The Taliban Didn’t Create the Taliban, Imperialism Did

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sir Karl Popper’s (2002) method of historicism has been neglected in the analysis of the radicalisation of Afghanistan’s society in the form of the Taliban. Popper’s historicism is the idea that the past may allow the forecasting of the future by understanding the state of the present in one specific line of historical inquiry. It is argued herein that by analysing periods of imperialism—those eras of social injustice, violence and oppression—it is seen that such imperialism led to radical fundamentalism, as many had no choice but to lash out. The push to strenuous religious identity, heavily laden with violent tactics, was the natural response of peoples trying to maintain their identities and collective destiny from imperial domination. Furthermore, as evidence continues to show, most often those individuals that are first to radicalise are the poorest of the poor, the dispossessed, or those who have experienced violent injustices. Using Popper’s method, it is possible to explain how imperialism breeds radicalism (using Afghanistan as an example) and as such provide some general recommendations to swing the pendulum in reverse so as to minimise radical behaviour. This article has implications for international relations, foreign policies and aid.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-42
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of South Asian Development
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Taliban
    imperialism
    Afghanistan
    Foreign Policy, International Relations
    radicalization
    international relations
    radicalism
    foreign policy
    violence
    tactics
    aid
    present
    evidence
    method
    Imperialism
    Society
    society
    recommendation
    Foreign Policy
    Radicalization

    Cite this

    @article{990a039ff6b044b8a6d44c39b7d92c1b,
    title = "The Taliban Didn’t Create the Taliban, Imperialism Did",
    abstract = "Sir Karl Popper’s (2002) method of historicism has been neglected in the analysis of the radicalisation of Afghanistan’s society in the form of the Taliban. Popper’s historicism is the idea that the past may allow the forecasting of the future by understanding the state of the present in one specific line of historical inquiry. It is argued herein that by analysing periods of imperialism—those eras of social injustice, violence and oppression—it is seen that such imperialism led to radical fundamentalism, as many had no choice but to lash out. The push to strenuous religious identity, heavily laden with violent tactics, was the natural response of peoples trying to maintain their identities and collective destiny from imperial domination. Furthermore, as evidence continues to show, most often those individuals that are first to radicalise are the poorest of the poor, the dispossessed, or those who have experienced violent injustices. Using Popper’s method, it is possible to explain how imperialism breeds radicalism (using Afghanistan as an example) and as such provide some general recommendations to swing the pendulum in reverse so as to minimise radical behaviour. This article has implications for international relations, foreign policies and aid.",
    keywords = "Taliban, Afghanistan, Popper, historicism, imperialism, foreign policy, democracy, international relations.",
    author = "Jean-Paul GAGNON",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1177/097317411200700102",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "23--42",
    journal = "Journal of South Asian Development",
    issn = "0973-1733",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications India",
    number = "1",

    }

    The Taliban Didn’t Create the Taliban, Imperialism Did. / GAGNON, Jean-Paul.

    In: Journal of South Asian Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2012, p. 23-42.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Taliban Didn’t Create the Taliban, Imperialism Did

    AU - GAGNON, Jean-Paul

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Sir Karl Popper’s (2002) method of historicism has been neglected in the analysis of the radicalisation of Afghanistan’s society in the form of the Taliban. Popper’s historicism is the idea that the past may allow the forecasting of the future by understanding the state of the present in one specific line of historical inquiry. It is argued herein that by analysing periods of imperialism—those eras of social injustice, violence and oppression—it is seen that such imperialism led to radical fundamentalism, as many had no choice but to lash out. The push to strenuous religious identity, heavily laden with violent tactics, was the natural response of peoples trying to maintain their identities and collective destiny from imperial domination. Furthermore, as evidence continues to show, most often those individuals that are first to radicalise are the poorest of the poor, the dispossessed, or those who have experienced violent injustices. Using Popper’s method, it is possible to explain how imperialism breeds radicalism (using Afghanistan as an example) and as such provide some general recommendations to swing the pendulum in reverse so as to minimise radical behaviour. This article has implications for international relations, foreign policies and aid.

    AB - Sir Karl Popper’s (2002) method of historicism has been neglected in the analysis of the radicalisation of Afghanistan’s society in the form of the Taliban. Popper’s historicism is the idea that the past may allow the forecasting of the future by understanding the state of the present in one specific line of historical inquiry. It is argued herein that by analysing periods of imperialism—those eras of social injustice, violence and oppression—it is seen that such imperialism led to radical fundamentalism, as many had no choice but to lash out. The push to strenuous religious identity, heavily laden with violent tactics, was the natural response of peoples trying to maintain their identities and collective destiny from imperial domination. Furthermore, as evidence continues to show, most often those individuals that are first to radicalise are the poorest of the poor, the dispossessed, or those who have experienced violent injustices. Using Popper’s method, it is possible to explain how imperialism breeds radicalism (using Afghanistan as an example) and as such provide some general recommendations to swing the pendulum in reverse so as to minimise radical behaviour. This article has implications for international relations, foreign policies and aid.

    KW - Taliban

    KW - Afghanistan

    KW - Popper

    KW - historicism

    KW - imperialism

    KW - foreign policy

    KW - democracy

    KW - international relations.

    U2 - 10.1177/097317411200700102

    DO - 10.1177/097317411200700102

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 23

    EP - 42

    JO - Journal of South Asian Development

    JF - Journal of South Asian Development

    SN - 0973-1733

    IS - 1

    ER -