Two cheers for interpretivism: Deconstructing the British political tradition

David MARSH, Paul FAWCETT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article engages with Bevir and Rhodes' version of interpretivism from a critical realist perspective. It argues that they are misguided to equate path-dependency with path-determinancy. Instead, we argue that there are three path-dependencies, institutional, discursive and political-economic, which constrain without determining the actions of agents and thus effect political outcomes. The argument is illustrated through a brief consideration of the operation of the British Political Tradition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-348
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two cheers for interpretivism: Deconstructing the British political tradition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this