Turning up the heat: partisanship in deliberative innovation

Carolyn Hendricks, John Dryzek, Christian Hunold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two forum types have featured prominently in deliberative practice: (1) forums involving partisans (such as key ‘stakeholders’) and (2) forums involving non-partisans (such as ‘lay citizens’). Drawing on deliberative theory and cases from Germany, we explore the relative merits of these forum types in terms of deliberative capacity, legitimacy and political impact. The two types offer deliberative governance something different. Non-partisan forums such as citizens' juries or consensus conferences rate favorably in deliberative capacity, but can fall short when it comes to external legitimacy and policy impact. Contrary to expectations, partisan forums can also encounter substantial legitimation and impact problems. How can designed forums contribute to deliberative democratization, given that partisanship is an inevitable fact of politics? We offer some suggestions about how deliberative theory and practice might better accommodate the reality of partisanship, while securing benefits revealed in non-partisan forums
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-383
Number of pages22
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

heat
legitimacy
citizen
innovation
political impact
legitimation
democratization
stakeholder
governance
politics

Cite this

Hendricks, Carolyn ; Dryzek, John ; Hunold, Christian. / Turning up the heat: partisanship in deliberative innovation. In: Political Studies. 2007 ; Vol. 55, No. 2. pp. 362-383.
@article{b2b0135134f74c2f9311d1a95fa305c8,
title = "Turning up the heat: partisanship in deliberative innovation",
abstract = "Two forum types have featured prominently in deliberative practice: (1) forums involving partisans (such as key ‘stakeholders’) and (2) forums involving non-partisans (such as ‘lay citizens’). Drawing on deliberative theory and cases from Germany, we explore the relative merits of these forum types in terms of deliberative capacity, legitimacy and political impact. The two types offer deliberative governance something different. Non-partisan forums such as citizens' juries or consensus conferences rate favorably in deliberative capacity, but can fall short when it comes to external legitimacy and policy impact. Contrary to expectations, partisan forums can also encounter substantial legitimation and impact problems. How can designed forums contribute to deliberative democratization, given that partisanship is an inevitable fact of politics? We offer some suggestions about how deliberative theory and practice might better accommodate the reality of partisanship, while securing benefits revealed in non-partisan forums",
author = "Carolyn Hendricks and John Dryzek and Christian Hunold",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "362--383",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Turning up the heat: partisanship in deliberative innovation. / Hendricks, Carolyn; Dryzek, John; Hunold, Christian.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2007, p. 362-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turning up the heat: partisanship in deliberative innovation

AU - Hendricks, Carolyn

AU - Dryzek, John

AU - Hunold, Christian

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Two forum types have featured prominently in deliberative practice: (1) forums involving partisans (such as key ‘stakeholders’) and (2) forums involving non-partisans (such as ‘lay citizens’). Drawing on deliberative theory and cases from Germany, we explore the relative merits of these forum types in terms of deliberative capacity, legitimacy and political impact. The two types offer deliberative governance something different. Non-partisan forums such as citizens' juries or consensus conferences rate favorably in deliberative capacity, but can fall short when it comes to external legitimacy and policy impact. Contrary to expectations, partisan forums can also encounter substantial legitimation and impact problems. How can designed forums contribute to deliberative democratization, given that partisanship is an inevitable fact of politics? We offer some suggestions about how deliberative theory and practice might better accommodate the reality of partisanship, while securing benefits revealed in non-partisan forums

AB - Two forum types have featured prominently in deliberative practice: (1) forums involving partisans (such as key ‘stakeholders’) and (2) forums involving non-partisans (such as ‘lay citizens’). Drawing on deliberative theory and cases from Germany, we explore the relative merits of these forum types in terms of deliberative capacity, legitimacy and political impact. The two types offer deliberative governance something different. Non-partisan forums such as citizens' juries or consensus conferences rate favorably in deliberative capacity, but can fall short when it comes to external legitimacy and policy impact. Contrary to expectations, partisan forums can also encounter substantial legitimation and impact problems. How can designed forums contribute to deliberative democratization, given that partisanship is an inevitable fact of politics? We offer some suggestions about how deliberative theory and practice might better accommodate the reality of partisanship, while securing benefits revealed in non-partisan forums

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 362

EP - 383

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 2

ER -