Vexatious litigation in family law and coercive control: Ways to improve legal remedies and better protect the victims

Emma Fitch , Patricia EASTEAL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Victorian Royal Commission into Family Violence suggested that vexatious litigation may share similar characteristics with violent behaviour, namely coercion and control. In this article, through drawing on the insights of a sample of family law practitioners and the narrative of a domestic violence survivor, we seek to explore how vexatious litigation in family law matters may contain elements of such violence. We also see how vexatious litigation can consume significant court resources, and cause financial and emotional hardship upon the other party. Noting that there are more vexatious litigants in the Family Courts than all other jurisdictions in Australia combined, we examine whether the current family law legislation and family court processes adequately protect the other parties, and assist lawyers in dealing with this type of litigator. We also present a number of legislative and non-legislative suggestions for how responses could be improved, with the caveat that any change to better protect parties from vexatious behaviour must maintain a balance with allowing access to justice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-115
Number of pages13
JournalFamily Law Review
Volume7
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

legal remedies
family law
family court
violence
domestic violence
lawyer
jurisdiction
justice
legislation
narrative
cause
resources

Cite this

@article{158d3fdc2f054e559a3c94cb7f505b1c,
title = "Vexatious litigation in family law and coercive control: Ways to improve legal remedies and better protect the victims",
abstract = "The Victorian Royal Commission into Family Violence suggested that vexatious litigation may share similar characteristics with violent behaviour, namely coercion and control. In this article, through drawing on the insights of a sample of family law practitioners and the narrative of a domestic violence survivor, we seek to explore how vexatious litigation in family law matters may contain elements of such violence. We also see how vexatious litigation can consume significant court resources, and cause financial and emotional hardship upon the other party. Noting that there are more vexatious litigants in the Family Courts than all other jurisdictions in Australia combined, we examine whether the current family law legislation and family court processes adequately protect the other parties, and assist lawyers in dealing with this type of litigator. We also present a number of legislative and non-legislative suggestions for how responses could be improved, with the caveat that any change to better protect parties from vexatious behaviour must maintain a balance with allowing access to justice.",
author = "Emma Fitch and Patricia EASTEAL",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "103--115",
journal = "Family Law Review",
issn = "1037-6631",

}

Vexatious litigation in family law and coercive control: Ways to improve legal remedies and better protect the victims. / Fitch , Emma ; EASTEAL, Patricia.

In: Family Law Review, Vol. 7, 2017, p. 103-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vexatious litigation in family law and coercive control: Ways to improve legal remedies and better protect the victims

AU - Fitch , Emma

AU - EASTEAL, Patricia

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The Victorian Royal Commission into Family Violence suggested that vexatious litigation may share similar characteristics with violent behaviour, namely coercion and control. In this article, through drawing on the insights of a sample of family law practitioners and the narrative of a domestic violence survivor, we seek to explore how vexatious litigation in family law matters may contain elements of such violence. We also see how vexatious litigation can consume significant court resources, and cause financial and emotional hardship upon the other party. Noting that there are more vexatious litigants in the Family Courts than all other jurisdictions in Australia combined, we examine whether the current family law legislation and family court processes adequately protect the other parties, and assist lawyers in dealing with this type of litigator. We also present a number of legislative and non-legislative suggestions for how responses could be improved, with the caveat that any change to better protect parties from vexatious behaviour must maintain a balance with allowing access to justice.

AB - The Victorian Royal Commission into Family Violence suggested that vexatious litigation may share similar characteristics with violent behaviour, namely coercion and control. In this article, through drawing on the insights of a sample of family law practitioners and the narrative of a domestic violence survivor, we seek to explore how vexatious litigation in family law matters may contain elements of such violence. We also see how vexatious litigation can consume significant court resources, and cause financial and emotional hardship upon the other party. Noting that there are more vexatious litigants in the Family Courts than all other jurisdictions in Australia combined, we examine whether the current family law legislation and family court processes adequately protect the other parties, and assist lawyers in dealing with this type of litigator. We also present a number of legislative and non-legislative suggestions for how responses could be improved, with the caveat that any change to better protect parties from vexatious behaviour must maintain a balance with allowing access to justice.

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 103

EP - 115

JO - Family Law Review

JF - Family Law Review

SN - 1037-6631

ER -