Turning the Tables

Power Relations between Consumer Researchers and other Mental Health Researchers

Brenda Happell, Sarah Gordon, Julia Bocking, Pete Ellis, Cath Roper, Jackie Liggins, Brett Scholz, Chris Platania-Phung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A crucial development resulting from consumer involvement in mental health services has been engagement as active participants in mental health research, often conducted in collaboration with mental health researchers representing the health disciplines (referred to in this paper as ‘other’ researchers). Despite progress in mental health consumer research, unequal power relations continue to pose a major barrier. Although power issues are discussed in the literature, there is little research from the perspective of other mental health researchers who have collaborated with consumers on research projects. This qualitative study explored other mental health researchers' perspectives on the role of power in collaborative research with consumers. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 11 other mental health researchers. Thematic analysis of the transcript version of interview recordings was conducted. The findings were grounded in ‘the table’ as a literal and metaphorical site of power relations. The umbrella theme was prominence and presence (of consumers) at the table, followed by subthemes on barriers (tokenism, undermined potential) and surmounting them through reworking power (critical mass and openness to power dynamics). Overall it was found that while there continue to be significant power-related barriers to further building of robust collaborative research with consumers in mental health, there are several avenues that should be considered, much more assertively, to disrupt and transcend them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-640
Number of pages8
JournalIssues in Mental Health Nursing
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Research Personnel
Research
Interviews
Mental Health Services
Power (Psychology)
Health

Cite this

Happell, B., Gordon, S., Bocking, J., Ellis, P., Roper, C., Liggins, J., ... Platania-Phung, C. (2018). Turning the Tables: Power Relations between Consumer Researchers and other Mental Health Researchers. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39(8), 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1445328
Happell, Brenda ; Gordon, Sarah ; Bocking, Julia ; Ellis, Pete ; Roper, Cath ; Liggins, Jackie ; Scholz, Brett ; Platania-Phung, Chris. / Turning the Tables : Power Relations between Consumer Researchers and other Mental Health Researchers. In: Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 633-640.
@article{a0f0971fb06347df899cffdfaf1d4699,
title = "Turning the Tables: Power Relations between Consumer Researchers and other Mental Health Researchers",
abstract = "A crucial development resulting from consumer involvement in mental health services has been engagement as active participants in mental health research, often conducted in collaboration with mental health researchers representing the health disciplines (referred to in this paper as ‘other’ researchers). Despite progress in mental health consumer research, unequal power relations continue to pose a major barrier. Although power issues are discussed in the literature, there is little research from the perspective of other mental health researchers who have collaborated with consumers on research projects. This qualitative study explored other mental health researchers' perspectives on the role of power in collaborative research with consumers. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 11 other mental health researchers. Thematic analysis of the transcript version of interview recordings was conducted. The findings were grounded in ‘the table’ as a literal and metaphorical site of power relations. The umbrella theme was prominence and presence (of consumers) at the table, followed by subthemes on barriers (tokenism, undermined potential) and surmounting them through reworking power (critical mass and openness to power dynamics). Overall it was found that while there continue to be significant power-related barriers to further building of robust collaborative research with consumers in mental health, there are several avenues that should be considered, much more assertively, to disrupt and transcend them.",
author = "Brenda Happell and Sarah Gordon and Julia Bocking and Pete Ellis and Cath Roper and Jackie Liggins and Brett Scholz and Chris Platania-Phung",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/01612840.2018.1445328",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "633--640",
journal = "Issues in Mental Health Nursing",
issn = "0161-2840",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "8",

}

Happell, B, Gordon, S, Bocking, J, Ellis, P, Roper, C, Liggins, J, Scholz, B & Platania-Phung, C 2018, 'Turning the Tables: Power Relations between Consumer Researchers and other Mental Health Researchers', Issues in Mental Health Nursing, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1445328

Turning the Tables : Power Relations between Consumer Researchers and other Mental Health Researchers. / Happell, Brenda; Gordon, Sarah; Bocking, Julia; Ellis, Pete; Roper, Cath; Liggins, Jackie; Scholz, Brett; Platania-Phung, Chris.

In: Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2018, p. 633-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turning the Tables

T2 - Power Relations between Consumer Researchers and other Mental Health Researchers

AU - Happell, Brenda

AU - Gordon, Sarah

AU - Bocking, Julia

AU - Ellis, Pete

AU - Roper, Cath

AU - Liggins, Jackie

AU - Scholz, Brett

AU - Platania-Phung, Chris

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - A crucial development resulting from consumer involvement in mental health services has been engagement as active participants in mental health research, often conducted in collaboration with mental health researchers representing the health disciplines (referred to in this paper as ‘other’ researchers). Despite progress in mental health consumer research, unequal power relations continue to pose a major barrier. Although power issues are discussed in the literature, there is little research from the perspective of other mental health researchers who have collaborated with consumers on research projects. This qualitative study explored other mental health researchers' perspectives on the role of power in collaborative research with consumers. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 11 other mental health researchers. Thematic analysis of the transcript version of interview recordings was conducted. The findings were grounded in ‘the table’ as a literal and metaphorical site of power relations. The umbrella theme was prominence and presence (of consumers) at the table, followed by subthemes on barriers (tokenism, undermined potential) and surmounting them through reworking power (critical mass and openness to power dynamics). Overall it was found that while there continue to be significant power-related barriers to further building of robust collaborative research with consumers in mental health, there are several avenues that should be considered, much more assertively, to disrupt and transcend them.

AB - A crucial development resulting from consumer involvement in mental health services has been engagement as active participants in mental health research, often conducted in collaboration with mental health researchers representing the health disciplines (referred to in this paper as ‘other’ researchers). Despite progress in mental health consumer research, unequal power relations continue to pose a major barrier. Although power issues are discussed in the literature, there is little research from the perspective of other mental health researchers who have collaborated with consumers on research projects. This qualitative study explored other mental health researchers' perspectives on the role of power in collaborative research with consumers. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 11 other mental health researchers. Thematic analysis of the transcript version of interview recordings was conducted. The findings were grounded in ‘the table’ as a literal and metaphorical site of power relations. The umbrella theme was prominence and presence (of consumers) at the table, followed by subthemes on barriers (tokenism, undermined potential) and surmounting them through reworking power (critical mass and openness to power dynamics). Overall it was found that while there continue to be significant power-related barriers to further building of robust collaborative research with consumers in mental health, there are several avenues that should be considered, much more assertively, to disrupt and transcend them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047947877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/turning-tables-power-relations-between-consumer-researchers-other-mental-health-researchers

U2 - 10.1080/01612840.2018.1445328

DO - 10.1080/01612840.2018.1445328

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 633

EP - 640

JO - Issues in Mental Health Nursing

JF - Issues in Mental Health Nursing

SN - 0161-2840

IS - 8

ER -