TY - JOUR
T1 - Transformation as system innovation
T2 - insights from Nepal’s five decades of community forestry development
AU - Ojha, Hemant
AU - Hall, Andy
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the financial assistance of the CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council and CSIRO strategic investment project funding for a project titled ‘Changing the conversation on agri-food system innovation’. We acknowledge Jeroen Dijkman for his suggestion that Nepal community forestry would make a useful case study of transformational change. Liekwise, we acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped greatly in strengthening the paper. Finally, the first co-author would also like to acknowledge two research proejcts from which he drew current insights into community forestry in Nepal: Governing Climate Resilient Futures: 1) ‘Gender, Justice and Conflict Resolution in Resource Management’ (JUSTCLIME), funded by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet Diarienummer: 2018-05866); 2) EnLiFT research project, Enhancing Livelihoods and Food Security from Agroforestry and Community Forestry in Nepal, funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (FST/2011/076).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021/4/26
Y1 - 2021/4/26
N2 - Studies of sustainability transitions and transformational change are common in energy and transport sectors. However, there is limited research on how these transformational change processes play out in the natural resources sector, particularly in developing economies. This paper seeks to address this gap, with a case study of the community forestry system in Nepal that has, over the last four decades, reversed Himalayan land degradation and contributed to community livelihoods. The case illustrates comprehensive changes in forest management practices and governance over four decades. Central to this was a ‘thinking movement’ of development agencies, activists and researchers that opened up learning spaces and engage conflicting stakeholders in action-oriented dialogues. While transformation can never be pre-engineered, this study suggests that investment in strengthening locally engaged research capability could be a key way of catalyzing sustainability transitions, both as a continuous process of evolution and transformative shifts during the crisis and political opportunity.
AB - Studies of sustainability transitions and transformational change are common in energy and transport sectors. However, there is limited research on how these transformational change processes play out in the natural resources sector, particularly in developing economies. This paper seeks to address this gap, with a case study of the community forestry system in Nepal that has, over the last four decades, reversed Himalayan land degradation and contributed to community livelihoods. The case illustrates comprehensive changes in forest management practices and governance over four decades. Central to this was a ‘thinking movement’ of development agencies, activists and researchers that opened up learning spaces and engage conflicting stakeholders in action-oriented dialogues. While transformation can never be pre-engineered, this study suggests that investment in strengthening locally engaged research capability could be a key way of catalyzing sustainability transitions, both as a continuous process of evolution and transformative shifts during the crisis and political opportunity.
KW - Natural resources management
KW - Nepal
KW - action and knoweldge
KW - environmental transition
KW - system innovation
KW - transformation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114404722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/2157930X.2021.1917112
DO - 10.1080/2157930X.2021.1917112
M3 - Article
SN - 2157-930X
VL - 13
SP - 109
EP - 131
JO - Innovation and Development
JF - Innovation and Development
IS - 1
ER -