TY - JOUR
T1 - The utility of dust for forensic intelligence
T2 - Exploring collection methods and detection limits for environmental DNA, elemental and mineralogical analyses of dust samples
AU - Foster, Nicole R.
AU - Martin, Belinda
AU - Hoogewerff, Jurian
AU - Aberle, Michael G.
AU - de Caritat, Patrice
AU - Roffey, Paul
AU - Edwards, Robert
AU - Malik, Arif
AU - Thwaites, Priscilla
AU - Waycott, Michelle
AU - Young, Jennifer
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the funding and support provided by the Defence Innovation Partnership through a collaborative research fund awarded to Dr. Jennifer Young [ InFoDust Project ] and an Australian Postgraduate Research Internship awarded to Belinda Martin in collaboration with Defence Science and Technology Group . Patrice de Caritat publishes with the permission of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Environmental DNA (eDNA), elemental and mineralogical analyses of soil have been shown to be specific to their source material, prompting consideration of using the airborne fraction of soil (dust) for forensic intelligence work. Dust is ubiquitous in the environment and is easily transferred to items belonging to a person of interest, making dust analysis an ideal tool in forensic casework. The advent of Massive Parallel Sequencing technologies means metabarcoding of eDNA can uncover bacterial, fungal, and even plant genetic fingerprints in dust particles. Combining this with elemental and mineralogical compositions offers multiple, complementary lines of evidence for tracing the origin of an unknown dust sample. This is particularly pertinent when recovering dust from a person of interest to ascertain where they may have travelled. Prior to proposing dust as a forensic trace material, however, the optimum sampling protocols and detection limits need to be established to place parameters around its utility in this context. We tested several approaches to collecting dust from different materials and determined the lowest quantity of dust that could be analysed for eDNA, elemental composition and mineralogy, whilst still yielding results capable of distinguishing between sites. We found that fungal eDNA profiles could be obtained from multiple sample types and that tape lifts were the optimum collection method for discriminating between sites. We successfully recovered both fungal and bacterial eDNA profiles down to 3 mg of dust (the lowest tested quantity) and recovered elemental and mineralogical compositions for all tested sample quantities. We show that dust can be reliably recovered from different sample types, using different sampling techniques, and that fungi and bacteria, as well as elemental and mineralogical profiles, can be generated from small sample quantities, highlighting the utility of dust for forensic intelligence.
AB - Environmental DNA (eDNA), elemental and mineralogical analyses of soil have been shown to be specific to their source material, prompting consideration of using the airborne fraction of soil (dust) for forensic intelligence work. Dust is ubiquitous in the environment and is easily transferred to items belonging to a person of interest, making dust analysis an ideal tool in forensic casework. The advent of Massive Parallel Sequencing technologies means metabarcoding of eDNA can uncover bacterial, fungal, and even plant genetic fingerprints in dust particles. Combining this with elemental and mineralogical compositions offers multiple, complementary lines of evidence for tracing the origin of an unknown dust sample. This is particularly pertinent when recovering dust from a person of interest to ascertain where they may have travelled. Prior to proposing dust as a forensic trace material, however, the optimum sampling protocols and detection limits need to be established to place parameters around its utility in this context. We tested several approaches to collecting dust from different materials and determined the lowest quantity of dust that could be analysed for eDNA, elemental composition and mineralogy, whilst still yielding results capable of distinguishing between sites. We found that fungal eDNA profiles could be obtained from multiple sample types and that tape lifts were the optimum collection method for discriminating between sites. We successfully recovered both fungal and bacterial eDNA profiles down to 3 mg of dust (the lowest tested quantity) and recovered elemental and mineralogical compositions for all tested sample quantities. We show that dust can be reliably recovered from different sample types, using different sampling techniques, and that fungi and bacteria, as well as elemental and mineralogical profiles, can be generated from small sample quantities, highlighting the utility of dust for forensic intelligence.
KW - Bacteria
KW - DNA
KW - Fungi
KW - Metabarcoding
KW - Provenance
KW - Trace evidence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148038997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111599
DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111599
M3 - Article
C2 - 36801501
AN - SCOPUS:85148038997
SN - 0379-0738
VL - 344
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Forensic Science International
JF - Forensic Science International
M1 - 111599
ER -