TY - JOUR
T1 - The Use of Sideline Video Review to Facilitate Management Decisions Following Head Trauma in Super Rugby (vol 4, 20, 2018)
AU - Gardner, Andrew J.
AU - Kohler, Ryan
AU - McDonald, Warren
AU - Fuller, Gordon W.
AU - Tucker, Ross
AU - Makdissi, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - In the original article [1] reference was made to the Hawk-Eye system having been used as the sideline operating system during the 2015 season. This reference was inaccurate; the data included in this study came from either commercial or non-commercial video systems used at the matches played during the 2015 season. The Hawk-Eye system is mentioned on two occasions in the article: 1) The Procedures section (p2, column 2) states: “The Hawk-Eye system (Hawk-Eye SMART productions) was used for matches in the current study; however, this was not available at any of the matches played in South Africa during the 2015 season.” This sentence should read: “Either commercial or non-commercial video systems were used for matches in the current study; however, these were not available at any of the matches played in South Africa during the 2015 season.” 2) The Analyses section (p3, column 1) states: “Thirdly, the effectiveness of sideline video review for identifying HIEs was evaluated by comparing the number of additional HIEs detected on retrospective post-season review between matches with and without the Hawk-Eye system available.” This sentence should read: “Thirdly, the effectiveness of sideline video review for identifying HIEs was evaluated by comparing the number of additional HIEs detected on retrospective post-season review between matches with and without the sideline video system available.”
AB - In the original article [1] reference was made to the Hawk-Eye system having been used as the sideline operating system during the 2015 season. This reference was inaccurate; the data included in this study came from either commercial or non-commercial video systems used at the matches played during the 2015 season. The Hawk-Eye system is mentioned on two occasions in the article: 1) The Procedures section (p2, column 2) states: “The Hawk-Eye system (Hawk-Eye SMART productions) was used for matches in the current study; however, this was not available at any of the matches played in South Africa during the 2015 season.” This sentence should read: “Either commercial or non-commercial video systems were used for matches in the current study; however, these were not available at any of the matches played in South Africa during the 2015 season.” 2) The Analyses section (p3, column 1) states: “Thirdly, the effectiveness of sideline video review for identifying HIEs was evaluated by comparing the number of additional HIEs detected on retrospective post-season review between matches with and without the Hawk-Eye system available.” This sentence should read: “Thirdly, the effectiveness of sideline video review for identifying HIEs was evaluated by comparing the number of additional HIEs detected on retrospective post-season review between matches with and without the sideline video system available.”
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075512782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40798-018-0133-4
DO - 10.1186/s40798-018-0133-4
M3 - Article
SN - 2199-1170
VL - 4
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Sports Medicine - Open
JF - Sports Medicine - Open
IS - 1
M1 - 54
ER -