Understanding the Success of Presidents and Prime Ministers: The Role of Opposition Parties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines three examples of reconstructive leadership in the 1980s: Reagan in the United States, Thatcher in the United Kingdom, and Hawke in Australia. It finds three primary ways that opposition parties contribute to the success of reconstructive leaders. Firstly, oppositions contribute negatively to the success of presidents and prime ministers through ineptitude and internal division. Secondly, they assist government leaders through engagement with their ideas. Oppositions may agree with the ideas of government leaders, enhancing the leaders' ability to achieve their desired changes. On the other hand, they may disagree and potentially diminish leaders' success. When opposition parties fail to win elections it discredits their alternative ideas, often leading them to adopt government positions. This entrenches the government position, enhancing perceptions of leaders' success. Consequently, when government changes hands, new government leaders consolidate their predecessors' changes – the third way opposition parties aid reconstructive leaders. Thus, oppositions contribute to the implementation of leaders' programmes and to their legacies, two crucial elements in assessing leaders' success
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-271
Number of pages15
JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

minister
opposition
president
leader
Third Way
election
leadership
ability

Cite this

@article{6b480040065a4de1b872813a094599ac,
title = "Understanding the Success of Presidents and Prime Ministers: The Role of Opposition Parties",
abstract = "This article examines three examples of reconstructive leadership in the 1980s: Reagan in the United States, Thatcher in the United Kingdom, and Hawke in Australia. It finds three primary ways that opposition parties contribute to the success of reconstructive leaders. Firstly, oppositions contribute negatively to the success of presidents and prime ministers through ineptitude and internal division. Secondly, they assist government leaders through engagement with their ideas. Oppositions may agree with the ideas of government leaders, enhancing the leaders' ability to achieve their desired changes. On the other hand, they may disagree and potentially diminish leaders' success. When opposition parties fail to win elections it discredits their alternative ideas, often leading them to adopt government positions. This entrenches the government position, enhancing perceptions of leaders' success. Consequently, when government changes hands, new government leaders consolidate their predecessors' changes – the third way opposition parties aid reconstructive leaders. Thus, oppositions contribute to the implementation of leaders' programmes and to their legacies, two crucial elements in assessing leaders' success",
author = "Brendan McCaffrie",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/10361146.2012.677005",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "257--271",
journal = "Australian Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1036-1146",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the Success of Presidents and Prime Ministers: The Role of Opposition Parties

AU - McCaffrie, Brendan

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article examines three examples of reconstructive leadership in the 1980s: Reagan in the United States, Thatcher in the United Kingdom, and Hawke in Australia. It finds three primary ways that opposition parties contribute to the success of reconstructive leaders. Firstly, oppositions contribute negatively to the success of presidents and prime ministers through ineptitude and internal division. Secondly, they assist government leaders through engagement with their ideas. Oppositions may agree with the ideas of government leaders, enhancing the leaders' ability to achieve their desired changes. On the other hand, they may disagree and potentially diminish leaders' success. When opposition parties fail to win elections it discredits their alternative ideas, often leading them to adopt government positions. This entrenches the government position, enhancing perceptions of leaders' success. Consequently, when government changes hands, new government leaders consolidate their predecessors' changes – the third way opposition parties aid reconstructive leaders. Thus, oppositions contribute to the implementation of leaders' programmes and to their legacies, two crucial elements in assessing leaders' success

AB - This article examines three examples of reconstructive leadership in the 1980s: Reagan in the United States, Thatcher in the United Kingdom, and Hawke in Australia. It finds three primary ways that opposition parties contribute to the success of reconstructive leaders. Firstly, oppositions contribute negatively to the success of presidents and prime ministers through ineptitude and internal division. Secondly, they assist government leaders through engagement with their ideas. Oppositions may agree with the ideas of government leaders, enhancing the leaders' ability to achieve their desired changes. On the other hand, they may disagree and potentially diminish leaders' success. When opposition parties fail to win elections it discredits their alternative ideas, often leading them to adopt government positions. This entrenches the government position, enhancing perceptions of leaders' success. Consequently, when government changes hands, new government leaders consolidate their predecessors' changes – the third way opposition parties aid reconstructive leaders. Thus, oppositions contribute to the implementation of leaders' programmes and to their legacies, two crucial elements in assessing leaders' success

U2 - 10.1080/10361146.2012.677005

DO - 10.1080/10361146.2012.677005

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 257

EP - 271

JO - Australian Journal of Political Science

JF - Australian Journal of Political Science

SN - 1036-1146

IS - 2

ER -