Troll Theory?

Issue 22: Trolls and the Negative Space of the Internet

Glen FULLER, Jason Wilson, Christian McCrea

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

    33 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We only talk about trolls inside a polemic. To aver that someone is trolling is to allege that their participation conceals the aims of their disruption; by implication, they are to be excluded or dismissed. The Internet’s folk wisdom for trolls says: ‘Do not feed them!’ This remedy rests on a belief that acknowledgement and interaction are the barest matters of subsistence in an attention economy. To call out a troll is thus to recognise who ought or ought not speak or be listened to. Since to describe an interlocutor as a troll is to invite a third party to put them beyond the pale, the charge is often contested. We can understand this as, at once, an artefact of agonistic politics and as an attempt to avoid it. It is reassertion of the ‘table manners’ (Arditi, 2006) of liberal civility; like any such insistence it can be a way of forestalling political demands made outside the current limits of acceptability in political contention (Tomlinson, 2010; Shaw, 2012). It can also be used to redefine these demands as so much unintelligible noise (Rancière, 2011)
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberFCJ-22
    Pages (from-to)1-15
    Number of pages15
    JournalFibreculture Journal
    Volume22
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    wisdom
    remedies
    artifact
    Internet
    participation
    economy
    politics
    interaction

    Cite this

    FULLER, Glen ; Wilson, Jason ; McCrea, Christian. / Troll Theory? Issue 22: Trolls and the Negative Space of the Internet. In: Fibreculture Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 22. pp. 1-15.
    @article{d968e0940a674cc0b398631eec49201a,
    title = "Troll Theory?: Issue 22: Trolls and the Negative Space of the Internet",
    abstract = "We only talk about trolls inside a polemic. To aver that someone is trolling is to allege that their participation conceals the aims of their disruption; by implication, they are to be excluded or dismissed. The Internet’s folk wisdom for trolls says: ‘Do not feed them!’ This remedy rests on a belief that acknowledgement and interaction are the barest matters of subsistence in an attention economy. To call out a troll is thus to recognise who ought or ought not speak or be listened to. Since to describe an interlocutor as a troll is to invite a third party to put them beyond the pale, the charge is often contested. We can understand this as, at once, an artefact of agonistic politics and as an attempt to avoid it. It is reassertion of the ‘table manners’ (Arditi, 2006) of liberal civility; like any such insistence it can be a way of forestalling political demands made outside the current limits of acceptability in political contention (Tomlinson, 2010; Shaw, 2012). It can also be used to redefine these demands as so much unintelligible noise (Ranci{\`e}re, 2011)",
    keywords = "Trolls, Internet, Social Media, online communities",
    author = "Glen FULLER and Jason Wilson and Christian McCrea",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "1--15",
    journal = "Fibreculture Journal",
    issn = "1449-1443",

    }

    Troll Theory? Issue 22: Trolls and the Negative Space of the Internet. / FULLER, Glen; Wilson, Jason; McCrea, Christian.

    In: Fibreculture Journal, Vol. 22, FCJ-22, 2013, p. 1-15.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Troll Theory?

    T2 - Issue 22: Trolls and the Negative Space of the Internet

    AU - FULLER, Glen

    AU - Wilson, Jason

    AU - McCrea, Christian

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - We only talk about trolls inside a polemic. To aver that someone is trolling is to allege that their participation conceals the aims of their disruption; by implication, they are to be excluded or dismissed. The Internet’s folk wisdom for trolls says: ‘Do not feed them!’ This remedy rests on a belief that acknowledgement and interaction are the barest matters of subsistence in an attention economy. To call out a troll is thus to recognise who ought or ought not speak or be listened to. Since to describe an interlocutor as a troll is to invite a third party to put them beyond the pale, the charge is often contested. We can understand this as, at once, an artefact of agonistic politics and as an attempt to avoid it. It is reassertion of the ‘table manners’ (Arditi, 2006) of liberal civility; like any such insistence it can be a way of forestalling political demands made outside the current limits of acceptability in political contention (Tomlinson, 2010; Shaw, 2012). It can also be used to redefine these demands as so much unintelligible noise (Rancière, 2011)

    AB - We only talk about trolls inside a polemic. To aver that someone is trolling is to allege that their participation conceals the aims of their disruption; by implication, they are to be excluded or dismissed. The Internet’s folk wisdom for trolls says: ‘Do not feed them!’ This remedy rests on a belief that acknowledgement and interaction are the barest matters of subsistence in an attention economy. To call out a troll is thus to recognise who ought or ought not speak or be listened to. Since to describe an interlocutor as a troll is to invite a third party to put them beyond the pale, the charge is often contested. We can understand this as, at once, an artefact of agonistic politics and as an attempt to avoid it. It is reassertion of the ‘table manners’ (Arditi, 2006) of liberal civility; like any such insistence it can be a way of forestalling political demands made outside the current limits of acceptability in political contention (Tomlinson, 2010; Shaw, 2012). It can also be used to redefine these demands as so much unintelligible noise (Rancière, 2011)

    KW - Trolls

    KW - Internet

    KW - Social Media

    KW - online communities

    M3 - Editorial

    VL - 22

    SP - 1

    EP - 15

    JO - Fibreculture Journal

    JF - Fibreculture Journal

    SN - 1449-1443

    M1 - FCJ-22

    ER -