Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook

Jacqueline Tunnecliff, John Weiner, Jamie GAIDA, Jennifer Keating, Dragan Ilic, Lynette Clearihan, David Davies, Sivalal Sadasivan, Patitapaban Mohanty, S. R. Ganesh, John Reynolds, Stephen Maloney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-408
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this