TY - JOUR
T1 - Using accountability for mental health to drive reform summary
AU - Rosenberg, Sebastian P.
AU - Hickie, Ian B.
AU - McGorry, Patrick D.
AU - Salvador-Carulla, Luis
AU - Burns, Jane
AU - Christensen, Helen
AU - Mendoza, John
AU - Rosen, Alan
AU - Russell, Lesley M.
AU - Sinclair, Sally
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 AMPCo Pty Ltd. Produced with Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/10
Y1 - 2015/10
N2 - Greatly enhanced accountability can drive mental health reform. As extant approaches are ineffective, we propose a new approach. Australia spends around $7.6 billion on mental health services annually, but is anybody getting better? Effective accountability for mental health can reduce variation in care and increase effective service provision. Despite 20 years of rhetoric, Australia’s approach to accountability in mental health is overly focused on fulfilling governmental reporting requirements rather than using data to drive reform. The existing system is both fragmented and outcome blind. Australia has failed to develop useful local and regional approaches to benchmarking in mental health. New approaches must address this gap and better reflect the experience of care felt by consumers and carers, as well as by service providers. There are important social priorities in mental health that must be assessed. We provide a brief overview of the existing system and propose a new, modest but achievable set of indicators by which to monitor the progress of national mental health reform. These indicators should form part of a new, systemwide process of continuous quality improvement in mental health care and suicide prevention.
AB - Greatly enhanced accountability can drive mental health reform. As extant approaches are ineffective, we propose a new approach. Australia spends around $7.6 billion on mental health services annually, but is anybody getting better? Effective accountability for mental health can reduce variation in care and increase effective service provision. Despite 20 years of rhetoric, Australia’s approach to accountability in mental health is overly focused on fulfilling governmental reporting requirements rather than using data to drive reform. The existing system is both fragmented and outcome blind. Australia has failed to develop useful local and regional approaches to benchmarking in mental health. New approaches must address this gap and better reflect the experience of care felt by consumers and carers, as well as by service providers. There are important social priorities in mental health that must be assessed. We provide a brief overview of the existing system and propose a new, modest but achievable set of indicators by which to monitor the progress of national mental health reform. These indicators should form part of a new, systemwide process of continuous quality improvement in mental health care and suicide prevention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945174144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5694/mja15.00447
DO - 10.5694/mja15.00447
M3 - Other Journal Article
C2 - 26465695
AN - SCOPUS:84945174144
SN - 0025-729X
VL - 203
SP - 328
EP - 330
JO - Medical Journal of Australia
JF - Medical Journal of Australia
IS - 8
ER -