Venous access: the patient experience

Melissa Robinson-Reilly, Penny Paliadelis, Mary CRUICKSHANK

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Introduction: The evolution of venous access via peripheral cannulation, particularly in relation to the risks and the benefits of this procedure, is reported widely in the literature. However, there is limited research specific to the patient experience of undergoing venous access. Aim: The intent of this qualitative study was to understand patients’ experience of venous access, with the aim of bringing forth their voices about the experiences of repeated venous access/cannulation attempts. Methodology: This qualitative study used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore the experiences of 15 participants in two rural oncology units in Australia. The participants had experienced repeated peripheral cannulation in order to receive chemotherapy. Study participants were asked to describe what it was like for them to be repeatedly cannulated. Data were collected via audiotaped individual interviews, the participants’ stories were transcribed and analysed thematically. Outcomes: Themes emerged from the participants’ stories that provided insights into their perceptions of the experience of being cannulated and the decision-making processes regarding how and where the procedure occurred. The findings suggest that a holistic approach to care was often missing causing the participants to feel vulnerable. Gaining insight into their experiences led to a greater understanding of the impact of this procedure on patients and the need to improve care through encouraging more collaborative decision-making processes between clinicians and patients. Conclusion: The implications for policy and practice focus on improving patient outcomes via procedural governance and education, with the intent of translating the findings from this research into evidence-based practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1181-1187
    Number of pages7
    JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Catheterization
    Decision Making
    Evidence-Based Practice
    Research
    Interviews
    Education
    Drug Therapy
    Hermeneutics

    Cite this

    Robinson-Reilly, M., Paliadelis, P., & CRUICKSHANK, M. (2016). Venous access: the patient experience. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(3), 1181-1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2900-9
    Robinson-Reilly, Melissa ; Paliadelis, Penny ; CRUICKSHANK, Mary. / Venous access: the patient experience. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 1181-1187.
    @article{78a8e61c2b49462dbd2671ebedaa15fa,
    title = "Venous access: the patient experience",
    abstract = "Introduction: The evolution of venous access via peripheral cannulation, particularly in relation to the risks and the benefits of this procedure, is reported widely in the literature. However, there is limited research specific to the patient experience of undergoing venous access. Aim: The intent of this qualitative study was to understand patients’ experience of venous access, with the aim of bringing forth their voices about the experiences of repeated venous access/cannulation attempts. Methodology: This qualitative study used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore the experiences of 15 participants in two rural oncology units in Australia. The participants had experienced repeated peripheral cannulation in order to receive chemotherapy. Study participants were asked to describe what it was like for them to be repeatedly cannulated. Data were collected via audiotaped individual interviews, the participants’ stories were transcribed and analysed thematically. Outcomes: Themes emerged from the participants’ stories that provided insights into their perceptions of the experience of being cannulated and the decision-making processes regarding how and where the procedure occurred. The findings suggest that a holistic approach to care was often missing causing the participants to feel vulnerable. Gaining insight into their experiences led to a greater understanding of the impact of this procedure on patients and the need to improve care through encouraging more collaborative decision-making processes between clinicians and patients. Conclusion: The implications for policy and practice focus on improving patient outcomes via procedural governance and education, with the intent of translating the findings from this research into evidence-based practice.",
    keywords = "Cannulation, Paternalism, Patient-centred, Qualitative, Venous access, Vulnerability",
    author = "Melissa Robinson-Reilly and Penny Paliadelis and Mary CRUICKSHANK",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1007/s00520-015-2900-9",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "1181--1187",
    journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
    issn = "0941-4355",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "3",

    }

    Robinson-Reilly, M, Paliadelis, P & CRUICKSHANK, M 2016, 'Venous access: the patient experience', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1181-1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2900-9

    Venous access: the patient experience. / Robinson-Reilly, Melissa; Paliadelis, Penny; CRUICKSHANK, Mary.

    In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2016, p. 1181-1187.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Venous access: the patient experience

    AU - Robinson-Reilly, Melissa

    AU - Paliadelis, Penny

    AU - CRUICKSHANK, Mary

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Introduction: The evolution of venous access via peripheral cannulation, particularly in relation to the risks and the benefits of this procedure, is reported widely in the literature. However, there is limited research specific to the patient experience of undergoing venous access. Aim: The intent of this qualitative study was to understand patients’ experience of venous access, with the aim of bringing forth their voices about the experiences of repeated venous access/cannulation attempts. Methodology: This qualitative study used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore the experiences of 15 participants in two rural oncology units in Australia. The participants had experienced repeated peripheral cannulation in order to receive chemotherapy. Study participants were asked to describe what it was like for them to be repeatedly cannulated. Data were collected via audiotaped individual interviews, the participants’ stories were transcribed and analysed thematically. Outcomes: Themes emerged from the participants’ stories that provided insights into their perceptions of the experience of being cannulated and the decision-making processes regarding how and where the procedure occurred. The findings suggest that a holistic approach to care was often missing causing the participants to feel vulnerable. Gaining insight into their experiences led to a greater understanding of the impact of this procedure on patients and the need to improve care through encouraging more collaborative decision-making processes between clinicians and patients. Conclusion: The implications for policy and practice focus on improving patient outcomes via procedural governance and education, with the intent of translating the findings from this research into evidence-based practice.

    AB - Introduction: The evolution of venous access via peripheral cannulation, particularly in relation to the risks and the benefits of this procedure, is reported widely in the literature. However, there is limited research specific to the patient experience of undergoing venous access. Aim: The intent of this qualitative study was to understand patients’ experience of venous access, with the aim of bringing forth their voices about the experiences of repeated venous access/cannulation attempts. Methodology: This qualitative study used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore the experiences of 15 participants in two rural oncology units in Australia. The participants had experienced repeated peripheral cannulation in order to receive chemotherapy. Study participants were asked to describe what it was like for them to be repeatedly cannulated. Data were collected via audiotaped individual interviews, the participants’ stories were transcribed and analysed thematically. Outcomes: Themes emerged from the participants’ stories that provided insights into their perceptions of the experience of being cannulated and the decision-making processes regarding how and where the procedure occurred. The findings suggest that a holistic approach to care was often missing causing the participants to feel vulnerable. Gaining insight into their experiences led to a greater understanding of the impact of this procedure on patients and the need to improve care through encouraging more collaborative decision-making processes between clinicians and patients. Conclusion: The implications for policy and practice focus on improving patient outcomes via procedural governance and education, with the intent of translating the findings from this research into evidence-based practice.

    KW - Cannulation

    KW - Paternalism

    KW - Patient-centred

    KW - Qualitative

    KW - Venous access

    KW - Vulnerability

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955684941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/venous-access-patient-experience

    U2 - 10.1007/s00520-015-2900-9

    DO - 10.1007/s00520-015-2900-9

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 1181

    EP - 1187

    JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

    JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

    SN - 0941-4355

    IS - 3

    ER -

    Robinson-Reilly M, Paliadelis P, CRUICKSHANK M. Venous access: the patient experience. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016;24(3):1181-1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2900-9