Thematic analysis of youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services

Garance Delagneau, Stephen C. Bowden, Shayden Bryce, Kristi van-der-EL, Matthew Hamilton, Sophie Adams, Liz Burgat, Eoin Killackey, Debra Rickwood, Kelly Allott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: A growing number of quantitative studies have investigated the utility of neuropsychological assessment in mental health settings. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has qualitatively explored youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services. A more in-depth understanding of the perceived advantages and barriers associated with neuropsychological assessment in youth mental health settings is critical to better inform policy, practice and service uptake. Thus, the aim of this study was to qualitatively explore clinicians' views about neuropsychological assessments for youth with mental health concerns. Methods: A single open-ended qualitative question, included as part of an anonymous cross-sectional online survey, was completed by clinicians (N = 206) treating or assessing adolescents and young adults within Australian primary care mental health centres (headspace). Responses were analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Five main themes were identified. Clinicians (a) identified barriers to accessing neuropsychological assessments (53%), (b) indicated a range of mixed outcomes following neuropsychological assessment (39%), (c) highlighted a need for neuropsychological assessments (22%), (d) reported a lack of awareness about this resource (10%) and (e) described practice issues associated with neuropsychological services (4%). Conclusion: This study uncovered perceived factors contributing to reduced access to neuropsychological assessment in Australian youth mental health settings. Given potential adverse outcomes resulting from this clinical service gap, efforts should be made to address factors contributing to poorer access, thereby mitigating the impact of poor access on the management of mental illness in youth. Several strategies, including funding neuropsychological assessments, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Needs Assessment
Young Adult
Primary Health Care
Cross-Sectional Studies

Cite this

Delagneau, G., Bowden, S. C., Bryce, S., van-der-EL, K., Hamilton, M., Adams, S., ... Allott, K. (2019). Thematic analysis of youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12876
Delagneau, Garance ; Bowden, Stephen C. ; Bryce, Shayden ; van-der-EL, Kristi ; Hamilton, Matthew ; Adams, Sophie ; Burgat, Liz ; Killackey, Eoin ; Rickwood, Debra ; Allott, Kelly. / Thematic analysis of youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services. In: Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 2019 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{0f5ea0435cf44d4fbba99239e27eaaab,
title = "Thematic analysis of youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services",
abstract = "Aim: A growing number of quantitative studies have investigated the utility of neuropsychological assessment in mental health settings. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has qualitatively explored youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services. A more in-depth understanding of the perceived advantages and barriers associated with neuropsychological assessment in youth mental health settings is critical to better inform policy, practice and service uptake. Thus, the aim of this study was to qualitatively explore clinicians' views about neuropsychological assessments for youth with mental health concerns. Methods: A single open-ended qualitative question, included as part of an anonymous cross-sectional online survey, was completed by clinicians (N = 206) treating or assessing adolescents and young adults within Australian primary care mental health centres (headspace). Responses were analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Five main themes were identified. Clinicians (a) identified barriers to accessing neuropsychological assessments (53{\%}), (b) indicated a range of mixed outcomes following neuropsychological assessment (39{\%}), (c) highlighted a need for neuropsychological assessments (22{\%}), (d) reported a lack of awareness about this resource (10{\%}) and (e) described practice issues associated with neuropsychological services (4{\%}). Conclusion: This study uncovered perceived factors contributing to reduced access to neuropsychological assessment in Australian youth mental health settings. Given potential adverse outcomes resulting from this clinical service gap, efforts should be made to address factors contributing to poorer access, thereby mitigating the impact of poor access on the management of mental illness in youth. Several strategies, including funding neuropsychological assessments, are discussed.",
keywords = "headspace, neuropsychological assessment, youth mental health",
author = "Garance Delagneau and Bowden, {Stephen C.} and Shayden Bryce and Kristi van-der-EL and Matthew Hamilton and Sophie Adams and Liz Burgat and Eoin Killackey and Debra Rickwood and Kelly Allott",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1111/eip.12876",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Early Intervention in Psychiatry (Online)",
issn = "1751-7885",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Delagneau, G, Bowden, SC, Bryce, S, van-der-EL, K, Hamilton, M, Adams, S, Burgat, L, Killackey, E, Rickwood, D & Allott, K 2019, 'Thematic analysis of youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services', Early Intervention in Psychiatry, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12876

Thematic analysis of youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services. / Delagneau, Garance; Bowden, Stephen C.; Bryce, Shayden; van-der-EL, Kristi; Hamilton, Matthew; Adams, Sophie; Burgat, Liz; Killackey, Eoin; Rickwood, Debra; Allott, Kelly.

