Toward a Global Deliberative System for Genome Editing

Research output: Contribution to journalOther Journal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite widespread agreement on the need for public participation in genome editing governance, questions remain about how best to structure citizen deliberation such that it can better inform policymaking. Representative and transformative conversations are not necessarily enabled by random sampling. Reflecting on lessons learned from recent citizens’ juries and assemblies, in this essay I identify group-building, skilling up, recruiting invested participants, and over-sampling of marginal discourses as strategies to advance the contribution of citizen deliberation to a global deliberative system for human heritable genome editing governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalCRISPR Journal
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Global Deliberative System for Genome Editing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this