Time, Casuality and Character in Descartes' Meditations

Michael Campbell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    René Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy (1641)1 is a work steeped in temporality. The text is divided into six ‘meditations’ that are purported to occur over six ‘days’. While Descartes’ theory of temporality was not a major aspect of his thought,2 it appears in various works, most significantly in the Meditations, as well as in the Replies to the Objections (CSM, II: 66-397), and the Principles of Philosophy (CSM, I: 177-291). This article will explore the notions of temporality found within these texts, particularly the Meditations. I suggest that a reflection on Descartes’ concept of temporality is of particular interest when considered in the light of the manner in which the text itself is temporal. The temporality of the Meditations is a fictional temporality; the ‘days’ of the Meditations do not, I would suggest, represent the real historical days in which Descartes was writing this text. These fictive and stylistic elements can influence the way the text is read. Consequently, I will be drawing on theories of narrative to frame the discussion, particularly concepts of experientiality and narrativity proposed by Monika Fludernik.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)107-126
    Number of pages20
    JournalParrhesia
    Volume24
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Meditation
    Temporality
    Fictive
    Narrativity
    Philosophy
    First philosophy
    Thought
    Fiction
    Theory of Narrative

    Cite this

    Campbell, Michael. / Time, Casuality and Character in Descartes' Meditations. In: Parrhesia. 2015 ; Vol. 24. pp. 107-126.
    @article{6ddd2d037efa4271bb281bd9f28d47c5,
    title = "Time, Casuality and Character in Descartes' Meditations",
    abstract = "Ren{\'e} Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy (1641)1 is a work steeped in temporality. The text is divided into six ‘meditations’ that are purported to occur over six ‘days’. While Descartes’ theory of temporality was not a major aspect of his thought,2 it appears in various works, most significantly in the Meditations, as well as in the Replies to the Objections (CSM, II: 66-397), and the Principles of Philosophy (CSM, I: 177-291). This article will explore the notions of temporality found within these texts, particularly the Meditations. I suggest that a reflection on Descartes’ concept of temporality is of particular interest when considered in the light of the manner in which the text itself is temporal. The temporality of the Meditations is a fictional temporality; the ‘days’ of the Meditations do not, I would suggest, represent the real historical days in which Descartes was writing this text. These fictive and stylistic elements can influence the way the text is read. Consequently, I will be drawing on theories of narrative to frame the discussion, particularly concepts of experientiality and narrativity proposed by Monika Fludernik.",
    keywords = "Philosophy, Narratology, Descartes",
    author = "Michael Campbell",
    year = "2015",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "107--126",
    journal = "Parrhesia",
    issn = "1834-3287",

    }

    Campbell, M 2015, 'Time, Casuality and Character in Descartes' Meditations', Parrhesia, vol. 24, pp. 107-126.

    Time, Casuality and Character in Descartes' Meditations. / Campbell, Michael.

    In: Parrhesia, Vol. 24, 2015, p. 107-126.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Time, Casuality and Character in Descartes' Meditations

    AU - Campbell, Michael

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - René Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy (1641)1 is a work steeped in temporality. The text is divided into six ‘meditations’ that are purported to occur over six ‘days’. While Descartes’ theory of temporality was not a major aspect of his thought,2 it appears in various works, most significantly in the Meditations, as well as in the Replies to the Objections (CSM, II: 66-397), and the Principles of Philosophy (CSM, I: 177-291). This article will explore the notions of temporality found within these texts, particularly the Meditations. I suggest that a reflection on Descartes’ concept of temporality is of particular interest when considered in the light of the manner in which the text itself is temporal. The temporality of the Meditations is a fictional temporality; the ‘days’ of the Meditations do not, I would suggest, represent the real historical days in which Descartes was writing this text. These fictive and stylistic elements can influence the way the text is read. Consequently, I will be drawing on theories of narrative to frame the discussion, particularly concepts of experientiality and narrativity proposed by Monika Fludernik.

    AB - René Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy (1641)1 is a work steeped in temporality. The text is divided into six ‘meditations’ that are purported to occur over six ‘days’. While Descartes’ theory of temporality was not a major aspect of his thought,2 it appears in various works, most significantly in the Meditations, as well as in the Replies to the Objections (CSM, II: 66-397), and the Principles of Philosophy (CSM, I: 177-291). This article will explore the notions of temporality found within these texts, particularly the Meditations. I suggest that a reflection on Descartes’ concept of temporality is of particular interest when considered in the light of the manner in which the text itself is temporal. The temporality of the Meditations is a fictional temporality; the ‘days’ of the Meditations do not, I would suggest, represent the real historical days in which Descartes was writing this text. These fictive and stylistic elements can influence the way the text is read. Consequently, I will be drawing on theories of narrative to frame the discussion, particularly concepts of experientiality and narrativity proposed by Monika Fludernik.

    KW - Philosophy

    KW - Narratology

    KW - Descartes

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 107

    EP - 126

    JO - Parrhesia

    JF - Parrhesia

    SN - 1834-3287

    ER -