Transformative climate change adaptation

Bridging existing approaches with post-foundational insights on justice

Jane Mummery, Josephine Mummery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Climate adaptation is a complex policy domain, spanning multiple sectors, scales and actors, and wherein those most at risk have the least power. The influence of linear positivist models of science uptake are proving ineffective in a world with increasingly concentrated wealth and power, institutional barriers, and rapidly growing risks facing the many. A plurality of approaches is needed to better examine those dynamics of climate adaptation which are often invisible in models of science uptake–equity, the value of contestation, path dependency–and to consider how to empower communities to find solutions. In this conceptual paper, we argue that bridging existing positivist and interpretivist methods with insights from post-foundational theory so as to underpin pluralism and re-orient ethical principles of justice, strengthens the capacity of social research to support transformative climate adaptation. Principles are proposed to facilitate such bridging.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)919-930
Number of pages12
JournalLocal Environment
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

climate change
justice
climate
science
social research
pluralism
community
climate change adaptation
Values
method
policy
world

Cite this

@article{aa73c90ff002493f9972baf3f10261da,
title = "Transformative climate change adaptation: Bridging existing approaches with post-foundational insights on justice",
abstract = "Climate adaptation is a complex policy domain, spanning multiple sectors, scales and actors, and wherein those most at risk have the least power. The influence of linear positivist models of science uptake are proving ineffective in a world with increasingly concentrated wealth and power, institutional barriers, and rapidly growing risks facing the many. A plurality of approaches is needed to better examine those dynamics of climate adaptation which are often invisible in models of science uptake–equity, the value of contestation, path dependency–and to consider how to empower communities to find solutions. In this conceptual paper, we argue that bridging existing positivist and interpretivist methods with insights from post-foundational theory so as to underpin pluralism and re-orient ethical principles of justice, strengthens the capacity of social research to support transformative climate adaptation. Principles are proposed to facilitate such bridging.",
keywords = "bridging practices, Climate change adaptation, climate justice, transformative adaptation",
author = "Jane Mummery and Josephine Mummery",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/13549839.2019.1656180",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "919--930",
journal = "Local Environment",
issn = "1354-9839",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

Transformative climate change adaptation : Bridging existing approaches with post-foundational insights on justice. / Mummery, Jane; Mummery, Josephine.

In: Local Environment, Vol. 24, No. 10, 2019, p. 919-930.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transformative climate change adaptation

T2 - Bridging existing approaches with post-foundational insights on justice

AU - Mummery, Jane

AU - Mummery, Josephine

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Climate adaptation is a complex policy domain, spanning multiple sectors, scales and actors, and wherein those most at risk have the least power. The influence of linear positivist models of science uptake are proving ineffective in a world with increasingly concentrated wealth and power, institutional barriers, and rapidly growing risks facing the many. A plurality of approaches is needed to better examine those dynamics of climate adaptation which are often invisible in models of science uptake–equity, the value of contestation, path dependency–and to consider how to empower communities to find solutions. In this conceptual paper, we argue that bridging existing positivist and interpretivist methods with insights from post-foundational theory so as to underpin pluralism and re-orient ethical principles of justice, strengthens the capacity of social research to support transformative climate adaptation. Principles are proposed to facilitate such bridging.

AB - Climate adaptation is a complex policy domain, spanning multiple sectors, scales and actors, and wherein those most at risk have the least power. The influence of linear positivist models of science uptake are proving ineffective in a world with increasingly concentrated wealth and power, institutional barriers, and rapidly growing risks facing the many. A plurality of approaches is needed to better examine those dynamics of climate adaptation which are often invisible in models of science uptake–equity, the value of contestation, path dependency–and to consider how to empower communities to find solutions. In this conceptual paper, we argue that bridging existing positivist and interpretivist methods with insights from post-foundational theory so as to underpin pluralism and re-orient ethical principles of justice, strengthens the capacity of social research to support transformative climate adaptation. Principles are proposed to facilitate such bridging.

KW - bridging practices

KW - Climate change adaptation

KW - climate justice

KW - transformative adaptation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070863749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13549839.2019.1656180

DO - 10.1080/13549839.2019.1656180

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 919

EP - 930

JO - Local Environment

JF - Local Environment

SN - 1354-9839

IS - 10

ER -