TY - JOUR
T1 - To Grow or Control, That is the Question: San Francisco's Planning Transformation in the 1980s and 1990s
AU - HU, Richard
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The City of Sydney’s urban planning philosophy and practice experienced fundamental
changes in the 1980s and 1990s. In the post-World War decades, Sydney’s urban
planning was characterized by a laissez faire tradition which exempted any attempt to plan
and control the city. Furthermore, this laissez faire context was interrelated with the
conflicts of planning powers between the New South Wales State Government and its
agencies, and the Sydney City Council. However, this ad hoc planning approach and
conflict-ridden planning politics between tiers of governments appeared to give way to a
converged recognition of the importance of planning intervention and concerted planning
actions among major stakeholders in the pursuit of a global Sydney in the 1980s and the
1990s. This article attempts to address two questions of the urban planning transformation
in Sydney: (1) how did the transformation occur? and (2) what were the thematic patterns
of the transformation? This article describes Sydney’s historical planning background,
makes a content analysis of benchmark strategic plan documents – The City of Sydney
Strategic Plan (1971–1983) and Central Sydney Strategy (1988), and narrates the
planning practices in the pre-Olympics 2000 years. This article finally concludes the thematic
patterns of urban planning transformations in Sydney in the 1980s and 1990s: the intergovernmental
consensus on visioning and planning for a global Sydney, the thematic planning
transformations including the emergence of entrepreneurial planning with the prominence of
economic planning, the neutralization of the social planning, and the emphasis on urban
design in the physical planning.
AB - The City of Sydney’s urban planning philosophy and practice experienced fundamental
changes in the 1980s and 1990s. In the post-World War decades, Sydney’s urban
planning was characterized by a laissez faire tradition which exempted any attempt to plan
and control the city. Furthermore, this laissez faire context was interrelated with the
conflicts of planning powers between the New South Wales State Government and its
agencies, and the Sydney City Council. However, this ad hoc planning approach and
conflict-ridden planning politics between tiers of governments appeared to give way to a
converged recognition of the importance of planning intervention and concerted planning
actions among major stakeholders in the pursuit of a global Sydney in the 1980s and the
1990s. This article attempts to address two questions of the urban planning transformation
in Sydney: (1) how did the transformation occur? and (2) what were the thematic patterns
of the transformation? This article describes Sydney’s historical planning background,
makes a content analysis of benchmark strategic plan documents – The City of Sydney
Strategic Plan (1971–1983) and Central Sydney Strategy (1988), and narrates the
planning practices in the pre-Olympics 2000 years. This article finally concludes the thematic
patterns of urban planning transformations in Sydney in the 1980s and 1990s: the intergovernmental
consensus on visioning and planning for a global Sydney, the thematic planning
transformations including the emergence of entrepreneurial planning with the prominence of
economic planning, the neutralization of the social planning, and the emphasis on urban
design in the physical planning.
KW - global Sydney
KW - urban planning
KW - transformation
KW - thematic patterns
U2 - 10.1177/1538513211419041
DO - 10.1177/1538513211419041
M3 - Article
SN - 1538-5132
VL - 11
SP - 141
EP - 160
JO - Journal of Planning History
JF - Journal of Planning History
IS - 2
ER -