Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world?

Ann Harding, Mandy Yap, Rachel Lloyd

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    Abstract

    Many of us empathise with the line in Midnight Oil’s song, Read about it, where, ‘The rich get richer, the poor get the picture’. Surveys reveal that Australians believe the gap between rich and poor is growing. But is this just a perception or is it based on fact? In this issue of the AMP.NATSEM Income and Wealth Report, we compare the income of households by postcode based on figures from the 1996 and 2001 Census to determine who exactly is getting richer, and whether any groups have been left behind. This report follows on from the first AMP.NATSEM Report on ‘Trends in Taxable Income’ which examined taxation statistics by postcode to determine the most affluent and the poorest areas of the nation. This time, the report divides postcodes into ten equal groups according to gross income to reveal: • where the most affluent and poorest areas of Australia are located • who has benefited from the past few years of strong economic growth and falling unemployment • how household incomes in 2001 compare with those of 1996 • which regions have fared well and which ones haven’t during the five years between 1996 and 2001, and • income, education, employment and homeownership differences between the Top 10% and Bottom 10%, with some surprising results!
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationSydney
    PublisherAMP
    Number of pages16
    Volume8
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Publication series

    NameIncome and Wealth Report
    PublisherAMP/NATSEM

    Fingerprint

    money
    income
    trend
    household income
    taxation
    song
    unemployment
    census
    economic growth
    Group
    statistics
    education

    Cite this

    Harding, A., Yap, M., & Lloyd, R. (2004). Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world? (Income and Wealth Report). Sydney: AMP.
    Harding, Ann ; Yap, Mandy ; Lloyd, Rachel. / Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world?. Sydney : AMP, 2004. (Income and Wealth Report).
    @techreport{41d65c2835ac4b28a3e36b8d8a443331,
    title = "Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world?",
    abstract = "Many of us empathise with the line in Midnight Oil’s song, Read about it, where, ‘The rich get richer, the poor get the picture’. Surveys reveal that Australians believe the gap between rich and poor is growing. But is this just a perception or is it based on fact? In this issue of the AMP.NATSEM Income and Wealth Report, we compare the income of households by postcode based on figures from the 1996 and 2001 Census to determine who exactly is getting richer, and whether any groups have been left behind. This report follows on from the first AMP.NATSEM Report on ‘Trends in Taxable Income’ which examined taxation statistics by postcode to determine the most affluent and the poorest areas of the nation. This time, the report divides postcodes into ten equal groups according to gross income to reveal: • where the most affluent and poorest areas of Australia are located • who has benefited from the past few years of strong economic growth and falling unemployment • how household incomes in 2001 compare with those of 1996 • which regions have fared well and which ones haven’t during the five years between 1996 and 2001, and • income, education, employment and homeownership differences between the Top 10{\%} and Bottom 10{\%}, with some surprising results!",
    author = "Ann Harding and Mandy Yap and Rachel Lloyd",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    series = "Income and Wealth Report",
    publisher = "AMP",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "AMP",

    }

    Harding, A, Yap, M & Lloyd, R 2004 'Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world?' Income and Wealth Report, AMP, Sydney.

    Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world? / Harding, Ann; Yap, Mandy; Lloyd, Rachel.

    Sydney : AMP, 2004. (Income and Wealth Report).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world?

    AU - Harding, Ann

    AU - Yap, Mandy

    AU - Lloyd, Rachel

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - Many of us empathise with the line in Midnight Oil’s song, Read about it, where, ‘The rich get richer, the poor get the picture’. Surveys reveal that Australians believe the gap between rich and poor is growing. But is this just a perception or is it based on fact? In this issue of the AMP.NATSEM Income and Wealth Report, we compare the income of households by postcode based on figures from the 1996 and 2001 Census to determine who exactly is getting richer, and whether any groups have been left behind. This report follows on from the first AMP.NATSEM Report on ‘Trends in Taxable Income’ which examined taxation statistics by postcode to determine the most affluent and the poorest areas of the nation. This time, the report divides postcodes into ten equal groups according to gross income to reveal: • where the most affluent and poorest areas of Australia are located • who has benefited from the past few years of strong economic growth and falling unemployment • how household incomes in 2001 compare with those of 1996 • which regions have fared well and which ones haven’t during the five years between 1996 and 2001, and • income, education, employment and homeownership differences between the Top 10% and Bottom 10%, with some surprising results!

    AB - Many of us empathise with the line in Midnight Oil’s song, Read about it, where, ‘The rich get richer, the poor get the picture’. Surveys reveal that Australians believe the gap between rich and poor is growing. But is this just a perception or is it based on fact? In this issue of the AMP.NATSEM Income and Wealth Report, we compare the income of households by postcode based on figures from the 1996 and 2001 Census to determine who exactly is getting richer, and whether any groups have been left behind. This report follows on from the first AMP.NATSEM Report on ‘Trends in Taxable Income’ which examined taxation statistics by postcode to determine the most affluent and the poorest areas of the nation. This time, the report divides postcodes into ten equal groups according to gross income to reveal: • where the most affluent and poorest areas of Australia are located • who has benefited from the past few years of strong economic growth and falling unemployment • how household incomes in 2001 compare with those of 1996 • which regions have fared well and which ones haven’t during the five years between 1996 and 2001, and • income, education, employment and homeownership differences between the Top 10% and Bottom 10%, with some surprising results!

    M3 - Discussion paper

    VL - 8

    T3 - Income and Wealth Report

    BT - Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world?

    PB - AMP

    CY - Sydney

    ER -

    Harding A, Yap M, Lloyd R. Trends in spatial income inequality, 1996 to 2001 : Money, money, money – is this a rich man’s world? Sydney: AMP. 2004. (Income and Wealth Report).