Understanding the value and the impact of the shock

Examining the creative writing doctorate

Jen WEBB, Andrew Melrose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The creative arts disciplines are comparative newcomers to the academy, and newer yet to what is formally classed as research. However, they have been very successful in establishing research degrees and attracting students who are keen to pursue practice-led research projects. What is less well established is how we examine the results of doctoral studies in, and through, the arts. Creative writing is comparatively young as a research discipline in universities, with dedicated doctoral programmes in writing only emerging over the past decade or two. As a consequence, there is still considerable uncertainty about the quality of examination in the discipline. Questions that emerge in the limited literature on creative arts examination include: what constitutes a contribution to knowledge that is presented in the form of a creative artifact; in what ways does a creative research doctorate differ from a more conventional output; and how can we examine a creative writing doctorate in a way that accommodates the differences and preserves the integrity of the creative and critical elements of the thesis? In this paper we draw on findings from our recent research on the topic to discuss current approaches and questions of standards in the Australian and British contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-148
Number of pages15
JournalNew Writing
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Creative Arts
Creative Writing
Newcomers
Art
Uncertainty
Research Projects
Integrity
Artifact
Conventional

Cite this

@article{510e2f6048e745349d3f3e81168b95b7,
title = "Understanding the value and the impact of the shock: Examining the creative writing doctorate",
abstract = "The creative arts disciplines are comparative newcomers to the academy, and newer yet to what is formally classed as research. However, they have been very successful in establishing research degrees and attracting students who are keen to pursue practice-led research projects. What is less well established is how we examine the results of doctoral studies in, and through, the arts. Creative writing is comparatively young as a research discipline in universities, with dedicated doctoral programmes in writing only emerging over the past decade or two. As a consequence, there is still considerable uncertainty about the quality of examination in the discipline. Questions that emerge in the limited literature on creative arts examination include: what constitutes a contribution to knowledge that is presented in the form of a creative artifact; in what ways does a creative research doctorate differ from a more conventional output; and how can we examine a creative writing doctorate in a way that accommodates the differences and preserves the integrity of the creative and critical elements of the thesis? In this paper we draw on findings from our recent research on the topic to discuss current approaches and questions of standards in the Australian and British contexts.",
keywords = "creativity, doctorate, knowldedge, DCA, examination, research, knowledge",
author = "Jen WEBB and Andrew Melrose",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14790726.2013.849744",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "134--148",
journal = "New Writing",
issn = "1479-0726",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Understanding the value and the impact of the shock : Examining the creative writing doctorate. / WEBB, Jen; Melrose, Andrew.

In: New Writing, Vol. 11, No. 1, 02.01.2014, p. 134-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the value and the impact of the shock

T2 - Examining the creative writing doctorate

AU - WEBB, Jen

AU - Melrose, Andrew

PY - 2014/1/2

Y1 - 2014/1/2

N2 - The creative arts disciplines are comparative newcomers to the academy, and newer yet to what is formally classed as research. However, they have been very successful in establishing research degrees and attracting students who are keen to pursue practice-led research projects. What is less well established is how we examine the results of doctoral studies in, and through, the arts. Creative writing is comparatively young as a research discipline in universities, with dedicated doctoral programmes in writing only emerging over the past decade or two. As a consequence, there is still considerable uncertainty about the quality of examination in the discipline. Questions that emerge in the limited literature on creative arts examination include: what constitutes a contribution to knowledge that is presented in the form of a creative artifact; in what ways does a creative research doctorate differ from a more conventional output; and how can we examine a creative writing doctorate in a way that accommodates the differences and preserves the integrity of the creative and critical elements of the thesis? In this paper we draw on findings from our recent research on the topic to discuss current approaches and questions of standards in the Australian and British contexts.

AB - The creative arts disciplines are comparative newcomers to the academy, and newer yet to what is formally classed as research. However, they have been very successful in establishing research degrees and attracting students who are keen to pursue practice-led research projects. What is less well established is how we examine the results of doctoral studies in, and through, the arts. Creative writing is comparatively young as a research discipline in universities, with dedicated doctoral programmes in writing only emerging over the past decade or two. As a consequence, there is still considerable uncertainty about the quality of examination in the discipline. Questions that emerge in the limited literature on creative arts examination include: what constitutes a contribution to knowledge that is presented in the form of a creative artifact; in what ways does a creative research doctorate differ from a more conventional output; and how can we examine a creative writing doctorate in a way that accommodates the differences and preserves the integrity of the creative and critical elements of the thesis? In this paper we draw on findings from our recent research on the topic to discuss current approaches and questions of standards in the Australian and British contexts.

KW - creativity

KW - doctorate

KW - knowldedge

KW - DCA

KW - examination

KW - research

KW - knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897626126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/understanding-value-impact-shock-examining-creative-writing-doctorate

U2 - 10.1080/14790726.2013.849744

DO - 10.1080/14790726.2013.849744

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 134

EP - 148

JO - New Writing

JF - New Writing

SN - 1479-0726

IS - 1

ER -