Understanding Biological Motion

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

The ultimate goal of biological motion perception is to be able to understand actions so as to provide an answer to the question, "Who did what to whom and why?" This inference capacity enables humans to go beyond the surface appearance of behavior in order to successfully interact with others and with the environment. In addition to its functional importance, understanding biological motion bridges several major fields, including perception, reasoning, and social cognition. However, despite its paramount role in human perception and cognition, only limited progress has so far been made in understanding biological motion. After reviewing the relevant literature, this essay argues that future research needs to identify the contributions of three basic processes involved in understanding biological motion: perception of animacy, causality, and intention. The involvement of these basic processes needs to be investigated both in the typical healthy population as well as in populations with mental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. We also suggest that a productive research approach should focus on more interactive actions of the sort often observed in the natural social environment, rather than solely using the single-actor displays that have been typical in previous work. It is further emphasized that there is a need for a theoretical and computational framework within which these different types of processing can be united. We propose that the predictive coding framework provides a good candidate.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEmerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
EditorsNancy Pinkerton, Robert A Scott, Stephen M Kosslyn
Place of PublicationNew York, United States
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
Pages1-14
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781118900772
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Display devices
Processing

Cite this

van Boxtel, J. J. A., & Lu, H. (2015). Understanding Biological Motion. In N. Pinkerton, R. A. Scott, & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 1-14). New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0374
van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A. ; Lu, Hongjing. / Understanding Biological Motion. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. editor / Nancy Pinkerton ; Robert A Scott ; Stephen M Kosslyn. New York, United States : John Wiley & Sons, 2015. pp. 1-14
@inbook{215615db076d4a35a8d1f9c604ad4ccb,
title = "Understanding Biological Motion",
abstract = "The ultimate goal of biological motion perception is to be able to understand actions so as to provide an answer to the question, {"}Who did what to whom and why?{"} This inference capacity enables humans to go beyond the surface appearance of behavior in order to successfully interact with others and with the environment. In addition to its functional importance, understanding biological motion bridges several major fields, including perception, reasoning, and social cognition. However, despite its paramount role in human perception and cognition, only limited progress has so far been made in understanding biological motion. After reviewing the relevant literature, this essay argues that future research needs to identify the contributions of three basic processes involved in understanding biological motion: perception of animacy, causality, and intention. The involvement of these basic processes needs to be investigated both in the typical healthy population as well as in populations with mental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. We also suggest that a productive research approach should focus on more interactive actions of the sort often observed in the natural social environment, rather than solely using the single-actor displays that have been typical in previous work. It is further emphasized that there is a need for a theoretical and computational framework within which these different types of processing can be united. We propose that the predictive coding framework provides a good candidate.",
keywords = "biological motion, intentions, animacy, causality, predictive coding, interaction, prediction",
author = "{van Boxtel}, {Jeroen J.A.} and Hongjing Lu",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0374",
language = "English",
pages = "1--14",
editor = "Nancy Pinkerton and Scott, {Robert A} and Kosslyn, {Stephen M}",
booktitle = "Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
address = "United States",

}

van Boxtel, JJA & Lu, H 2015, Understanding Biological Motion. in N Pinkerton, RA Scott & SM Kosslyn (eds), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York, United States, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0374

Understanding Biological Motion. / van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A.; Lu, Hongjing.

Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. ed. / Nancy Pinkerton; Robert A Scott; Stephen M Kosslyn. New York, United States : John Wiley & Sons, 2015. p. 1-14.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Understanding Biological Motion

AU - van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A.

AU - Lu, Hongjing

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The ultimate goal of biological motion perception is to be able to understand actions so as to provide an answer to the question, "Who did what to whom and why?" This inference capacity enables humans to go beyond the surface appearance of behavior in order to successfully interact with others and with the environment. In addition to its functional importance, understanding biological motion bridges several major fields, including perception, reasoning, and social cognition. However, despite its paramount role in human perception and cognition, only limited progress has so far been made in understanding biological motion. After reviewing the relevant literature, this essay argues that future research needs to identify the contributions of three basic processes involved in understanding biological motion: perception of animacy, causality, and intention. The involvement of these basic processes needs to be investigated both in the typical healthy population as well as in populations with mental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. We also suggest that a productive research approach should focus on more interactive actions of the sort often observed in the natural social environment, rather than solely using the single-actor displays that have been typical in previous work. It is further emphasized that there is a need for a theoretical and computational framework within which these different types of processing can be united. We propose that the predictive coding framework provides a good candidate.

AB - The ultimate goal of biological motion perception is to be able to understand actions so as to provide an answer to the question, "Who did what to whom and why?" This inference capacity enables humans to go beyond the surface appearance of behavior in order to successfully interact with others and with the environment. In addition to its functional importance, understanding biological motion bridges several major fields, including perception, reasoning, and social cognition. However, despite its paramount role in human perception and cognition, only limited progress has so far been made in understanding biological motion. After reviewing the relevant literature, this essay argues that future research needs to identify the contributions of three basic processes involved in understanding biological motion: perception of animacy, causality, and intention. The involvement of these basic processes needs to be investigated both in the typical healthy population as well as in populations with mental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. We also suggest that a productive research approach should focus on more interactive actions of the sort often observed in the natural social environment, rather than solely using the single-actor displays that have been typical in previous work. It is further emphasized that there is a need for a theoretical and computational framework within which these different types of processing can be united. We propose that the predictive coding framework provides a good candidate.

KW - biological motion, intentions, animacy, causality, predictive coding, interaction, prediction

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/understanding-biological-motion

U2 - 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0374

DO - 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0374

M3 - Chapter

SP - 1

EP - 14

BT - Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

A2 - Pinkerton, Nancy

A2 - Scott, Robert A

A2 - Kosslyn, Stephen M

PB - John Wiley & Sons

CY - New York, United States

ER -

van Boxtel JJA, Lu H. Understanding Biological Motion. In Pinkerton N, Scott RA, Kosslyn SM, editors, Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons. 2015. p. 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0374