TY - JOUR
T1 - Upper GI endoscopy in subjects with positive fecal occult blood test undergoing colonoscopy
T2 - systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Shah, Ayesha
AU - Eqbal, Ali
AU - Moy, Naomi
AU - Koloski, Natasha
AU - Messmann, Helmut
AU - Kendall, Bradley J.
AU - Sharma, Prateek
AU - Dulleck, Uwe
AU - Jones, Michael P.
AU - Holtmann, Gerald J.
N1 - Funding Information:
DISCLOSURE: The following author disclosed financial relationships: P. Sharma: Consultant for Bausch, Boston Scientific Corporation, CDx Labs, Covidien LP, Exact Sciences, Fujifilm Medical Systems USA Inc, Lucid, Lumendi, Medtronic, Phathom, Olympus, Takeda, Samsung, and Bioepis; Grant/Contract from Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Covidien, Docbot, ERBE USA Inc, Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Medtronic USA, Inc, and Olympus. G. Holtmann: Advisory boards: Australian Biotherapeutics, Glutagen, and Bayer; Research support: Bayer , Abbott , Pfizer , Janssen, Takeda , and Allergan; Board member: West Moreton Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, UQ Healthcare, Brisbane and the Gastro-Liga, Germany; Patent holder: Brisbane aseptic biopsy device; and Editor: Gastro-Liga Newsletter. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships. Funding was provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council ( APP1084544 ), Centre for Research Excellence (APP170993).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background and Aims: The role of gastroscopy to investigate the upper GI (UGI) tract in subjects with a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT+) result is controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, which aimed to determine the prevalence of UGI lesions in FOBT+ subjects. Methods: Databases were searched until March 31, 2022 for studies reporting UGI lesions in FOBT+ subjects undergoing colonoscopy and gastroscopy. Pooled prevalence rates of UGI cancers and clinically significant lesions (CSLs; lesions potentially explaining occult blood loss), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: We included 21 studies with 6993 FOBT+ subjects. Pooled prevalence of UGI cancers was .8% (95% CI, .4-1.6) and UGI CSLs was 30.4% (95% CI, 20.7-42.2), and that of colonic cancers and CSLs was 3.3% (95% CI, 1.8-6.0) and 31.9% (95% CI, 23.9-41.1), respectively. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of UGI CSL and UGI cancers in FOBT+ subjects with/without colonic pathology (ORs of 1.2 [95% CI, .9-1.6; P = .137] and 1.6 [95% CI, .5-5.5; P = .460]). Anemia in FOBT+ subjects was associated with UGI cancers (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.3-31.5; P = .025) and UGI CSLs (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.2-8.4; P = .0001). GI symptoms were not associated with UGI CSLs (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, .6-2.8; P = .511). Conclusions: There is an appreciable prevalence of UGI cancers and other CSLs in FOBT+ subjects. Anemia but not symptoms or colonic pathology are linked to UGI lesions. Although the data suggest that same-day gastroscopy in FOBT+ subjects undergoing colonoscopy yields approximately 25% more malignancies as colonoscopy alone, prospective data are required to determine the cost-efficacy of dual endoscopy as a standard of care for all FOBT+ subjects.
AB - Background and Aims: The role of gastroscopy to investigate the upper GI (UGI) tract in subjects with a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT+) result is controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, which aimed to determine the prevalence of UGI lesions in FOBT+ subjects. Methods: Databases were searched until March 31, 2022 for studies reporting UGI lesions in FOBT+ subjects undergoing colonoscopy and gastroscopy. Pooled prevalence rates of UGI cancers and clinically significant lesions (CSLs; lesions potentially explaining occult blood loss), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: We included 21 studies with 6993 FOBT+ subjects. Pooled prevalence of UGI cancers was .8% (95% CI, .4-1.6) and UGI CSLs was 30.4% (95% CI, 20.7-42.2), and that of colonic cancers and CSLs was 3.3% (95% CI, 1.8-6.0) and 31.9% (95% CI, 23.9-41.1), respectively. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of UGI CSL and UGI cancers in FOBT+ subjects with/without colonic pathology (ORs of 1.2 [95% CI, .9-1.6; P = .137] and 1.6 [95% CI, .5-5.5; P = .460]). Anemia in FOBT+ subjects was associated with UGI cancers (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.3-31.5; P = .025) and UGI CSLs (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.2-8.4; P = .0001). GI symptoms were not associated with UGI CSLs (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, .6-2.8; P = .511). Conclusions: There is an appreciable prevalence of UGI cancers and other CSLs in FOBT+ subjects. Anemia but not symptoms or colonic pathology are linked to UGI lesions. Although the data suggest that same-day gastroscopy in FOBT+ subjects undergoing colonoscopy yields approximately 25% more malignancies as colonoscopy alone, prospective data are required to determine the cost-efficacy of dual endoscopy as a standard of care for all FOBT+ subjects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159217171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.013
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.013
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36812947
AN - SCOPUS:85159217171
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 97
SP - 1
EP - 41
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -