TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of artificial intelligence in discerning the need for prostate biopsy and readiness for clinical practice
T2 - a systematic review protocol
AU - Martinez-Marroquin, Elisa
AU - Chau, Minh
AU - Turner, Murray
AU - Haxhimolla, Hodo
AU - Paterson, Catherine
N1 - Funding Information:
This research has not received specific funding from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit organisations. The work has been supported internally by the Faculty of Science and Technology and the Faculty of Health of the University of Canberra.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/7/17
Y1 - 2023/7/17
N2 - Background: Variability and inaccuracies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, and the risk of complications from invasive tests, have been extensively reported in the research literature. To address this, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been attracting increased interest in recent years to improve the diagnostic accuracy and objectivity. Although AI literature has reported promising results, further research is needed on the identification of evidence gaps that limit the potential adoption in prostate cancer screening practice. Methods: A systematic electronic search strategy will be used to identify peer-reviewed articles published from inception to the date of searches and indexed in CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Registries including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) will be searched for unpublished studies, and experts were invited to provide suitable references. The research and reporting will be based on Cochrane recommendations and PRISMA guidelines, respectively. The screening and quality assessment of the articles will be conducted by two of the authors independently, and conflicts will be resolved by a third author. Discussion: This systematic review will summarise the use of AI techniques to predict the need for prostate biopsy based on clinical and demographic indicators, including its diagnostic accuracy and readiness for adoption in clinical practice.
AB - Background: Variability and inaccuracies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, and the risk of complications from invasive tests, have been extensively reported in the research literature. To address this, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been attracting increased interest in recent years to improve the diagnostic accuracy and objectivity. Although AI literature has reported promising results, further research is needed on the identification of evidence gaps that limit the potential adoption in prostate cancer screening practice. Methods: A systematic electronic search strategy will be used to identify peer-reviewed articles published from inception to the date of searches and indexed in CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Registries including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) will be searched for unpublished studies, and experts were invited to provide suitable references. The research and reporting will be based on Cochrane recommendations and PRISMA guidelines, respectively. The screening and quality assessment of the articles will be conducted by two of the authors independently, and conflicts will be resolved by a third author. Discussion: This systematic review will summarise the use of AI techniques to predict the need for prostate biopsy based on clinical and demographic indicators, including its diagnostic accuracy and readiness for adoption in clinical practice.
KW - AI adoption readiness
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Diagnostic pathway
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Systematic review protocol
KW - Technology maturity level
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164981339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13643-023-02282-6
DO - 10.1186/s13643-023-02282-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 37461083
AN - SCOPUS:85164981339
SN - 2046-4053
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Systematic Reviews
JF - Systematic Reviews
IS - 1
M1 - 126
ER -