Use of the abundance spectrum and relative-abundance distributions to analyze assemblage change in massively altered landscapes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    45 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Fragmentation of natural landscapes is a pervasive process in the world. Common models predict coherent change in assemblages, with less numerous species becoming locally extinct first, then species of intermediate abundance, and so forth. Relative-abundance distributions should change systematically in landscapes characterized by greater change. Such a predictable sequence of change is not evident in the avifaunas of landscapes of central Victoria, Australia, where relative-abundance patterns in more affected landscapes bear little resemblance to reference distributions. I provide two sets of analyses of relative-abundance distributions: (1) analyses that do not depend on the identity of individual species and (2) abundance spectra, which use ordered lists of species ranked by species' commonness in reference systems. While abundance spectra change dramatically in smaller remnants, relative-abundance distributions change little, suggesting that the "reorganization" of abundances occurs over ecological time frames. The dispersal-limited multinomial is a flexible distribution that may fit many data sets yet be unrelated to assumptions (species neutrality) and processes (fixed total numbers of individuals) of the unified neutral theory. A more complete understanding of human impacts at landscape scales must include capacities to predict those species that will be advantaged by change, as well as those that will be disadvantaged. © 2007 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)319-330
    Number of pages12
    JournalAmerican Naturalist
    Volume170
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    relative abundance
    Victoria (Australia)
    anthropogenic activities
    distribution
    anthropogenic effect
    fragmentation

    Cite this

    @article{ff04b13969db40a0bbfe950b29a882fe,
    title = "Use of the abundance spectrum and relative-abundance distributions to analyze assemblage change in massively altered landscapes",
    abstract = "Fragmentation of natural landscapes is a pervasive process in the world. Common models predict coherent change in assemblages, with less numerous species becoming locally extinct first, then species of intermediate abundance, and so forth. Relative-abundance distributions should change systematically in landscapes characterized by greater change. Such a predictable sequence of change is not evident in the avifaunas of landscapes of central Victoria, Australia, where relative-abundance patterns in more affected landscapes bear little resemblance to reference distributions. I provide two sets of analyses of relative-abundance distributions: (1) analyses that do not depend on the identity of individual species and (2) abundance spectra, which use ordered lists of species ranked by species' commonness in reference systems. While abundance spectra change dramatically in smaller remnants, relative-abundance distributions change little, suggesting that the {"}reorganization{"} of abundances occurs over ecological time frames. The dispersal-limited multinomial is a flexible distribution that may fit many data sets yet be unrelated to assumptions (species neutrality) and processes (fixed total numbers of individuals) of the unified neutral theory. A more complete understanding of human impacts at landscape scales must include capacities to predict those species that will be advantaged by change, as well as those that will be disadvantaged. {\circledC} 2007 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.",
    author = "{Mac Nally}, R.",
    note = "Cited By :42 Export Date: 6 June 2017",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1086/519859",
    language = "English",
    volume = "170",
    pages = "319--330",
    journal = "American Naturalist",
    issn = "0003-0147",
    publisher = "University of Chicago",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Use of the abundance spectrum and relative-abundance distributions to analyze assemblage change in massively altered landscapes

    AU - Mac Nally, R.

    N1 - Cited By :42 Export Date: 6 June 2017

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Fragmentation of natural landscapes is a pervasive process in the world. Common models predict coherent change in assemblages, with less numerous species becoming locally extinct first, then species of intermediate abundance, and so forth. Relative-abundance distributions should change systematically in landscapes characterized by greater change. Such a predictable sequence of change is not evident in the avifaunas of landscapes of central Victoria, Australia, where relative-abundance patterns in more affected landscapes bear little resemblance to reference distributions. I provide two sets of analyses of relative-abundance distributions: (1) analyses that do not depend on the identity of individual species and (2) abundance spectra, which use ordered lists of species ranked by species' commonness in reference systems. While abundance spectra change dramatically in smaller remnants, relative-abundance distributions change little, suggesting that the "reorganization" of abundances occurs over ecological time frames. The dispersal-limited multinomial is a flexible distribution that may fit many data sets yet be unrelated to assumptions (species neutrality) and processes (fixed total numbers of individuals) of the unified neutral theory. A more complete understanding of human impacts at landscape scales must include capacities to predict those species that will be advantaged by change, as well as those that will be disadvantaged. © 2007 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

    AB - Fragmentation of natural landscapes is a pervasive process in the world. Common models predict coherent change in assemblages, with less numerous species becoming locally extinct first, then species of intermediate abundance, and so forth. Relative-abundance distributions should change systematically in landscapes characterized by greater change. Such a predictable sequence of change is not evident in the avifaunas of landscapes of central Victoria, Australia, where relative-abundance patterns in more affected landscapes bear little resemblance to reference distributions. I provide two sets of analyses of relative-abundance distributions: (1) analyses that do not depend on the identity of individual species and (2) abundance spectra, which use ordered lists of species ranked by species' commonness in reference systems. While abundance spectra change dramatically in smaller remnants, relative-abundance distributions change little, suggesting that the "reorganization" of abundances occurs over ecological time frames. The dispersal-limited multinomial is a flexible distribution that may fit many data sets yet be unrelated to assumptions (species neutrality) and processes (fixed total numbers of individuals) of the unified neutral theory. A more complete understanding of human impacts at landscape scales must include capacities to predict those species that will be advantaged by change, as well as those that will be disadvantaged. © 2007 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

    U2 - 10.1086/519859

    DO - 10.1086/519859

    M3 - Article

    VL - 170

    SP - 319

    EP - 330

    JO - American Naturalist

    JF - American Naturalist

    SN - 0003-0147

    IS - 3

    ER -