Topographic determinants of faunal nestedness in Great Basin butterfly assemblages: Applications to conservation planning

Erica Fleishman, R. Mac Nally

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    39 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We examined factors possibly responsible for a nested distributional pattern of resident butterflies in the Toquima Range, a mountain range in the Great Basin of western North America. In related analyses, Poisson-based modeling indicated that species richness is better explained as a function of elevation and local topographic heterogeneity than by area per se. Therefore, we explored whether area, elevation, and topographic heterogeneity affected relative degree of nestedness. Elevation and topographic heterogeneity not only explained a significant percentage of the total deviance in species richness but also may be responsible for generating nested species distributions. The species-presence matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model was significantly more nested than the matrix ordered by area. The matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model also was significantly more nested than matrices ordered by three other environmental variables that did not explain significant variance in species richness, indicating that the model is unlikely to be an artifact. The influence of area on distribution patterns may be relatively slight because it was not significantly correlated with species richness or topographic heterogeneity in this system. Elevation covaried with both species richness and area, but the former correlation was positive and the latter was negative. Our results suggest that faunal richness and compositional patterns are related to independent variables that can be measured extensively—through satellite or airborne telemetry—thus reducing dependence on labor-intensive measurements of habitat. Because nestedness analyses may help reveal causes, or at least correlates, of species composition, we believe they are a promising tool for conservation planning.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)422-429
    Number of pages8
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume16
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    nestedness
    conservation planning
    butterfly
    butterflies
    planning
    basins
    species diversity
    species richness
    basin
    matrix
    artifact
    labor
    biogeography
    mountains
    environmental factors
    habitat
    habitats
    modeling

    Cite this

    @article{3276e505104b4de89d0a5e7142239e1a,
    title = "Topographic determinants of faunal nestedness in Great Basin butterfly assemblages: Applications to conservation planning",
    abstract = "We examined factors possibly responsible for a nested distributional pattern of resident butterflies in the Toquima Range, a mountain range in the Great Basin of western North America. In related analyses, Poisson-based modeling indicated that species richness is better explained as a function of elevation and local topographic heterogeneity than by area per se. Therefore, we explored whether area, elevation, and topographic heterogeneity affected relative degree of nestedness. Elevation and topographic heterogeneity not only explained a significant percentage of the total deviance in species richness but also may be responsible for generating nested species distributions. The species-presence matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model was significantly more nested than the matrix ordered by area. The matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model also was significantly more nested than matrices ordered by three other environmental variables that did not explain significant variance in species richness, indicating that the model is unlikely to be an artifact. The influence of area on distribution patterns may be relatively slight because it was not significantly correlated with species richness or topographic heterogeneity in this system. Elevation covaried with both species richness and area, but the former correlation was positive and the latter was negative. Our results suggest that faunal richness and compositional patterns are related to independent variables that can be measured extensively—through satellite or airborne telemetry—thus reducing dependence on labor-intensive measurements of habitat. Because nestedness analyses may help reveal causes, or at least correlates, of species composition, we believe they are a promising tool for conservation planning.",
    author = "Erica Fleishman and {Mac Nally}, R.",
    note = "Cited By :36 Export Date: 6 June 2017",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00362.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "422--429",
    journal = "Conservation Biology",
    issn = "0888-8892",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    Topographic determinants of faunal nestedness in Great Basin butterfly assemblages: Applications to conservation planning. / Fleishman, Erica; Mac Nally, R.

    In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2002, p. 422-429.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Topographic determinants of faunal nestedness in Great Basin butterfly assemblages: Applications to conservation planning

    AU - Fleishman, Erica

    AU - Mac Nally, R.

    N1 - Cited By :36 Export Date: 6 June 2017

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - We examined factors possibly responsible for a nested distributional pattern of resident butterflies in the Toquima Range, a mountain range in the Great Basin of western North America. In related analyses, Poisson-based modeling indicated that species richness is better explained as a function of elevation and local topographic heterogeneity than by area per se. Therefore, we explored whether area, elevation, and topographic heterogeneity affected relative degree of nestedness. Elevation and topographic heterogeneity not only explained a significant percentage of the total deviance in species richness but also may be responsible for generating nested species distributions. The species-presence matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model was significantly more nested than the matrix ordered by area. The matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model also was significantly more nested than matrices ordered by three other environmental variables that did not explain significant variance in species richness, indicating that the model is unlikely to be an artifact. The influence of area on distribution patterns may be relatively slight because it was not significantly correlated with species richness or topographic heterogeneity in this system. Elevation covaried with both species richness and area, but the former correlation was positive and the latter was negative. Our results suggest that faunal richness and compositional patterns are related to independent variables that can be measured extensively—through satellite or airborne telemetry—thus reducing dependence on labor-intensive measurements of habitat. Because nestedness analyses may help reveal causes, or at least correlates, of species composition, we believe they are a promising tool for conservation planning.

    AB - We examined factors possibly responsible for a nested distributional pattern of resident butterflies in the Toquima Range, a mountain range in the Great Basin of western North America. In related analyses, Poisson-based modeling indicated that species richness is better explained as a function of elevation and local topographic heterogeneity than by area per se. Therefore, we explored whether area, elevation, and topographic heterogeneity affected relative degree of nestedness. Elevation and topographic heterogeneity not only explained a significant percentage of the total deviance in species richness but also may be responsible for generating nested species distributions. The species-presence matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model was significantly more nested than the matrix ordered by area. The matrix ordered by the elevation-heterogeneity model also was significantly more nested than matrices ordered by three other environmental variables that did not explain significant variance in species richness, indicating that the model is unlikely to be an artifact. The influence of area on distribution patterns may be relatively slight because it was not significantly correlated with species richness or topographic heterogeneity in this system. Elevation covaried with both species richness and area, but the former correlation was positive and the latter was negative. Our results suggest that faunal richness and compositional patterns are related to independent variables that can be measured extensively—through satellite or airborne telemetry—thus reducing dependence on labor-intensive measurements of habitat. Because nestedness analyses may help reveal causes, or at least correlates, of species composition, we believe they are a promising tool for conservation planning.

    U2 - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00362.x

    DO - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00362.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 422

    EP - 429

    JO - Conservation Biology

    JF - Conservation Biology

    SN - 0888-8892

    IS - 2

    ER -