Unpacking the RFID Investment Decision

Byron Keating, Tim Coltman, Samuel Fossa-Wamba, Valerie Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mandates aside, there are many reasons why firms decide to move forward with or delay investment in radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology. In this paper, we use a theoretically-based, easy to implement methodology to empirically derive a relative importance scale of those factors that influence the decision to invest in RFID technology. More specifically, we compare the factors that matter most and least to a sample of firms that have adopted RFID technology with a sample of firms that have yet to embrace RFID technology. The theoretical and practical implications are that both RFID adopters and nonadopters are driven by the promise of greater data accuracy, improved information visibility, service quality, process innovation, and track-and-trace capabilities. What separates the adopters from the nonadopters is an opportunity to derive strategic benefits from RFID through improved decision making. Not surprisingly, the nonadopting firms are primarily concerned with the high acquisition and other ongoing costs associated with RFID technology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1672-1680
Number of pages9
JournalInstitute of Electrical and Electronics. Proceedings
Volume98
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Radio frequency identification (RFID)
Visibility
Innovation
Decision making
Costs

Cite this

Keating, Byron ; Coltman, Tim ; Fossa-Wamba, Samuel ; Baker, Valerie. / Unpacking the RFID Investment Decision. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics. Proceedings. 2010 ; Vol. 98, No. 9. pp. 1672-1680.
@article{66c8e7dcd91848fbaa3393df722920f1,
title = "Unpacking the RFID Investment Decision",
abstract = "Mandates aside, there are many reasons why firms decide to move forward with or delay investment in radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology. In this paper, we use a theoretically-based, easy to implement methodology to empirically derive a relative importance scale of those factors that influence the decision to invest in RFID technology. More specifically, we compare the factors that matter most and least to a sample of firms that have adopted RFID technology with a sample of firms that have yet to embrace RFID technology. The theoretical and practical implications are that both RFID adopters and nonadopters are driven by the promise of greater data accuracy, improved information visibility, service quality, process innovation, and track-and-trace capabilities. What separates the adopters from the nonadopters is an opportunity to derive strategic benefits from RFID through improved decision making. Not surprisingly, the nonadopting firms are primarily concerned with the high acquisition and other ongoing costs associated with RFID technology.",
author = "Byron Keating and Tim Coltman and Samuel Fossa-Wamba and Valerie Baker",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1109/JPROC.2010.2052530",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "1672--1680",
journal = "Proceedings of the IEEE",
issn = "0018-9219",
publisher = "IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",
number = "9",

}

Keating, B, Coltman, T, Fossa-Wamba, S & Baker, V 2010, 'Unpacking the RFID Investment Decision', Institute of Electrical and Electronics. Proceedings, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 1672-1680. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2052530

Unpacking the RFID Investment Decision. / Keating, Byron; Coltman, Tim; Fossa-Wamba, Samuel; Baker, Valerie.

In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics. Proceedings, Vol. 98, No. 9, 2010, p. 1672-1680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking the RFID Investment Decision

AU - Keating, Byron

AU - Coltman, Tim

AU - Fossa-Wamba, Samuel

AU - Baker, Valerie

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Mandates aside, there are many reasons why firms decide to move forward with or delay investment in radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology. In this paper, we use a theoretically-based, easy to implement methodology to empirically derive a relative importance scale of those factors that influence the decision to invest in RFID technology. More specifically, we compare the factors that matter most and least to a sample of firms that have adopted RFID technology with a sample of firms that have yet to embrace RFID technology. The theoretical and practical implications are that both RFID adopters and nonadopters are driven by the promise of greater data accuracy, improved information visibility, service quality, process innovation, and track-and-trace capabilities. What separates the adopters from the nonadopters is an opportunity to derive strategic benefits from RFID through improved decision making. Not surprisingly, the nonadopting firms are primarily concerned with the high acquisition and other ongoing costs associated with RFID technology.

AB - Mandates aside, there are many reasons why firms decide to move forward with or delay investment in radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology. In this paper, we use a theoretically-based, easy to implement methodology to empirically derive a relative importance scale of those factors that influence the decision to invest in RFID technology. More specifically, we compare the factors that matter most and least to a sample of firms that have adopted RFID technology with a sample of firms that have yet to embrace RFID technology. The theoretical and practical implications are that both RFID adopters and nonadopters are driven by the promise of greater data accuracy, improved information visibility, service quality, process innovation, and track-and-trace capabilities. What separates the adopters from the nonadopters is an opportunity to derive strategic benefits from RFID through improved decision making. Not surprisingly, the nonadopting firms are primarily concerned with the high acquisition and other ongoing costs associated with RFID technology.

U2 - 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2052530

DO - 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2052530

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 1672

EP - 1680

JO - Proceedings of the IEEE

JF - Proceedings of the IEEE

SN - 0018-9219

IS - 9

ER -