TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology
T2 - a survey of Australian medical oncologists
AU - To, Timothy H.M.
AU - Soo, Wee Kheng
AU - Lane, Heather
AU - Khattak, Adnan
AU - Steer, Christopher
AU - Devitt, Bianca
AU - Dhillon, Haryana M.
AU - Booms, Anne
AU - Phillips, Jane
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank all those who participated in the survey, the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) for their support and the guidance of the COSA Geriatric Oncology group. The authors report no external sources of funding for this study. C Steer reports personal fees from MSD, Roche and Janssen outside the submitted work, and is a member of the editorial board for the Journal of Geriatric Oncology. The other authors had no conflicts of interests to disclose. Study Concepts: T To, W Soo, H Lane, A Khattak, B Devitt, C Steer, J Phillips. Study Design: T To, W Soo, H Lane, A Khattak, B Devitt, C Steer, J Phillips. Data Acquisition: T To, C Steer, J Phillips. Quality Control of Data and Algorithms: T To. Data Analysis and Interpretation: T To, W Soo, H Lane. Statistical Analysis: T To. Manuscript Preparation: T To, W Soo, H Lane, A Khattak. Manuscript Editing: T To, W Soo, H Lane, A Khattak, B Devitt, H Dhillon, A Booms, J Phillips. Manuscript Review: T To, W Soo, H Lane, A Khattak, B Devitt, H Dhillon, A Booms, J Phillips.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Introduction: Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional health assessment of the older person to evaluate their physical and cognitive function, comorbidities, nutrition, medications, psychological state, and social supports. GA may help oncologists optimise care for older patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the views of Australian medical oncologists regarding the incorporation of geriatric screening tools, GA and collaboration with geriatricians into routine clinical practice. Methods: Members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia were invited to complete an online survey that evaluated respondent demographics, practice characteristics, treatment decision-making factors, use of GA, and access to geriatricians. Results: Sixty-nine respondents identified comorbidities, polypharmacy, and poor functional status as the most frequent challenges in caring for older patients with cancer. Physical function, social supports and nutrition were the most frequent factors influencing treatment decision-making. The majority of respondents perceived value in GA and geriatrician review, although access was a barrier for referral. Such services would need to be responsive, providing reports within two weeks for the majority of respondents. Conclusion: Despite an emerging evidence base for the potential benefits of GA and collaboration with geriatricians, medical oncologists reported a lack of access but a desire to engage with these services.
AB - Introduction: Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional health assessment of the older person to evaluate their physical and cognitive function, comorbidities, nutrition, medications, psychological state, and social supports. GA may help oncologists optimise care for older patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the views of Australian medical oncologists regarding the incorporation of geriatric screening tools, GA and collaboration with geriatricians into routine clinical practice. Methods: Members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia were invited to complete an online survey that evaluated respondent demographics, practice characteristics, treatment decision-making factors, use of GA, and access to geriatricians. Results: Sixty-nine respondents identified comorbidities, polypharmacy, and poor functional status as the most frequent challenges in caring for older patients with cancer. Physical function, social supports and nutrition were the most frequent factors influencing treatment decision-making. The majority of respondents perceived value in GA and geriatrician review, although access was a barrier for referral. Such services would need to be responsive, providing reports within two weeks for the majority of respondents. Conclusion: Despite an emerging evidence base for the potential benefits of GA and collaboration with geriatricians, medical oncologists reported a lack of access but a desire to engage with these services.
KW - Frailty
KW - Geriatric assessment
KW - Medical oncology
KW - Survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050166292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 30041979
AN - SCOPUS:85050166292
SN - 1879-4068
VL - 10
SP - 216
EP - 221
JO - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
JF - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
IS - 2
ER -