TY - JOUR
T1 - Transforming environmental governance
T2 - critical action intellectuals and their praxis in the field
AU - Ojha, Hemant
AU - Nightingale, Andrea J.
AU - Gonda, Noémi
AU - Muok, Benard Oula
AU - Eriksen, Siri
AU - Khatri, Dil
AU - Paudel, Dinesh
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is primarily associated with "Governing Climate Resilient Futures: gender, justice and conflict resolution in resource management (Vetenskapsrådet, Grant Number : 2018-05866). In addition, Hemant Ojha and Andrea Nightingale also acknowledge the support by “Conflict, Violence and Environmental Change: Investigating resource governance and legitimacy in transitional societies” funded by Vetenskapsradet (Diarienummer: 2015-03323). Nightingale’s contribution was further supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement [grant no. 764908-WEGO 2018-2021]. In August 2020, while we were writing this article, Benito Maria a CAI with whom one of the co-authors has been collaborating was assassinated in Guatemala. His engagement alongside indigenous communities was instrumental in their struggles for recognition. May this article be part of a tribute to his work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Over the past decade, widespread concern has emerged over how environmental governance can be transformed to avoid impending catastrophes such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and livelihood insecurity. A variety of approaches have emerged, focusing on either politics, technological breakthrough, social movements, or macro-economic processes as the main drivers of change. In contrast, this paper presents theoretical insights about how systemic change in environmental governance can be triggered by critical and intellectually grounded social actors in specific contexts of environment and development. Conceptualising such actors as critical action intellectuals (CAI), we analyze how CAI emerge in specific socio-environmental contexts and contribute to systemic change in governance. CAI trigger transformative change by shifting policy discourse, generating alternative evidence, and challenging dominant policy assumptions, whilst aiming to empower marginalized groups. While CAI do not work in a vacuum, nor are the sole force in transformation, we nevertheless show that the praxis of CAI within fields of environmental governance has the potential to trigger transformation. We illustrate this through three cases of natural resource governance in Nepal, Nicaragua and Guatemala, and Kenya, where the authors themselves have engaged as CAI. We contribute to theorising the ‘how’ of transformation by showing the ways CAI praxis reshape fields of governance and catalyze transformation, distinct from, and at times complementary to, other dominant drivers such as social movements, macroeconomic processes or technological breakthroughs.
AB - Over the past decade, widespread concern has emerged over how environmental governance can be transformed to avoid impending catastrophes such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and livelihood insecurity. A variety of approaches have emerged, focusing on either politics, technological breakthrough, social movements, or macro-economic processes as the main drivers of change. In contrast, this paper presents theoretical insights about how systemic change in environmental governance can be triggered by critical and intellectually grounded social actors in specific contexts of environment and development. Conceptualising such actors as critical action intellectuals (CAI), we analyze how CAI emerge in specific socio-environmental contexts and contribute to systemic change in governance. CAI trigger transformative change by shifting policy discourse, generating alternative evidence, and challenging dominant policy assumptions, whilst aiming to empower marginalized groups. While CAI do not work in a vacuum, nor are the sole force in transformation, we nevertheless show that the praxis of CAI within fields of environmental governance has the potential to trigger transformation. We illustrate this through three cases of natural resource governance in Nepal, Nicaragua and Guatemala, and Kenya, where the authors themselves have engaged as CAI. We contribute to theorising the ‘how’ of transformation by showing the ways CAI praxis reshape fields of governance and catalyze transformation, distinct from, and at times complementary to, other dominant drivers such as social movements, macroeconomic processes or technological breakthroughs.
KW - Critical action intellectuals
KW - Environmental governance
KW - Praxis
KW - Social field
KW - Transformation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125096723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11625-022-01108-z
DO - 10.1007/s11625-022-01108-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125096723
SN - 1862-4065
VL - 17
SP - 621
EP - 635
JO - Sustainability Science
JF - Sustainability Science
IS - 2
ER -