Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity

Cardoso, F, Costa, MJ, Colaço, P, Vilas-Boas, JP, Pinho, JC, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ. Ventilatory and perceived ergogenic effects of mandibular forward repositioning during running at maximal oxygen uptake intensity. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Wearing an intraoral dental splint may enhance ventilatory function and exercise performance. Nineteen runners performed on a 400-m outdoor track: (a) an incremental protocol to assess the velocity at maximal oxygen uptake (vV̇o2max) and (b) 2 square wave bouts wearing 2 intraoral splints (with and without mandibular forward repositioning). The time until exhaustion at vV̇o2max (TLimv V̇o2max), ventilatory variables, oxygen uptake (V̇o2) kinetics, energetic profiling, perceived exertion and kinematics, were all measured. Ventilatory data were assessed breath-by-breath and perceived exertion evaluated using the Borg 6-20-point scale at the end of TLimv V̇o2max bouts. Images were recorded by video cameras (120 Hz) and kinematic measures retrieved using Kinovea. A paired t test was computed for comparison of splints (p ≤ 0.05). With (vs. without) mandibular forward repositioning, runners increased their TLimv V̇o2max by ∼6% (p = 0.03), coupled with higher ventilation (151 ± 22 vs. 147 ± 23 L·min-1, p = 0.04), end-tidal oxygen tension (114.3 ± 3.7 vs. 112.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg, p = 0.003), and lower inspiratory time (0.526 ± 0.083 vs. 0.540 ± 0.090 seconds, p = 0.02), despite similar V̇o2 kinetics (e.g., 49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 47.7 ± 8.6 ml∙kg∙min-1 of fast component amplitude) being observed. The energy expenditure was ∼8% higher (p = 0.03) with the mandible forward, coupled with lower perceived exertion scores (p = 0.04). Mandibular forward repositioning was effective in acutely improving running performance at vV̇o2max with ergogenic effects on ventilatory and perceived variables.