Towards a ‘Social Anthropology’ of End-of-Life Moral Deliberation

A Study of Australian Salvation Army Officers

Andrew Cameron, Bruce Stevens, Rhonda Shaw, Peter Bewert, Mavis Salt, Jennifer Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A research project by the Schools of Theology and Psychology of Australia’s Charles Sturt University surveyed a large sample of Salvation Army officers. This article considers survey responses to two questions relating to end-of-life care: the use of pain medications that may shorten life, and the cessation of fluid and food intake. The results of the analyses are evaluated in terms of Michael Banner’s proposal that moral theology should more assiduously converse with
‘patient ethnographic study’, which the survey instantiates to some extent. Banner’s proposal and the results of the survey are contrasted to Peter Singer’s analytical moral philosophical dictums on end-of-life care. The results are also compared to a metastudy by Andrea Rodríguez-Prat and Evert van Leeuwen of 14 ethnographic studies of those who wish to hasten death at the end of
life. We conclude that respondents exemplify a form of moral reasoning that is embedded within Christian spirituality; counters the assumptions of Singer’s approach; contrasts the diminishment of ‘meaning’ at the end of life, as seen in Rodríguez-Prat and van Leeuwen; and deserves further respectful ethnographic study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalStudies in Christian Ethics
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Salvation Army
Moral Deliberation
Ethnographic Study
End of Life
Social Anthropology
End of Life Care
Intake
Banner
Psychology
Research Projects
Food
Medication
Christian Spirituality
Moral Reasoning
Wishes
Singers
Theology
Peter Singer
Dictum
Pain

Cite this

Cameron, Andrew ; Stevens, Bruce ; Shaw, Rhonda ; Bewert, Peter ; Salt, Mavis ; Ma, Jennifer. / Towards a ‘Social Anthropology’ of End-of-Life Moral Deliberation : A Study of Australian Salvation Army Officers. In: Studies in Christian Ethics. 2019 ; pp. 1-19.
@article{4a62c307d435470eb14c2ab6e9de446f,
title = "Towards a ‘Social Anthropology’ of End-of-Life Moral Deliberation: A Study of Australian Salvation Army Officers",
abstract = "A research project by the Schools of Theology and Psychology of Australia’s Charles Sturt University surveyed a large sample of Salvation Army officers. This article considers survey responses to two questions relating to end-of-life care: the use of pain medications that may shorten life, and the cessation of fluid and food intake. The results of the analyses are evaluated in terms of Michael Banner’s proposal that moral theology should more assiduously converse with‘patient ethnographic study’, which the survey instantiates to some extent. Banner’s proposal and the results of the survey are contrasted to Peter Singer’s analytical moral philosophical dictums on end-of-life care. The results are also compared to a metastudy by Andrea Rodr{\'i}guez-Prat and Evert van Leeuwen of 14 ethnographic studies of those who wish to hasten death at the end oflife. We conclude that respondents exemplify a form of moral reasoning that is embedded within Christian spirituality; counters the assumptions of Singer’s approach; contrasts the diminishment of ‘meaning’ at the end of life, as seen in Rodr{\'i}guez-Prat and van Leeuwen; and deserves further respectful ethnographic study.",
keywords = "Salvation Army officers, burdensome treatment, double effect, end of life, euthanasia, social anthropology, withdrawal of treatment",
author = "Andrew Cameron and Bruce Stevens and Rhonda Shaw and Peter Bewert and Mavis Salt and Jennifer Ma",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1177/0953946819847996",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Studies in Christian Ethics",
issn = "0953-9468",
publisher = "Sheffield Academic Press Ltd",

}

Towards a ‘Social Anthropology’ of End-of-Life Moral Deliberation : A Study of Australian Salvation Army Officers. / Cameron, Andrew; Stevens, Bruce; Shaw, Rhonda; Bewert, Peter; Salt, Mavis; Ma, Jennifer.

In: Studies in Christian Ethics, 29.05.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a ‘Social Anthropology’ of End-of-Life Moral Deliberation

T2 - A Study of Australian Salvation Army Officers

AU - Cameron, Andrew

AU - Stevens, Bruce

AU - Shaw, Rhonda

AU - Bewert, Peter

AU - Salt, Mavis

AU - Ma, Jennifer

PY - 2019/5/29

Y1 - 2019/5/29

N2 - A research project by the Schools of Theology and Psychology of Australia’s Charles Sturt University surveyed a large sample of Salvation Army officers. This article considers survey responses to two questions relating to end-of-life care: the use of pain medications that may shorten life, and the cessation of fluid and food intake. The results of the analyses are evaluated in terms of Michael Banner’s proposal that moral theology should more assiduously converse with‘patient ethnographic study’, which the survey instantiates to some extent. Banner’s proposal and the results of the survey are contrasted to Peter Singer’s analytical moral philosophical dictums on end-of-life care. The results are also compared to a metastudy by Andrea Rodríguez-Prat and Evert van Leeuwen of 14 ethnographic studies of those who wish to hasten death at the end oflife. We conclude that respondents exemplify a form of moral reasoning that is embedded within Christian spirituality; counters the assumptions of Singer’s approach; contrasts the diminishment of ‘meaning’ at the end of life, as seen in Rodríguez-Prat and van Leeuwen; and deserves further respectful ethnographic study.

AB - A research project by the Schools of Theology and Psychology of Australia’s Charles Sturt University surveyed a large sample of Salvation Army officers. This article considers survey responses to two questions relating to end-of-life care: the use of pain medications that may shorten life, and the cessation of fluid and food intake. The results of the analyses are evaluated in terms of Michael Banner’s proposal that moral theology should more assiduously converse with‘patient ethnographic study’, which the survey instantiates to some extent. Banner’s proposal and the results of the survey are contrasted to Peter Singer’s analytical moral philosophical dictums on end-of-life care. The results are also compared to a metastudy by Andrea Rodríguez-Prat and Evert van Leeuwen of 14 ethnographic studies of those who wish to hasten death at the end oflife. We conclude that respondents exemplify a form of moral reasoning that is embedded within Christian spirituality; counters the assumptions of Singer’s approach; contrasts the diminishment of ‘meaning’ at the end of life, as seen in Rodríguez-Prat and van Leeuwen; and deserves further respectful ethnographic study.

KW - Salvation Army officers

KW - burdensome treatment

KW - double effect

KW - end of life

KW - euthanasia

KW - social anthropology

KW - withdrawal of treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067289511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/towards-social-anthropology-endoflife-moral-deliberation-study-australian-salvation-army-officers

U2 - 10.1177/0953946819847996

DO - 10.1177/0953946819847996

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Studies in Christian Ethics

JF - Studies in Christian Ethics

SN - 0953-9468

ER -