Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology

a survey of Australian medical oncologists

Timothy H.M. To, Wee Kheng Soo, Heather Lane, Adnan Khattak, Christopher Steer, Bianca Devitt, Haryana M. Dhillon, Anne Booms, Jane Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional health assessment of the older person to evaluate their physical and cognitive function, comorbidities, nutrition, medications, psychological state, and social supports. GA may help oncologists optimise care for older patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the views of Australian medical oncologists regarding the incorporation of geriatric screening tools, GA and collaboration with geriatricians into routine clinical practice. Methods: Members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia were invited to complete an online survey that evaluated respondent demographics, practice characteristics, treatment decision-making factors, use of GA, and access to geriatricians. Results: Sixty-nine respondents identified comorbidities, polypharmacy, and poor functional status as the most frequent challenges in caring for older patients with cancer. Physical function, social supports and nutrition were the most frequent factors influencing treatment decision-making. The majority of respondents perceived value in GA and geriatrician review, although access was a barrier for referral. Such services would need to be responsive, providing reports within two weeks for the majority of respondents. Conclusion: Despite an emerging evidence base for the potential benefits of GA and collaboration with geriatricians, medical oncologists reported a lack of access but a desire to engage with these services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-221
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Geriatric Oncology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Geriatric Assessment
Social Support
Comorbidity
Decision Making
Polypharmacy
Geriatrics
Cognition
Surveys and Questionnaires
Oncologists
Neoplasms
Patient Care
Referral and Consultation
Demography
Psychology
Geriatricians
Health
Therapeutics

Cite this

To, T. H. M., Soo, W. K., Lane, H., Khattak, A., Steer, C., Devitt, B., ... Phillips, J. (2019). Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology: a survey of Australian medical oncologists. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 10(2), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004
To, Timothy H.M. ; Soo, Wee Kheng ; Lane, Heather ; Khattak, Adnan ; Steer, Christopher ; Devitt, Bianca ; Dhillon, Haryana M. ; Booms, Anne ; Phillips, Jane. / Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology : a survey of Australian medical oncologists. In: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 216-221.
@article{4194233eb92f440aba7247fe21165fbe,
title = "Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology: a survey of Australian medical oncologists",
abstract = "Introduction: Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional health assessment of the older person to evaluate their physical and cognitive function, comorbidities, nutrition, medications, psychological state, and social supports. GA may help oncologists optimise care for older patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the views of Australian medical oncologists regarding the incorporation of geriatric screening tools, GA and collaboration with geriatricians into routine clinical practice. Methods: Members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia were invited to complete an online survey that evaluated respondent demographics, practice characteristics, treatment decision-making factors, use of GA, and access to geriatricians. Results: Sixty-nine respondents identified comorbidities, polypharmacy, and poor functional status as the most frequent challenges in caring for older patients with cancer. Physical function, social supports and nutrition were the most frequent factors influencing treatment decision-making. The majority of respondents perceived value in GA and geriatrician review, although access was a barrier for referral. Such services would need to be responsive, providing reports within two weeks for the majority of respondents. Conclusion: Despite an emerging evidence base for the potential benefits of GA and collaboration with geriatricians, medical oncologists reported a lack of access but a desire to engage with these services.",
keywords = "Frailty, Geriatric assessment, Medical oncology, Survey",
author = "To, {Timothy H.M.} and Soo, {Wee Kheng} and Heather Lane and Adnan Khattak and Christopher Steer and Bianca Devitt and Dhillon, {Haryana M.} and Anne Booms and Jane Phillips",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "216--221",
journal = "Journal of Geriatric Oncology",
issn = "1879-4068",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

To, THM, Soo, WK, Lane, H, Khattak, A, Steer, C, Devitt, B, Dhillon, HM, Booms, A & Phillips, J 2019, 'Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology: a survey of Australian medical oncologists', Journal of Geriatric Oncology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 216-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004

Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology : a survey of Australian medical oncologists. / To, Timothy H.M.; Soo, Wee Kheng; Lane, Heather; Khattak, Adnan; Steer, Christopher; Devitt, Bianca; Dhillon, Haryana M.; Booms, Anne; Phillips, Jane.

In: Journal of Geriatric Oncology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 216-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology

T2 - a survey of Australian medical oncologists

AU - To, Timothy H.M.

AU - Soo, Wee Kheng

AU - Lane, Heather

AU - Khattak, Adnan

AU - Steer, Christopher

AU - Devitt, Bianca

AU - Dhillon, Haryana M.

AU - Booms, Anne

AU - Phillips, Jane

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Introduction: Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional health assessment of the older person to evaluate their physical and cognitive function, comorbidities, nutrition, medications, psychological state, and social supports. GA may help oncologists optimise care for older patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the views of Australian medical oncologists regarding the incorporation of geriatric screening tools, GA and collaboration with geriatricians into routine clinical practice. Methods: Members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia were invited to complete an online survey that evaluated respondent demographics, practice characteristics, treatment decision-making factors, use of GA, and access to geriatricians. Results: Sixty-nine respondents identified comorbidities, polypharmacy, and poor functional status as the most frequent challenges in caring for older patients with cancer. Physical function, social supports and nutrition were the most frequent factors influencing treatment decision-making. The majority of respondents perceived value in GA and geriatrician review, although access was a barrier for referral. Such services would need to be responsive, providing reports within two weeks for the majority of respondents. Conclusion: Despite an emerging evidence base for the potential benefits of GA and collaboration with geriatricians, medical oncologists reported a lack of access but a desire to engage with these services.

AB - Introduction: Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional health assessment of the older person to evaluate their physical and cognitive function, comorbidities, nutrition, medications, psychological state, and social supports. GA may help oncologists optimise care for older patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the views of Australian medical oncologists regarding the incorporation of geriatric screening tools, GA and collaboration with geriatricians into routine clinical practice. Methods: Members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia were invited to complete an online survey that evaluated respondent demographics, practice characteristics, treatment decision-making factors, use of GA, and access to geriatricians. Results: Sixty-nine respondents identified comorbidities, polypharmacy, and poor functional status as the most frequent challenges in caring for older patients with cancer. Physical function, social supports and nutrition were the most frequent factors influencing treatment decision-making. The majority of respondents perceived value in GA and geriatrician review, although access was a barrier for referral. Such services would need to be responsive, providing reports within two weeks for the majority of respondents. Conclusion: Despite an emerging evidence base for the potential benefits of GA and collaboration with geriatricians, medical oncologists reported a lack of access but a desire to engage with these services.

KW - Frailty

KW - Geriatric assessment

KW - Medical oncology

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050166292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 216

EP - 221

JO - Journal of Geriatric Oncology

JF - Journal of Geriatric Oncology

SN - 1879-4068

IS - 2

ER -