Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups

Erica Fleishman, J.R. Thomson, R. Mac Nally, Danielle Murphy, J.P. Fay

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    71 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Values of species richness are used widely to establish conservation and management priorities. Because inventory data, money, and time are limited, use of surrogates such as “indicator” species to estimate species richness has become common. Identifying sets of indicator species that might reliably predict species richness, especially across taxonomic groups, remains a considerable challenge. We used genetic algorithms and a Bayesian approach to explain individual and combined species richness of two taxonomic groups as a function of occurrence patterns of indicator species drawn from either both groups or one group. Genetic algorithms iteratively screen large numbers of potential models and predictor variables in a process that emulates natural selection. The best-fitting models of bird species richness and butterfly species richness explained approximately 80% of deviances and included only indicator species from the same taxonomic group. Using species from both taxonomic groups as potential predictors did not improve model fit but slightly improved the parsimony (fewer predictors) of the model of bird species richness. The best model of combined species richness included five butterflies and one bird and explained 83% of deviance, whereas a model of combined species richness based on six butterflies as indicators explained 82% of deviance. A model of combined species richness based on birds alone explained 72% of deviance. We found that a small, common set of species could be used to predict separately the species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. We built models explaining approximately 70% of the deviance in species richness of birds and butterflies based on a common set of three bird species and three butterfly species. We also identified a set of six species of butterflies that predicted ≥66% of both bird species richness and butterfly species richness. Our approach is applicable to any assemblage or ecosystem, and may be useful both for estimating species richness and for gaining insight into mechanisms that influence diversity patterns.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1125-1137
    Number of pages13
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    indicator species
    species richness
    species diversity
    butterfly
    butterflies
    birds
    indicator
    bird
    genetic algorithm
    natural selection

    Cite this

    Fleishman, Erica ; Thomson, J.R. ; Mac Nally, R. ; Murphy, Danielle ; Fay, J.P. / Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. In: Conservation Biology. 2005 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 1125-1137.
    @article{1d86a3e6d1204095ad22711c295b0bb0,
    title = "Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups",
    abstract = "Values of species richness are used widely to establish conservation and management priorities. Because inventory data, money, and time are limited, use of surrogates such as “indicator” species to estimate species richness has become common. Identifying sets of indicator species that might reliably predict species richness, especially across taxonomic groups, remains a considerable challenge. We used genetic algorithms and a Bayesian approach to explain individual and combined species richness of two taxonomic groups as a function of occurrence patterns of indicator species drawn from either both groups or one group. Genetic algorithms iteratively screen large numbers of potential models and predictor variables in a process that emulates natural selection. The best-fitting models of bird species richness and butterfly species richness explained approximately 80{\%} of deviances and included only indicator species from the same taxonomic group. Using species from both taxonomic groups as potential predictors did not improve model fit but slightly improved the parsimony (fewer predictors) of the model of bird species richness. The best model of combined species richness included five butterflies and one bird and explained 83{\%} of deviance, whereas a model of combined species richness based on six butterflies as indicators explained 82{\%} of deviance. A model of combined species richness based on birds alone explained 72{\%} of deviance. We found that a small, common set of species could be used to predict separately the species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. We built models explaining approximately 70{\%} of the deviance in species richness of birds and butterflies based on a common set of three bird species and three butterfly species. We also identified a set of six species of butterflies that predicted ≥66{\%} of both bird species richness and butterfly species richness. Our approach is applicable to any assemblage or ecosystem, and may be useful both for estimating species richness and for gaining insight into mechanisms that influence diversity patterns.",
    author = "Erica Fleishman and J.R. Thomson and {Mac Nally}, R. and Danielle Murphy and J.P. Fay",
    note = "Cited By :63 Export Date: 6 June 2017",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00168.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "1125--1137",
    journal = "Conservation Biology",
    issn = "0888-8892",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. / Fleishman, Erica; Thomson, J.R.; Mac Nally, R.; Murphy, Danielle; Fay, J.P.

    In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005, p. 1125-1137.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups

    AU - Fleishman, Erica

    AU - Thomson, J.R.

    AU - Mac Nally, R.

    AU - Murphy, Danielle

    AU - Fay, J.P.

    N1 - Cited By :63 Export Date: 6 June 2017

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Values of species richness are used widely to establish conservation and management priorities. Because inventory data, money, and time are limited, use of surrogates such as “indicator” species to estimate species richness has become common. Identifying sets of indicator species that might reliably predict species richness, especially across taxonomic groups, remains a considerable challenge. We used genetic algorithms and a Bayesian approach to explain individual and combined species richness of two taxonomic groups as a function of occurrence patterns of indicator species drawn from either both groups or one group. Genetic algorithms iteratively screen large numbers of potential models and predictor variables in a process that emulates natural selection. The best-fitting models of bird species richness and butterfly species richness explained approximately 80% of deviances and included only indicator species from the same taxonomic group. Using species from both taxonomic groups as potential predictors did not improve model fit but slightly improved the parsimony (fewer predictors) of the model of bird species richness. The best model of combined species richness included five butterflies and one bird and explained 83% of deviance, whereas a model of combined species richness based on six butterflies as indicators explained 82% of deviance. A model of combined species richness based on birds alone explained 72% of deviance. We found that a small, common set of species could be used to predict separately the species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. We built models explaining approximately 70% of the deviance in species richness of birds and butterflies based on a common set of three bird species and three butterfly species. We also identified a set of six species of butterflies that predicted ≥66% of both bird species richness and butterfly species richness. Our approach is applicable to any assemblage or ecosystem, and may be useful both for estimating species richness and for gaining insight into mechanisms that influence diversity patterns.

    AB - Values of species richness are used widely to establish conservation and management priorities. Because inventory data, money, and time are limited, use of surrogates such as “indicator” species to estimate species richness has become common. Identifying sets of indicator species that might reliably predict species richness, especially across taxonomic groups, remains a considerable challenge. We used genetic algorithms and a Bayesian approach to explain individual and combined species richness of two taxonomic groups as a function of occurrence patterns of indicator species drawn from either both groups or one group. Genetic algorithms iteratively screen large numbers of potential models and predictor variables in a process that emulates natural selection. The best-fitting models of bird species richness and butterfly species richness explained approximately 80% of deviances and included only indicator species from the same taxonomic group. Using species from both taxonomic groups as potential predictors did not improve model fit but slightly improved the parsimony (fewer predictors) of the model of bird species richness. The best model of combined species richness included five butterflies and one bird and explained 83% of deviance, whereas a model of combined species richness based on six butterflies as indicators explained 82% of deviance. A model of combined species richness based on birds alone explained 72% of deviance. We found that a small, common set of species could be used to predict separately the species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. We built models explaining approximately 70% of the deviance in species richness of birds and butterflies based on a common set of three bird species and three butterfly species. We also identified a set of six species of butterflies that predicted ≥66% of both bird species richness and butterfly species richness. Our approach is applicable to any assemblage or ecosystem, and may be useful both for estimating species richness and for gaining insight into mechanisms that influence diversity patterns.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00168.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00168.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 19

    SP - 1125

    EP - 1137

    JO - Conservation Biology

    JF - Conservation Biology

    SN - 0888-8892

    IS - 4

    ER -