'Watchdog' to 'spin-doctor': challenges and benefits

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The movement of journalists between reporting and parliamentary media advising is common. Despite this, there has been surprisingly little scholarly examination of the career transition, its challenges and benefits. This article reports on a selection of findings from a wider study of the transition from journalism to parliamentary media advising and back again. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 21 journalists who had moved between the two roles revealed a range of challenges, including difficulty adjusting to the new role, social and professional isolation and negative perceptions of parliamentary media advising. However, the interviewees also considered the experience gave them a fresh perspective on journalism, increased their understanding of government and politics and made them better journalists. Based on these findings, this paper argues that while crossing over from journalism to parliamentary media advising can be accompanied by a range of challenges, time spent as a "spin-doctor" might increase scrutiny of journalism and politics and help some reporters become better "watchdogs"
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)145-156
    Number of pages12
    JournalAustralian Journalism Review
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

    Fingerprint

    journalism
    journalist
    politics
    reporter
    social isolation
    career
    examination
    interview
    experience

    Cite this

    @article{b26d1e4e919b45cbbc2c6b47f6388d6a,
    title = "'Watchdog' to 'spin-doctor': challenges and benefits",
    abstract = "The movement of journalists between reporting and parliamentary media advising is common. Despite this, there has been surprisingly little scholarly examination of the career transition, its challenges and benefits. This article reports on a selection of findings from a wider study of the transition from journalism to parliamentary media advising and back again. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 21 journalists who had moved between the two roles revealed a range of challenges, including difficulty adjusting to the new role, social and professional isolation and negative perceptions of parliamentary media advising. However, the interviewees also considered the experience gave them a fresh perspective on journalism, increased their understanding of government and politics and made them better journalists. Based on these findings, this paper argues that while crossing over from journalism to parliamentary media advising can be accompanied by a range of challenges, time spent as a {"}spin-doctor{"} might increase scrutiny of journalism and politics and help some reporters become better {"}watchdogs{"}",
    keywords = "Public Relations, Journalism, Political Communication",
    author = "Caroline FISHER",
    year = "2014",
    month = "12",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "145--156",
    journal = "Australian Journalism Review",
    issn = "0810-2686",
    number = "2",

    }

    'Watchdog' to 'spin-doctor': challenges and benefits. / FISHER, Caroline.

    In: Australian Journalism Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, 12.2014, p. 145-156.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - 'Watchdog' to 'spin-doctor': challenges and benefits

    AU - FISHER, Caroline

    PY - 2014/12

    Y1 - 2014/12

    N2 - The movement of journalists between reporting and parliamentary media advising is common. Despite this, there has been surprisingly little scholarly examination of the career transition, its challenges and benefits. This article reports on a selection of findings from a wider study of the transition from journalism to parliamentary media advising and back again. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 21 journalists who had moved between the two roles revealed a range of challenges, including difficulty adjusting to the new role, social and professional isolation and negative perceptions of parliamentary media advising. However, the interviewees also considered the experience gave them a fresh perspective on journalism, increased their understanding of government and politics and made them better journalists. Based on these findings, this paper argues that while crossing over from journalism to parliamentary media advising can be accompanied by a range of challenges, time spent as a "spin-doctor" might increase scrutiny of journalism and politics and help some reporters become better "watchdogs"

    AB - The movement of journalists between reporting and parliamentary media advising is common. Despite this, there has been surprisingly little scholarly examination of the career transition, its challenges and benefits. This article reports on a selection of findings from a wider study of the transition from journalism to parliamentary media advising and back again. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 21 journalists who had moved between the two roles revealed a range of challenges, including difficulty adjusting to the new role, social and professional isolation and negative perceptions of parliamentary media advising. However, the interviewees also considered the experience gave them a fresh perspective on journalism, increased their understanding of government and politics and made them better journalists. Based on these findings, this paper argues that while crossing over from journalism to parliamentary media advising can be accompanied by a range of challenges, time spent as a "spin-doctor" might increase scrutiny of journalism and politics and help some reporters become better "watchdogs"

    KW - Public Relations

    KW - Journalism

    KW - Political Communication

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 145

    EP - 156

    JO - Australian Journalism Review

    JF - Australian Journalism Review

    SN - 0810-2686

    IS - 2

    ER -