Transnational democracy in an insecure world

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

If global governance is consequential, its legitimacy ought to rest on principles of democracy. However, unilateral action such as that taken by the USA in Iraq and elsewhere has hurt the most visible such project, cosmopolitan democracy, by undermining its liberal multilateralist foundations. Other democratic projects have not been quite so badly damaged, in particular, the idea of a transnational discursive democracy grounded in the engagement of discourses in international public spheres. The discourse aspects of international affairs are important when it comes to issues of war and peace, conflict and security, no less so here than elsewhere. Democracy faces competition in the informal realm of discourses from both the "war of ideas" and "soft power" projections, but can hold up well against them, and can more easily pass the test of reflexivity. Discursive democracy can help constitute effective responses to global insecurity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-119
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Political Science Review
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democracy
discourse
global governance
reflexivity
Iraq
projection
peace
legitimacy

Cite this

@article{ed9d2fdfdaf34863afa4733e5c7605ef,
title = "Transnational democracy in an insecure world",
abstract = "If global governance is consequential, its legitimacy ought to rest on principles of democracy. However, unilateral action such as that taken by the USA in Iraq and elsewhere has hurt the most visible such project, cosmopolitan democracy, by undermining its liberal multilateralist foundations. Other democratic projects have not been quite so badly damaged, in particular, the idea of a transnational discursive democracy grounded in the engagement of discourses in international public spheres. The discourse aspects of international affairs are important when it comes to issues of war and peace, conflict and security, no less so here than elsewhere. Democracy faces competition in the informal realm of discourses from both the {"}war of ideas{"} and {"}soft power{"} projections, but can hold up well against them, and can more easily pass the test of reflexivity. Discursive democracy can help constitute effective responses to global insecurity.",
keywords = "Cosmopolitanism, Discursive democracy, Global governance, International public spheres, Soft power",
author = "Dryzek, {John S.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0192512106061421",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "101--119",
journal = "International Political Science Review",
issn = "0192-5121",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Transnational democracy in an insecure world. / Dryzek, John S.

In: International Political Science Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 04.2006, p. 101-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transnational democracy in an insecure world

AU - Dryzek, John S.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - If global governance is consequential, its legitimacy ought to rest on principles of democracy. However, unilateral action such as that taken by the USA in Iraq and elsewhere has hurt the most visible such project, cosmopolitan democracy, by undermining its liberal multilateralist foundations. Other democratic projects have not been quite so badly damaged, in particular, the idea of a transnational discursive democracy grounded in the engagement of discourses in international public spheres. The discourse aspects of international affairs are important when it comes to issues of war and peace, conflict and security, no less so here than elsewhere. Democracy faces competition in the informal realm of discourses from both the "war of ideas" and "soft power" projections, but can hold up well against them, and can more easily pass the test of reflexivity. Discursive democracy can help constitute effective responses to global insecurity.

AB - If global governance is consequential, its legitimacy ought to rest on principles of democracy. However, unilateral action such as that taken by the USA in Iraq and elsewhere has hurt the most visible such project, cosmopolitan democracy, by undermining its liberal multilateralist foundations. Other democratic projects have not been quite so badly damaged, in particular, the idea of a transnational discursive democracy grounded in the engagement of discourses in international public spheres. The discourse aspects of international affairs are important when it comes to issues of war and peace, conflict and security, no less so here than elsewhere. Democracy faces competition in the informal realm of discourses from both the "war of ideas" and "soft power" projections, but can hold up well against them, and can more easily pass the test of reflexivity. Discursive democracy can help constitute effective responses to global insecurity.

KW - Cosmopolitanism

KW - Discursive democracy

KW - Global governance

KW - International public spheres

KW - Soft power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645655483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0192512106061421

DO - 10.1177/0192512106061421

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 101

EP - 119

JO - International Political Science Review

JF - International Political Science Review

SN - 0192-5121

IS - 2

ER -