In: Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 11.09.2019, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thematic analysis of youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services

AU - Delagneau, Garance

AU - Bowden, Stephen C.

AU - Bryce, Shayden

AU - van-der-EL, Kristi

AU - Hamilton, Matthew

AU - Adams, Sophie

AU - Burgat, Liz

AU - Killackey, Eoin

AU - Rickwood, Debra

AU - Allott, Kelly

PY - 2019/9/11

Y1 - 2019/9/11

N2 - Aim: A growing number of quantitative studies have investigated the utility of neuropsychological assessment in mental health settings. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has qualitatively explored youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services. A more in-depth understanding of the perceived advantages and barriers associated with neuropsychological assessment in youth mental health settings is critical to better inform policy, practice and service uptake. Thus, the aim of this study was to qualitatively explore clinicians' views about neuropsychological assessments for youth with mental health concerns. Methods: A single open-ended qualitative question, included as part of an anonymous cross-sectional online survey, was completed by clinicians (N = 206) treating or assessing adolescents and young adults within Australian primary care mental health centres (headspace). Responses were analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Five main themes were identified. Clinicians (a) identified barriers to accessing neuropsychological assessments (53%), (b) indicated a range of mixed outcomes following neuropsychological assessment (39%), (c) highlighted a need for neuropsychological assessments (22%), (d) reported a lack of awareness about this resource (10%) and (e) described practice issues associated with neuropsychological services (4%). Conclusion: This study uncovered perceived factors contributing to reduced access to neuropsychological assessment in Australian youth mental health settings. Given potential adverse outcomes resulting from this clinical service gap, efforts should be made to address factors contributing to poorer access, thereby mitigating the impact of poor access on the management of mental illness in youth. Several strategies, including funding neuropsychological assessments, are discussed.

AB - Aim: A growing number of quantitative studies have investigated the utility of neuropsychological assessment in mental health settings. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has qualitatively explored youth mental health providers' perceptions of neuropsychological assessment services. A more in-depth understanding of the perceived advantages and barriers associated with neuropsychological assessment in youth mental health settings is critical to better inform policy, practice and service uptake. Thus, the aim of this study was to qualitatively explore clinicians' views about neuropsychological assessments for youth with mental health concerns. Methods: A single open-ended qualitative question, included as part of an anonymous cross-sectional online survey, was completed by clinicians (N = 206) treating or assessing adolescents and young adults within Australian primary care mental health centres (headspace). Responses were analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Five main themes were identified. Clinicians (a) identified barriers to accessing neuropsychological assessments (53%), (b) indicated a range of mixed outcomes following neuropsychological assessment (39%), (c) highlighted a need for neuropsychological assessments (22%), (d) reported a lack of awareness about this resource (10%) and (e) described practice issues associated with neuropsychological services (4%). Conclusion: This study uncovered perceived factors contributing to reduced access to neuropsychological assessment in Australian youth mental health settings. Given potential adverse outcomes resulting from this clinical service gap, efforts should be made to address factors contributing to poorer access, thereby mitigating the impact of poor access on the management of mental illness in youth. Several strategies, including funding neuropsychological assessments, are discussed.

KW - headspace

KW - neuropsychological assessment

KW - youth mental health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073927164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/thematic-analysis-youth-mental-health-providers-perceptions-neuropsychological-assessment-services

U2 - 10.1111/eip.12876

DO - 10.1111/eip.12876

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Early Intervention in Psychiatry (Online)

JF - Early Intervention in Psychiatry (Online)

SN - 1751-7885

ER -