Thinking about Fuel Management

The Potential of Integrative Complexity Theory to Inform Design of Communication about Fuel Management Used To Reduce Wildfire Risk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Multiple studies have examined ‘what’ people think about fuel management (perceptions); fewer have examined ‘how’ people think about it (structure of thoughts). In an Australian study, we used Integrative Complexity Theory (ICT) to explore the relationship between how complexly people thought about, and how acceptable they found, three fuel management strategies: prescribed burning, mechanical thinning and livestock grazing. Integrative complexity (IC) was associated with the direction of acceptability of the most familiar practice - prescribed burning, but trust in organizations was associated with acceptability of all strategies. IC was associated with the extremity of acceptability, with higher IC associated with more moderate attitudes. Our findings support the argument that targeting communication to (i) match current IC and (ii) encourage growth in complexity of thinking has potential to encourage more moderate and stable attitudes about fuel management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)983-1002
Number of pages20
JournalSociety and Natural Resources
Volume32
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

wildfire
communication
management
prescribed burning
targeting
thinning
livestock
grazing

Cite this

@article{35b0b3304f734c799946fb890a62e563,
title = "Thinking about Fuel Management: The Potential of Integrative Complexity Theory to Inform Design of Communication about Fuel Management Used To Reduce Wildfire Risk",
abstract = "Multiple studies have examined ‘what’ people think about fuel management (perceptions); fewer have examined ‘how’ people think about it (structure of thoughts). In an Australian study, we used Integrative Complexity Theory (ICT) to explore the relationship between how complexly people thought about, and how acceptable they found, three fuel management strategies: prescribed burning, mechanical thinning and livestock grazing. Integrative complexity (IC) was associated with the direction of acceptability of the most familiar practice - prescribed burning, but trust in organizations was associated with acceptability of all strategies. IC was associated with the extremity of acceptability, with higher IC associated with more moderate attitudes. Our findings support the argument that targeting communication to (i) match current IC and (ii) encourage growth in complexity of thinking has potential to encourage more moderate and stable attitudes about fuel management.",
keywords = "Acceptability, attitudes, fuel management, Integrative Complexity Theory, wildfire, wildland fire",
author = "Mylek, {Melinda R.} and Jacki Schirmer",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/08941920.2019.1597232",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "983--1002",
journal = "Society Natural Resources",
issn = "0894-1920",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking about Fuel Management

T2 - The Potential of Integrative Complexity Theory to Inform Design of Communication about Fuel Management Used To Reduce Wildfire Risk

AU - Mylek, Melinda R.

AU - Schirmer, Jacki

PY - 2019/4/23

Y1 - 2019/4/23

N2 - Multiple studies have examined ‘what’ people think about fuel management (perceptions); fewer have examined ‘how’ people think about it (structure of thoughts). In an Australian study, we used Integrative Complexity Theory (ICT) to explore the relationship between how complexly people thought about, and how acceptable they found, three fuel management strategies: prescribed burning, mechanical thinning and livestock grazing. Integrative complexity (IC) was associated with the direction of acceptability of the most familiar practice - prescribed burning, but trust in organizations was associated with acceptability of all strategies. IC was associated with the extremity of acceptability, with higher IC associated with more moderate attitudes. Our findings support the argument that targeting communication to (i) match current IC and (ii) encourage growth in complexity of thinking has potential to encourage more moderate and stable attitudes about fuel management.

AB - Multiple studies have examined ‘what’ people think about fuel management (perceptions); fewer have examined ‘how’ people think about it (structure of thoughts). In an Australian study, we used Integrative Complexity Theory (ICT) to explore the relationship between how complexly people thought about, and how acceptable they found, three fuel management strategies: prescribed burning, mechanical thinning and livestock grazing. Integrative complexity (IC) was associated with the direction of acceptability of the most familiar practice - prescribed burning, but trust in organizations was associated with acceptability of all strategies. IC was associated with the extremity of acceptability, with higher IC associated with more moderate attitudes. Our findings support the argument that targeting communication to (i) match current IC and (ii) encourage growth in complexity of thinking has potential to encourage more moderate and stable attitudes about fuel management.

KW - Acceptability

KW - attitudes

KW - fuel management

KW - Integrative Complexity Theory

KW - wildfire

KW - wildland fire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064751413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/thinking-about-fuel-management-potential-integrative-complexity-theory-inform-design-communication-a

U2 - 10.1080/08941920.2019.1597232

DO - 10.1080/08941920.2019.1597232

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 983

EP - 1002

JO - Society Natural Resources

JF - Society Natural Resources

SN - 0894-1920

IS - 9

ER -