Torturing the rule of law: USA and the post 9-11 world

Jackson Maogoto, Benedict SHEEHY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The reaction of the USA after the September 11, 2001 attacks, including its invasion of Afghanistan and subsequent unilateral military campaign in Iraq, and various executive and legislative actions has been not merely a quiet abandonment of the Rule of Law, but through its so-called -War on Terror-, a concerted attack on the Rule of Law. In this paper we shall examine that attack on those principles, through an examination of cases, executive actions, legislations, and international law. While the authors recognize the mythical nature of the Rule of Law, they maintain that it is a useful myth in that it helps actors predict with reasonable certainty, the actions what will be accepted internationally (as between nations), help make good policy decisions and anticipate the actions of others. Furthermore, it operates as an ideal to aim for and a standard against which states' actions can be judged.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-725
Number of pages37
JournalSt. John's Journal of Legal Commentary
Volume21
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

constitutional state
September 11, 2001
invasion
Afghanistan
international law
Iraq
terrorism
myth
campaign
legislation
Military
examination

Cite this

@article{2ee48ca106914218b27b64c3c8669781,
title = "Torturing the rule of law: USA and the post 9-11 world",
abstract = "The reaction of the USA after the September 11, 2001 attacks, including its invasion of Afghanistan and subsequent unilateral military campaign in Iraq, and various executive and legislative actions has been not merely a quiet abandonment of the Rule of Law, but through its so-called -War on Terror-, a concerted attack on the Rule of Law. In this paper we shall examine that attack on those principles, through an examination of cases, executive actions, legislations, and international law. While the authors recognize the mythical nature of the Rule of Law, they maintain that it is a useful myth in that it helps actors predict with reasonable certainty, the actions what will be accepted internationally (as between nations), help make good policy decisions and anticipate the actions of others. Furthermore, it operates as an ideal to aim for and a standard against which states' actions can be judged.",
author = "Jackson Maogoto and Benedict SHEEHY",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "689--725",
journal = "St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary",
issn = "1049-0299",
number = "3",

}

Torturing the rule of law: USA and the post 9-11 world. / Maogoto, Jackson; SHEEHY, Benedict.

In: St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2007, p. 689-725.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Torturing the rule of law: USA and the post 9-11 world

AU - Maogoto, Jackson

AU - SHEEHY, Benedict

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The reaction of the USA after the September 11, 2001 attacks, including its invasion of Afghanistan and subsequent unilateral military campaign in Iraq, and various executive and legislative actions has been not merely a quiet abandonment of the Rule of Law, but through its so-called -War on Terror-, a concerted attack on the Rule of Law. In this paper we shall examine that attack on those principles, through an examination of cases, executive actions, legislations, and international law. While the authors recognize the mythical nature of the Rule of Law, they maintain that it is a useful myth in that it helps actors predict with reasonable certainty, the actions what will be accepted internationally (as between nations), help make good policy decisions and anticipate the actions of others. Furthermore, it operates as an ideal to aim for and a standard against which states' actions can be judged.

AB - The reaction of the USA after the September 11, 2001 attacks, including its invasion of Afghanistan and subsequent unilateral military campaign in Iraq, and various executive and legislative actions has been not merely a quiet abandonment of the Rule of Law, but through its so-called -War on Terror-, a concerted attack on the Rule of Law. In this paper we shall examine that attack on those principles, through an examination of cases, executive actions, legislations, and international law. While the authors recognize the mythical nature of the Rule of Law, they maintain that it is a useful myth in that it helps actors predict with reasonable certainty, the actions what will be accepted internationally (as between nations), help make good policy decisions and anticipate the actions of others. Furthermore, it operates as an ideal to aim for and a standard against which states' actions can be judged.

UR - https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:7468

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 689

EP - 725

JO - St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary

JF - St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary

SN - 1049-0299

IS - 3

ER -