Two Cheers for Boswell and Corbett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This response acknowledges the importance of Boswell and Corbett’s contribution, arguing that their focus on impressions sits well, perhaps better than a focus on being systematic, with an interpretivist position. It continues by exploring the way in which different approaches to social science utilize ‘theory’, focusing particularly on how a critical realist would deal with some of the issues raised by Boswell and Corbett.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)230-233
    Number of pages4
    JournalCritical Policy Studies
    Volume9
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    social science theory

    Cite this

    MARSH, David. / Two Cheers for Boswell and Corbett. In: Critical Policy Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 230-233.
    @article{8607b55053484f37abca7f4c8add7384,
    title = "Two Cheers for Boswell and Corbett",
    abstract = "This response acknowledges the importance of Boswell and Corbett’s contribution, arguing that their focus on impressions sits well, perhaps better than a focus on being systematic, with an interpretivist position. It continues by exploring the way in which different approaches to social science utilize ‘theory’, focusing particularly on how a critical realist would deal with some of the issues raised by Boswell and Corbett.",
    author = "David MARSH",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/19460171.2015.1040253",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "230--233",
    journal = "Critical Policy Studies",
    issn = "1946-0171",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    Two Cheers for Boswell and Corbett. / MARSH, David.

    In: Critical Policy Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2015, p. 230-233.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Two Cheers for Boswell and Corbett

    AU - MARSH, David

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - This response acknowledges the importance of Boswell and Corbett’s contribution, arguing that their focus on impressions sits well, perhaps better than a focus on being systematic, with an interpretivist position. It continues by exploring the way in which different approaches to social science utilize ‘theory’, focusing particularly on how a critical realist would deal with some of the issues raised by Boswell and Corbett.

    AB - This response acknowledges the importance of Boswell and Corbett’s contribution, arguing that their focus on impressions sits well, perhaps better than a focus on being systematic, with an interpretivist position. It continues by exploring the way in which different approaches to social science utilize ‘theory’, focusing particularly on how a critical realist would deal with some of the issues raised by Boswell and Corbett.

    U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2015.1040253

    DO - 10.1080/19460171.2015.1040253

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 230

    EP - 233

    JO - Critical Policy Studies

    JF - Critical Policy Studies

    SN - 1946-0171

    IS - 2

    ER -