Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA

Kirsty Maunder, Karen Walton, Peter WILLIAMS, Maree Ferguson, Eleanor Beck, E Ayres, L Hoggle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To determine the method and extent of health information technology (HIT) utilisation, roles in relation to HIT in the workplace and perceived barriers and benefits of HIT by dietitians in Australia and provide a comparison with dietitians in the USA. Methods: A survey adapted from the 2011 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) was utilised and circulated electronically to Dietitians Association of Australia members and advertised through a professional nutrition website in 2013. The survey encompassed 25 questions on computer access and use, data sources, experience using HIT, organisational involvement and perceived barriers and benefits to HIT. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, chi-square tests and z-tests were computed to investigate and compare responses from the 2013 Australian and 2011 Academy surveys. Results: The survey completion rate represented 14.5% of Dietitians Association of Australia members (747) and 5% of Academy members (3342). The Australian and Academy respondents reported similar high levels of comfort using technology, awareness of workplace HIT benefits (such as enhanced time management and improved ability to access data) and low levels of organisational involvement. However, there were a significantly greater number of Academy organisations utilising electronic health records (P <0.05), and significantly more Academy respondents (55%) reported 'no barriers' to using HIT compared with Australians (37%) (P <0.05). Conclusions: Educational programmes will be central to ensuring dietitians are equipped with technology and information management skills required to be involved in and make informed decisions about dietetic-related HIT projects as these will soon be fundamental to dietetic practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-298
Number of pages8
JournalNutrition and Dietetics
Volume72
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Medical Informatics
Informatics
Nutritionists
Dietetics
Workplace
Technology
Time Management
Information Management
Aptitude
Electronic Health Records
Information Storage and Retrieval
Chi-Square Distribution
Surveys and Questionnaires
Organizations

Cite this

Maunder, K., Walton, K., WILLIAMS, P., Ferguson, M., Beck, E., Ayres, E., & Hoggle, L. (2015). Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA. Nutrition and Dietetics, 72(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12207
Maunder, Kirsty ; Walton, Karen ; WILLIAMS, Peter ; Ferguson, Maree ; Beck, Eleanor ; Ayres, E ; Hoggle, L. / Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA. In: Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015 ; Vol. 72, No. 3. pp. 291-298.
@article{eb6f44e5dfe14648960a6486edc0d1c0,
title = "Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA",
abstract = "Aim: To determine the method and extent of health information technology (HIT) utilisation, roles in relation to HIT in the workplace and perceived barriers and benefits of HIT by dietitians in Australia and provide a comparison with dietitians in the USA. Methods: A survey adapted from the 2011 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) was utilised and circulated electronically to Dietitians Association of Australia members and advertised through a professional nutrition website in 2013. The survey encompassed 25 questions on computer access and use, data sources, experience using HIT, organisational involvement and perceived barriers and benefits to HIT. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, chi-square tests and z-tests were computed to investigate and compare responses from the 2013 Australian and 2011 Academy surveys. Results: The survey completion rate represented 14.5{\%} of Dietitians Association of Australia members (747) and 5{\%} of Academy members (3342). The Australian and Academy respondents reported similar high levels of comfort using technology, awareness of workplace HIT benefits (such as enhanced time management and improved ability to access data) and low levels of organisational involvement. However, there were a significantly greater number of Academy organisations utilising electronic health records (P <0.05), and significantly more Academy respondents (55{\%}) reported 'no barriers' to using HIT compared with Australians (37{\%}) (P <0.05). Conclusions: Educational programmes will be central to ensuring dietitians are equipped with technology and information management skills required to be involved in and make informed decisions about dietetic-related HIT projects as these will soon be fundamental to dietetic practice.",
author = "Kirsty Maunder and Karen Walton and Peter WILLIAMS and Maree Ferguson and Eleanor Beck and E Ayres and L Hoggle",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/1747-0080.12207",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "291--298",
journal = "Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "1032-1322",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Maunder, K, Walton, K, WILLIAMS, P, Ferguson, M, Beck, E, Ayres, E & Hoggle, L 2015, 'Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA', Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12207

Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA. / Maunder, Kirsty; Walton, Karen; WILLIAMS, Peter; Ferguson, Maree; Beck, Eleanor; Ayres, E; Hoggle, L.

In: Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2015, p. 291-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA

AU - Maunder, Kirsty

AU - Walton, Karen

AU - WILLIAMS, Peter

AU - Ferguson, Maree

AU - Beck, Eleanor

AU - Ayres, E

AU - Hoggle, L

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Aim: To determine the method and extent of health information technology (HIT) utilisation, roles in relation to HIT in the workplace and perceived barriers and benefits of HIT by dietitians in Australia and provide a comparison with dietitians in the USA. Methods: A survey adapted from the 2011 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) was utilised and circulated electronically to Dietitians Association of Australia members and advertised through a professional nutrition website in 2013. The survey encompassed 25 questions on computer access and use, data sources, experience using HIT, organisational involvement and perceived barriers and benefits to HIT. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, chi-square tests and z-tests were computed to investigate and compare responses from the 2013 Australian and 2011 Academy surveys. Results: The survey completion rate represented 14.5% of Dietitians Association of Australia members (747) and 5% of Academy members (3342). The Australian and Academy respondents reported similar high levels of comfort using technology, awareness of workplace HIT benefits (such as enhanced time management and improved ability to access data) and low levels of organisational involvement. However, there were a significantly greater number of Academy organisations utilising electronic health records (P <0.05), and significantly more Academy respondents (55%) reported 'no barriers' to using HIT compared with Australians (37%) (P <0.05). Conclusions: Educational programmes will be central to ensuring dietitians are equipped with technology and information management skills required to be involved in and make informed decisions about dietetic-related HIT projects as these will soon be fundamental to dietetic practice.

AB - Aim: To determine the method and extent of health information technology (HIT) utilisation, roles in relation to HIT in the workplace and perceived barriers and benefits of HIT by dietitians in Australia and provide a comparison with dietitians in the USA. Methods: A survey adapted from the 2011 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) was utilised and circulated electronically to Dietitians Association of Australia members and advertised through a professional nutrition website in 2013. The survey encompassed 25 questions on computer access and use, data sources, experience using HIT, organisational involvement and perceived barriers and benefits to HIT. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, chi-square tests and z-tests were computed to investigate and compare responses from the 2013 Australian and 2011 Academy surveys. Results: The survey completion rate represented 14.5% of Dietitians Association of Australia members (747) and 5% of Academy members (3342). The Australian and Academy respondents reported similar high levels of comfort using technology, awareness of workplace HIT benefits (such as enhanced time management and improved ability to access data) and low levels of organisational involvement. However, there were a significantly greater number of Academy organisations utilising electronic health records (P <0.05), and significantly more Academy respondents (55%) reported 'no barriers' to using HIT compared with Australians (37%) (P <0.05). Conclusions: Educational programmes will be central to ensuring dietitians are equipped with technology and information management skills required to be involved in and make informed decisions about dietetic-related HIT projects as these will soon be fundamental to dietetic practice.

U2 - 10.1111/1747-0080.12207

DO - 10.1111/1747-0080.12207

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 291

EP - 298

JO - Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 1032-1322

IS - 3

ER -

Maunder K, Walton K, WILLIAMS P, Ferguson M, Beck E, Ayres E et al. Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA. Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015;72(3):291-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12207