The unintended consequences of campaigns designed to challenge stigmatising representations of mental illness in the media

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The media is widely recognised as contributing to stigma associated with mental illness by portraying it in connection with violence and/or undesirable traits. In response, campaigns directed at policing language use, imagery and story content in the media have been implemented. But these interventions can themselves perpetuate stereotypes and assumptions that ultimately run counter to the original intent of challenging stigma. By way of illustration this paper analyses an Australian campaign that I argue invites people to see stigma in innocuous uses of ordinary language and imagery, effectively associating mental illness with that which it seeks to challenge. The grounds for its criticism and praise of stories about mental illness are also often tenuous and based on a limited approach to determining the impact of story content. The pitfalls of this type of campaign can be avoided by taking heed of the shifts in thinking advocated by postpsychiatry and the deconstructionist strategies employed by activists in the mental health field
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-236
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Semiotics
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

mental illness
campaign
Health
language
stereotype
criticism
mental health
violence
Violence
Mental Illness
Stigma
Imagery
Pitfalls
Ordinary Language
Criticism
Deconstructionist
Mental Health
Stereotypes
Language Use
Activists

Cite this

@article{b421b0e2058a45b2b993d0c212b4fc16,
title = "The unintended consequences of campaigns designed to challenge stigmatising representations of mental illness in the media",
abstract = "The media is widely recognised as contributing to stigma associated with mental illness by portraying it in connection with violence and/or undesirable traits. In response, campaigns directed at policing language use, imagery and story content in the media have been implemented. But these interventions can themselves perpetuate stereotypes and assumptions that ultimately run counter to the original intent of challenging stigma. By way of illustration this paper analyses an Australian campaign that I argue invites people to see stigma in innocuous uses of ordinary language and imagery, effectively associating mental illness with that which it seeks to challenge. The grounds for its criticism and praise of stories about mental illness are also often tenuous and based on a limited approach to determining the impact of story content. The pitfalls of this type of campaign can be avoided by taking heed of the shifts in thinking advocated by postpsychiatry and the deconstructionist strategies employed by activists in the mental health field",
keywords = "media, stigma, mental illness",
author = "Kate Holland",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/10350330.2011.648398",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "217--236",
journal = "Social Semiotics",
issn = "1035-0330",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unintended consequences of campaigns designed to challenge stigmatising representations of mental illness in the media

AU - Holland, Kate

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The media is widely recognised as contributing to stigma associated with mental illness by portraying it in connection with violence and/or undesirable traits. In response, campaigns directed at policing language use, imagery and story content in the media have been implemented. But these interventions can themselves perpetuate stereotypes and assumptions that ultimately run counter to the original intent of challenging stigma. By way of illustration this paper analyses an Australian campaign that I argue invites people to see stigma in innocuous uses of ordinary language and imagery, effectively associating mental illness with that which it seeks to challenge. The grounds for its criticism and praise of stories about mental illness are also often tenuous and based on a limited approach to determining the impact of story content. The pitfalls of this type of campaign can be avoided by taking heed of the shifts in thinking advocated by postpsychiatry and the deconstructionist strategies employed by activists in the mental health field

AB - The media is widely recognised as contributing to stigma associated with mental illness by portraying it in connection with violence and/or undesirable traits. In response, campaigns directed at policing language use, imagery and story content in the media have been implemented. But these interventions can themselves perpetuate stereotypes and assumptions that ultimately run counter to the original intent of challenging stigma. By way of illustration this paper analyses an Australian campaign that I argue invites people to see stigma in innocuous uses of ordinary language and imagery, effectively associating mental illness with that which it seeks to challenge. The grounds for its criticism and praise of stories about mental illness are also often tenuous and based on a limited approach to determining the impact of story content. The pitfalls of this type of campaign can be avoided by taking heed of the shifts in thinking advocated by postpsychiatry and the deconstructionist strategies employed by activists in the mental health field

KW - media

KW - stigma

KW - mental illness

U2 - 10.1080/10350330.2011.648398

DO - 10.1080/10350330.2011.648398

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 217

EP - 236

JO - Social Semiotics

JF - Social Semiotics

SN - 1035-0330

IS - 3

ER -