Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook

Jacqueline Tunnecliff, John Weiner, Jamie GAIDA, Jennifer Keating, Dragan Ilic, Lynette Clearihan, David Davies, Sivalal Sadasivan, Patitapaban Mohanty, S. R. Ganesh, John Reynolds, Stephen Maloney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-408
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Health Occupations
Research
Tendinopathy
Health

Cite this

Tunnecliff, Jacqueline ; Weiner, John ; GAIDA, Jamie ; Keating, Jennifer ; Ilic, Dragan ; Clearihan, Lynette ; Davies, David ; Sadasivan, Sivalal ; Mohanty, Patitapaban ; Ganesh, S. R. ; Reynolds, John ; Maloney, Stephen. / Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 403-408.
@article{34c773654ddb4770a8383934e9e2744e,
title = "Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook",
abstract = "Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive {"}practice points{"} on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P",
keywords = "Communication, Computer-assisted instruction, Education, Evidence-based practice, Professional, Social media",
author = "Jacqueline Tunnecliff and John Weiner and Jamie GAIDA and Jennifer Keating and Dragan Ilic and Lynette Clearihan and David Davies and Sivalal Sadasivan and Patitapaban Mohanty and Ganesh, {S. R.} and John Reynolds and Stephen Maloney",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocw085",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "403--408",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Tunnecliff, J, Weiner, J, GAIDA, J, Keating, J, Ilic, D, Clearihan, L, Davies, D, Sadasivan, S, Mohanty, P, Ganesh, SR, Reynolds, J & Maloney, S 2017, 'Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw085

Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook. / Tunnecliff, Jacqueline; Weiner, John; GAIDA, Jamie; Keating, Jennifer; Ilic, Dragan; Clearihan, Lynette; Davies, David; Sadasivan, Sivalal; Mohanty, Patitapaban; Ganesh, S. R.; Reynolds, John; Maloney, Stephen.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 24, No. 2, 03.2017, p. 403-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook

AU - Tunnecliff, Jacqueline

AU - Weiner, John

AU - GAIDA, Jamie

AU - Keating, Jennifer

AU - Ilic, Dragan

AU - Clearihan, Lynette

AU - Davies, David

AU - Sadasivan, Sivalal

AU - Mohanty, Patitapaban

AU - Ganesh, S. R.

AU - Reynolds, John

AU - Maloney, Stephen

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P

AB - Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P

KW - Communication

KW - Computer-assisted instruction

KW - Education

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Professional

KW - Social media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016334323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/translating-evidence-practice-health-professions-randomized-trial-twitter-vs-facebook

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocw085

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocw085

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 403

EP - 408

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 2

ER -