The tyranny of difference

Exploring attitudes to the role of the consumer academic in teaching students of mental health nursing

Brenda Happell, Julia Bocking, Brett Scholz, Chris Platania-Phung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Consumer participation in mental health service delivery is now a policy expectation. Negative attitudes of health professionals towards collaboration with consumers have been identified as a major barrier to policy implementation. Consumers contributing to the education of nurses and other health positions have been identified as an effective strategy, particularly when consumers occupy academic positions. Attitudes of nurse and consumer academics to the consumer academic role remain under-researched. Aims: To explore the implementation of a consumer academic position from the perspectives of the broader academic team. Methods: Qualitative exploratory research was undertaken to give voice to different perspectives of the implementation of a consumer academic position. In-depth interviews were conducted with nurse academics, the consumer academic and the research team. Results: Thematic data analysis revealed five main themes: seeking a united perspective; who can provide a consumer perspective? How accurate is consumer perspective? One consumer, one opinion, one way, one delivery; bias and poor portrayal of nurses. Conclusions: Marked divergence in views and opinions was evident in terms of support for the role and its perceived value. Further investigation of factors facilitating successful implementation is required and strategies identified to facilitate mutual understandings and goal setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Mental Health
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Psychiatric Nursing
Teaching
Nurses
Students
Attitude to Health
Qualitative Research
Mental Health Services
Interviews
Education
Health
Research

Cite this

@article{357f51e8d9b846ea9d1597be2dbbb75c,
title = "The tyranny of difference: Exploring attitudes to the role of the consumer academic in teaching students of mental health nursing",
abstract = "Background: Consumer participation in mental health service delivery is now a policy expectation. Negative attitudes of health professionals towards collaboration with consumers have been identified as a major barrier to policy implementation. Consumers contributing to the education of nurses and other health positions have been identified as an effective strategy, particularly when consumers occupy academic positions. Attitudes of nurse and consumer academics to the consumer academic role remain under-researched. Aims: To explore the implementation of a consumer academic position from the perspectives of the broader academic team. Methods: Qualitative exploratory research was undertaken to give voice to different perspectives of the implementation of a consumer academic position. In-depth interviews were conducted with nurse academics, the consumer academic and the research team. Results: Thematic data analysis revealed five main themes: seeking a united perspective; who can provide a consumer perspective? How accurate is consumer perspective? One consumer, one opinion, one way, one delivery; bias and poor portrayal of nurses. Conclusions: Marked divergence in views and opinions was evident in terms of support for the role and its perceived value. Further investigation of factors facilitating successful implementation is required and strategies identified to facilitate mutual understandings and goal setting.",
keywords = "Consumer academic, consumer participation, education of health professionals, mental health, mental health nursing, professional defensiveness, stigma",
author = "Brenda Happell and Julia Bocking and Brett Scholz and Chris Platania-Phung",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1080/09638237.2019.1581344",
language = "English",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health",
issn = "0963-8237",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

The tyranny of difference : Exploring attitudes to the role of the consumer academic in teaching students of mental health nursing. / Happell, Brenda; Bocking, Julia; Scholz, Brett; Platania-Phung, Chris.

In: Journal of Mental Health, 11.07.2019, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The tyranny of difference

T2 - Exploring attitudes to the role of the consumer academic in teaching students of mental health nursing

AU - Happell, Brenda

AU - Bocking, Julia

AU - Scholz, Brett

AU - Platania-Phung, Chris

PY - 2019/7/11

Y1 - 2019/7/11

N2 - Background: Consumer participation in mental health service delivery is now a policy expectation. Negative attitudes of health professionals towards collaboration with consumers have been identified as a major barrier to policy implementation. Consumers contributing to the education of nurses and other health positions have been identified as an effective strategy, particularly when consumers occupy academic positions. Attitudes of nurse and consumer academics to the consumer academic role remain under-researched. Aims: To explore the implementation of a consumer academic position from the perspectives of the broader academic team. Methods: Qualitative exploratory research was undertaken to give voice to different perspectives of the implementation of a consumer academic position. In-depth interviews were conducted with nurse academics, the consumer academic and the research team. Results: Thematic data analysis revealed five main themes: seeking a united perspective; who can provide a consumer perspective? How accurate is consumer perspective? One consumer, one opinion, one way, one delivery; bias and poor portrayal of nurses. Conclusions: Marked divergence in views and opinions was evident in terms of support for the role and its perceived value. Further investigation of factors facilitating successful implementation is required and strategies identified to facilitate mutual understandings and goal setting.

AB - Background: Consumer participation in mental health service delivery is now a policy expectation. Negative attitudes of health professionals towards collaboration with consumers have been identified as a major barrier to policy implementation. Consumers contributing to the education of nurses and other health positions have been identified as an effective strategy, particularly when consumers occupy academic positions. Attitudes of nurse and consumer academics to the consumer academic role remain under-researched. Aims: To explore the implementation of a consumer academic position from the perspectives of the broader academic team. Methods: Qualitative exploratory research was undertaken to give voice to different perspectives of the implementation of a consumer academic position. In-depth interviews were conducted with nurse academics, the consumer academic and the research team. Results: Thematic data analysis revealed five main themes: seeking a united perspective; who can provide a consumer perspective? How accurate is consumer perspective? One consumer, one opinion, one way, one delivery; bias and poor portrayal of nurses. Conclusions: Marked divergence in views and opinions was evident in terms of support for the role and its perceived value. Further investigation of factors facilitating successful implementation is required and strategies identified to facilitate mutual understandings and goal setting.

KW - Consumer academic

KW - consumer participation

KW - education of health professionals

KW - mental health

KW - mental health nursing

KW - professional defensiveness

KW - stigma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068764889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581344

DO - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581344

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Journal of Mental Health

JF - Journal of Mental Health

SN - 0963-8237

ER -