Trends in public participation

Part 2 - Citizens' perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

170 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The findings reported below are drawn from 30 focus group discussions carried out with citizens in 11 contrasting local authority areas. Particular attention was paid to recruiting citizens from traditionally excluded groups, including people from minority ethnic groups and from disadvantaged areas. Each focus group involved ten participants (each of whom received a small honorarium) and lasted around an hour and a half. There were four different types of focus groups: 'Participators' - those who had participated in a local authority initiative. 'Activists' - people from local community and voluntary organizations. Young people - from local colleges and youth groups. 'Ordinary citizens' - randomly selected by a market research agency. Half of the focus groups, therefore, concentrated upon individuals who had some knowledge of, or contact with, local government, while the other half addressed those who were largely detached from local politics. (For further details of the research methodology, including the topic guides employed, see Lowndes et al. 1998.) While not claiming to be in any way 'representative' of public opinion, the focus groups provided an opportunity for in-depth research into citizens' own accounts of their relationships with local government. This article presents our research findings (in the context of other relevant research) on why it is that citizens do participate, and why - more often - they do not.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-455
Number of pages11
JournalPublic Administration
Volume79
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

citizen
participation
trend
Group
honorarium
youth group
market research
local politics
group discussion
public opinion
ethnic group
minority
contact
methodology
community

Cite this

@article{4efb5795c57048f8b10f3c604c2d9886,
title = "Trends in public participation: Part 2 - Citizens' perspectives",
abstract = "The findings reported below are drawn from 30 focus group discussions carried out with citizens in 11 contrasting local authority areas. Particular attention was paid to recruiting citizens from traditionally excluded groups, including people from minority ethnic groups and from disadvantaged areas. Each focus group involved ten participants (each of whom received a small honorarium) and lasted around an hour and a half. There were four different types of focus groups: 'Participators' - those who had participated in a local authority initiative. 'Activists' - people from local community and voluntary organizations. Young people - from local colleges and youth groups. 'Ordinary citizens' - randomly selected by a market research agency. Half of the focus groups, therefore, concentrated upon individuals who had some knowledge of, or contact with, local government, while the other half addressed those who were largely detached from local politics. (For further details of the research methodology, including the topic guides employed, see Lowndes et al. 1998.) While not claiming to be in any way 'representative' of public opinion, the focus groups provided an opportunity for in-depth research into citizens' own accounts of their relationships with local government. This article presents our research findings (in the context of other relevant research) on why it is that citizens do participate, and why - more often - they do not.",
author = "Vivien Lowndes and Lawrence Pratchett and Gerry Stoker",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "445--455",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Trends in public participation : Part 2 - Citizens' perspectives. / Lowndes, Vivien; Pratchett, Lawrence; Stoker, Gerry.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 79, No. 2, 2001, p. 445-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends in public participation

T2 - Part 2 - Citizens' perspectives

AU - Lowndes, Vivien

AU - Pratchett, Lawrence

AU - Stoker, Gerry

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The findings reported below are drawn from 30 focus group discussions carried out with citizens in 11 contrasting local authority areas. Particular attention was paid to recruiting citizens from traditionally excluded groups, including people from minority ethnic groups and from disadvantaged areas. Each focus group involved ten participants (each of whom received a small honorarium) and lasted around an hour and a half. There were four different types of focus groups: 'Participators' - those who had participated in a local authority initiative. 'Activists' - people from local community and voluntary organizations. Young people - from local colleges and youth groups. 'Ordinary citizens' - randomly selected by a market research agency. Half of the focus groups, therefore, concentrated upon individuals who had some knowledge of, or contact with, local government, while the other half addressed those who were largely detached from local politics. (For further details of the research methodology, including the topic guides employed, see Lowndes et al. 1998.) While not claiming to be in any way 'representative' of public opinion, the focus groups provided an opportunity for in-depth research into citizens' own accounts of their relationships with local government. This article presents our research findings (in the context of other relevant research) on why it is that citizens do participate, and why - more often - they do not.

AB - The findings reported below are drawn from 30 focus group discussions carried out with citizens in 11 contrasting local authority areas. Particular attention was paid to recruiting citizens from traditionally excluded groups, including people from minority ethnic groups and from disadvantaged areas. Each focus group involved ten participants (each of whom received a small honorarium) and lasted around an hour and a half. There were four different types of focus groups: 'Participators' - those who had participated in a local authority initiative. 'Activists' - people from local community and voluntary organizations. Young people - from local colleges and youth groups. 'Ordinary citizens' - randomly selected by a market research agency. Half of the focus groups, therefore, concentrated upon individuals who had some knowledge of, or contact with, local government, while the other half addressed those who were largely detached from local politics. (For further details of the research methodology, including the topic guides employed, see Lowndes et al. 1998.) While not claiming to be in any way 'representative' of public opinion, the focus groups provided an opportunity for in-depth research into citizens' own accounts of their relationships with local government. This article presents our research findings (in the context of other relevant research) on why it is that citizens do participate, and why - more often - they do not.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034944922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 445

EP - 455

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 2

ER -